· Private foundation
Elizabeth Wakeman Henderson Charitable Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Read this first · the figures below need context
82% of Elizabeth Wakeman Henderson Charitable Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s FY2024 grant dollars went to King Baudouin Foundation Us Inc, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 20 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Elizabeth Wakeman Henderson Charitable Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx named its own grantees at scale: 19 organizations, $198k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k24 grants · $106k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $93k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KBFUS | $35,000 |
| AMERICAN BIRD CONSERVANCY | $17,500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| ONE PLANET INC | $10,000 |
| MONTANA WILDERNESS SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| ATLANTIC SALMON FEDERATION | $10,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| ST MARYS RIVER ASSN | $7,500 |
| AVIAN RESEARCH EDUCTION INSTITUTE | $7,200 |
| GARDEN CITY HARVEST | $5,000 |
| MONTANA EQUESTRIAN EVENTS | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| SACAJAWEA AUDOBON SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| FRIENDS OF OUTDOOR SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| NOVA SCOTIA NATURE TRUST | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 87% of grant dollars ($1.8M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 13% that went abroad ($262k) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 13% of all-years giving ($262k)
2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
46 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2023, 18 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ABAmerican Bird Conservancy7× · 2017–2024 · $71k · revenue +54%
- OCOXFORD COMMUNITY ARTS CENTER7× · 2017–2024 · $54k · revenue +9%
Atlantic Salmon Federation (US) Inc7× · 2017–2024 · $44k · revenue +278%
Funded once
- OCORCHID CONSERVATION ALLIANCEone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -17%
- OCOREGON COLLEGE OF ORIENTAL MEDICINEone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -47%
- ADARIZONA-SONORA DESERT MUSEUMgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $9k · revenue +25%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The wyoming outdoor council's mission is to protect wyoming's environment and quality of life now and for future generations.
To collectively serve as a catalyst for engagement and bonding of people to our wildlife and public lands in montana through a sense of place, education, access, research and stewardship.
Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…
The montana wildlife federation is a statewide conservation organization dedicated to protecting wildlife, wildlife habitat, and public access for outdoor recreation.
To broaden the nature of a liberal arts education; teach critical thinking about social & environmental issues; foster understanding of & respect for natural & human communities; & cultivate a sense of place that encourages personal,…
The montana conservation voters education fund educates, engages, and empowers all montanans to protect our clean air, clean water, public lands, and democracy.
The mission of the montana land reliance (mlr) is to partner with landowners to provide permanent protection for private lands that are significant for agricultural production, fish and wildlife habitat, and open space.
Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…
Greater yellowstone coalition works with all people to protect the lands, waters, and wildlife of the greater yellowstone ecosystem, now and for future generations.
Flathead land trust is dedicated to the conservation of northwest montana's land and water legacy through voluntary agreements with private land owners. flt's primary program service is private land conservation through voluntary…
Protecting our shrub-steppe and connecting people to this vanishing landscape.
The glacier national park conservancy works to preserve and protect glacier national park for future generations.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montana Natural History Center and the most unlike its peers is Blue Mountain Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
- Who funds American Bird Conservancy ↗
- Who funds THREE VALLEY CONSERVATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds OXFORD COMMUNITY ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds Atlantic Salmon Federation (US) Inc ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SACAJAWEA AUDUBON SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MONTANA WILDERNESS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds POMFRET SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Humane Society of Southern Arizona ↗
- Who funds GARDEN CITY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI NATURE CENTER ↗
- Who funds HOPA MOUNTAIN INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN FUND FOR CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds ORCHID CONSERVATION ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF OUTDOOR SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MONTANA TROUT UNLIMITED ↗
- Who funds AMAZON MEDICAL PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Montana Outdoor Science School ↗
- Who funds Gallatin River Task Force ↗
- Who funds OREGON COLLEGE OF ORIENTAL MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE ROXY THEATER ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA-SONORA DESERT MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds 4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Montana Community Foundation Inc · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Cross Charitable Foundation Attn John R Clark · The Kendeda Fund · Merlin Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Patagoniaorg · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · The High Stakes Foundation · Treacy Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · The William H & Margaret M Wallace Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Elizabeth Wakeman Henderson Charitable Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Child Care Connection Inc — 92% of income from government
- Oregon College of Oriental Medicine — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Elizabeth Wakeman Henderson Charitable Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx?
Find your warmest path to Elizabeth Wakeman Henderson Charitable Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.