· Private foundation
Jeremy Lin Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $1k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $650k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMITTEE AGAINST ANTI ASIAN VIOLENCE | $100,000 |
| STREETCODE ACADEMY | $50,000 |
| SOUTH ASIAN YOUTH ACTION SAYA INC | $50,000 |
| DRUM-DESIS RISING UP AND MOVING INC | $50,000 |
| MINKWON CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC | $50,000 |
| CHINATOWN YOUTH INITIATIVES | $50,000 |
| APEX FOR YOUTH INC | $50,000 |
| MEKONG INC | $50,000 |
| ADHIKAAR FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND SOCIAL JUSTICE | $50,000 |
| HARBOR HOUSE MINISTRIES INC | $50,000 |
| ASIAN AMERICAN COALITION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES | $50,000 |
| HOPE HORIZON EAST PALO ALTO | $50,000 |
| TRYBE INC | $30,000 |
| PROFESSIONALS IN CHRISTIAN PHILANTHROPY | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $785k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HHHarbor House Ministries Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $208k · revenue +24%
- CYCOMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO4× · 2020–2023 · $204k · revenue +72%
- HHHOPE HORIZON EAST PALO ALTO5× · 2020–2024 · $200k · revenue +25%
Funded once
ASIAN AMERICAN FUTURESone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -60%
Feeding Americagraduatedone grant, 2020 · $48k · revenue +40%- PFPartnership For The Advancement And Immersion Of Refugeesgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +64%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Asian Immigrant Women Advocates empowers low-income, limited English speaking immigrant women and youth through education, leadership development and civic participation programs.
The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…
To empower AAPI youth in underserved communities through culturally responsive programming and advocacy.AALEAD envisions a United States in which all youth are supported, empowered, and celebrated within equitable, abundant and thriving…
Asians for Collective Action (ACA) harnesses the strenghts of Asians and Asian Americans to drive systemic change to create a just, healthy, and thriving community for all.
Aapi equity alliance is a coalition of community-based organizations that advocates for the rights and needs of the asian and pacific islander (api) community in the greater los angeles area, with particular focus on low-income, immigrant,…
Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.
The core mission of ASIAN, Inc. is the empowerment of the Asian American Community to achieve social equality by reducing dependency to create and expand access to opportunities in the areas of business development, housing and education.…
Coordinate pro bono legal aid for victims of anti-Asian violence.
The Coalition of Asian American Leaders (CAAL) is a network organization of Asian Minnesotan leaders harnessing our collective power to improve the lives of community.
It is the mission of APIAVote to encourage and promote civic participation of Asian Pacific Islander Americans in the electoral and public processes at the national, state, and local levels. APIAVote also aims to educate and inform Asian…
AAPIP expands and mobilizes resources for AAPI communities to build a more just and equitable society.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Apex for Youth Inc and the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Harbor House Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds HOPE HORIZON EAST PALO ALTO ↗
- Who funds STREETCODE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds EAST BAY ASIAN YOUTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN COALITION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds TRYBE INC ↗
- Who funds Committee Against Anti-Asian Violence Inc ↗
- Who funds Mekong Inc ↗
- Who funds APEX FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds CHINATOWN YOUTH INITIATIVES ↗
- Who funds MINKWON CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH ASIAN YOUTH ACTION SAYA INC ↗
- Who funds ADHIKAAR FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND SOCIAL JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds DRUM Desis Rising Up and Moving Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Chinese for Affirmative Action ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN FUTURES ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds Partnership For The Advancement And Immersion Of Refugees ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds MOBILIZE LOVE ↗
- Who funds SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Love Beyond Walls Inc ↗
- Who funds PROFESSIONALS IN CHRISTIAN PHILANTHROPY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Gofundmeorg · The Asian American Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · New York Foundation · New York Women's Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · National Coalition for Asian Pacific American Community Development · Asian American Coalition for Children and Families Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jeremy Lin Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Boston Chinatown Neighborhood Center Inc — 38% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.