· Private foundation
Jerry Metcalf Foundation
Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 28% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +121% since the first grant, against +44% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2021, 9 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HMHOLTER MUSEUM OF ART4× · 2017–2020 · $17k · revenue +43%
- NPNORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL3× · 2017–2021 · $14k · revenue +66%
- ABARCHIE BRAY FOUNDATION3× · 2017–2019 · $14k · revenue +30%
Funded once
- RRRange Riders Museumone grant, 2017 · $5k
- TRTHE ROXY THEATERgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +99%
- MLMONTANA LEGAL SERVICES ASSOCIATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +244%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The montana preservation alliance (mpa) saves and protects montana's historic places, traditional landscapes, and cultural heritage. we are the only statewide, not-for-profit organization dedicated to providing montanans with the resources…
BWP leads reliable and intentional conservation initiatives that promote and provide clean, ample water for people and habitats by working with key partners and our communities
The montana state parks foundation raises private support to enhance the visitors experience and build advocates for montanas state parks and recreation heritage.
To restore, enhance, and preserve Montana's aquatic resources to maximize their ecological function into the future.
Funding and conducting research on issues associated with the ongoing development, infrastructure, historical preservation, and planning of Missoula Midtown and operating educational programs to educate the public about these issues.
To conserve, protect and restore montana's coldwater fisheries and watersheds.
Responsible county planning
The montana wildlife federation is a statewide conservation organization dedicated to protecting wildlife, wildlife habitat, and public access for outdoor recreation.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Wildlife Federation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOLTER MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds ARCHIE BRAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds POWDER RIVER FIRST RESPONDERS LTD ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
- Who funds THE MYRNA LOY ↗
- Who funds FORWARD MT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ROXY THEATER ↗
- Who funds MONTANA LEGAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds The Paradise Center ↗
- Who funds BRIDGERCARE ↗
- Who funds Montana Environmental Information Center ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds ORPHAN GIRL CHILDRENS THEATRE ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF PARK AND SWEET GRASS COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds GARDEN CITY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds CLARK FORK COALITION ↗
- Who funds BLUE MOUNTAIN CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds BLAINE COUNTY FAIR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE MISSOURI BREAKS MONUMENT ↗
- Who funds POVERELLO CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Phoenix Arts Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds GREAT BURN STUDY GROUP dba Great Burn Conservation Alliance ↗
- Who funds UPPER MISSOURI RIVER WATERSHED ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION FOUNDATION FOR BILLINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds Big Hole River Foundation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Treacy Foundation · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · Sample Foundation Inc · The Kendeda Fund · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Patagoniaorg · The High Stakes Foundation · The Steele-Reese Foundation Xxxxx1004 · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Elizabeth Wakeman Henderson Charitable Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jerry Metcalf Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jerry Metcalf Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Jerry Metcalf Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.