Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jerome & Toby Rapport Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$454kPublic Benefit$384kCivil Rights$172kEducation$101kCrime & Legal$87kArts & Culture$55kHealth$27kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$15,000
THE FREEDOM FOUNDATION$10,000
JUDICIAL WATCH$10,000
FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS BEIT HALOCHEM$10,000
DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER$10,000
PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$10,000
THE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE$10,000
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION$10,000
LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$10,000
CAMERA-COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 25 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
2

Total granted

$1.3M
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+34%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalPublic BenefitCrime & LegalArts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $180k · revenue +141%
  • DH
    DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $173k · revenue +46%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $101k · revenue +206%

Funded once

  • GE
    GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +34%
  • IP
    INVESTIGATIVE PROJECT ON TERRORISM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
3
Jewish Electorate Institute

The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…

Civil Rights
4
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
5
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
6
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
7
Israel 21c

Through its news service and public programs, Israel 21c educates individuals and groups about comtemporary life in Israel providing news and information on the people of Israel, its culture and business and scientific achievements.

Education
8
Friends of Ir David Inc

To provide assistance to organizations in the old city of jerusalem and the ancient city of david.

International
9
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
10
Institute for Public Accuracy

To teach and disseminate educational materials to the public.

Arts & Culture
11
Friedman Center for Peace Through Strength Inc

To educate the public with regard to the importance of maintaining and strengthening the US-Israel relationship.

Education
12
Israel Team Advocates International Inc

Promote understanding and support for the people of israel

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Judicial Watch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pacific Legal Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
19/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER: $173,000 · OtherDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTEREVERGREEN FREEDOM FOUNDATION: $82,000 · OtherEVERGREEN FREEDOM FOUNDATIONPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $70,000 · OtherPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONCAMERA-COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA: $40,000 · OtherCAMERA-COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MI…INVESTIGATIVE PROJECT ON TERRORISM: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · Other+6 more: $39,000 · Other+6 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $101,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID…ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $94,000 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCENATIONAL JEWISH POLICY CENTER: $69,000 · InternationalNATIONAL JEWISH POLICY CENTERFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC: $60,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETE…COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $50,000 · InternationalCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDL…Chabad Terror Victims Project Inc: $16,000 · International+1 more: $3,000 · InternationalJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $180,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INCTHE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE: $66,000 · Public BenefitTHE HEARTLAND INSTITUTELeadership Institute: $62,000 · Public BenefitLeadership InstituteHoward Jarvis Taxpayers Foundation: $34,000 · Public BenefitHoward Jarvis Taxpayers Found…ENDOWMENT FOR MIDDLE EAST TRUTH: $29,000 · Public BenefitENDOWMENT FOR MIDDLE EAST TRU…Pacific Legal Foundation: $77,000 · Crime & LegalLOS ANGELES OPERA COMPANY: $55,000 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $21,000 · EducationPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationTHE KOBY MANDELL FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 · Philanthropy
Other$439,000International$393,000Public Benefit$371,000Crime & Legal$77,000Arts & Culture$55,000Education$41,000Philanthropy$27,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $180,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER: $173,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $101,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $94,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetEVERGREEN FREEDOM FOUNDATION: $82,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation: $77,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH POLICY CENTER: $69,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetTHE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE: $66,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetLeadership Institute: $62,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC: $60,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetLOS ANGELES OPERA COMPANY: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHoward Jarvis Taxpayers Foundation: $34,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetENDOWMENT FOR MIDDLE EAST TRUTH: $29,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetTHE KOBY MANDELL FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChabad Terror Victims Project Inc: $16,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Immigration Studies Inc: $9,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINVESTIGATIVE PROJECT ON TERRORISM FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREEN FREEDOM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH POLICY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES OPERA COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ENDOWMENT FOR MIDDLE EAST TRUTH ↗
  • Who funds THE KOBY MANDELL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Chabad Terror Victims Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Center for Immigration Studies Inc ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds National Eczema Association ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds INVESTIGATIVE PROJECT ON TERRORISM FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY13.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jerome & Toby Rapport Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jerome & Toby Rapport Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jerome & Toby Rapport’s filings →

More from the funding graph