Skip to content

Connecticut · Private foundation

The a James Bach and Vona Hopkins Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$89k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
30
Grants FY2025
27
Organizations funded FY2024
11%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$2,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$25,000
Organizations funded a year
17 to 27
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
5
Total assets, FY2025
$1.3M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 11% of the organizations The a James Bach and Vona Hopkins Foundation Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 4% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving29$87k14%
FY202427$85k11%
FY202324$79k17%
FY202219$73k11%
FY202117$66k6%
FY202019$62k11%
FY201920$60k0%
FY201820$55k0%
98% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$228kEducation$129kHuman Services$84kHealth$61kFood & Nutrition$42kPhilanthropy$22kPublic Safety & Disaster$19kInternational$16kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Waveny Care Center Inc$45,00090%
Cornell College$42,00090%
The Stamford Hospital$30,50090%
The New Canaan Historical Society Inc$25,00012%
Norwalk Community College Foundation Inc$22,50090%
New Canaan Artisans Inc$22,0006n/a
Staying Put in New Canaan Inc$22,00091%
Getabout Inc$19,00091%
The New Canaan Library Inc$16,00040%
New Canaan EMS Inc$11,00051%
Show all 17 grantees
All grantees of The a James Bach and Vona Hopkins Foundation Inc by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Waveny Care Center Inc$45,00090%
Cornell College$42,00090%
The Stamford Hospital$30,50090%
The New Canaan Historical Society Inc$25,00012%
Norwalk Community College Foundation Inc$22,50090%
New Canaan Artisans Inc$22,0006n/a
Staying Put in New Canaan Inc$22,00091%
Getabout Inc$19,00091%
The New Canaan Library Inc$16,00040%
New Canaan EMS Inc$11,00051%
Schoolhouse Apartments Inc$11,00090%
Meals-On-Wheels Inc$9,00090%
Town of New Canaan$4,0003n/a
New Canaan Land Conservation Trust Inc$2,00020%
The Harvey School$2,00020%
Totman-Wallace Scholarship Fund$1,5003n/a
Connecticut Foodshare Inc$1,00010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 19 recipients with no EIN on record ($332k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The a James Bach and Vona Hopkins Foundation Inc supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWaveny Care Center Inc: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCornell College: $42,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Stamford Hospital: $30,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe New Canaan Historical Society Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetNorwalk Community College Foundation Inc: $22,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetStaying Put in New Canaan Inc: $22,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetGetabout Inc: $19,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetThe New Canaan Library Inc: $16,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNew Canaan EMS Inc: $11,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetSchoolhouse Apartments Inc: $11,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMeals-On-Wheels Inc: $9,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetNew Canaan Land Conservation Trust Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Harvey School: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetConnecticut Foodshare Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 14.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hobbs Family Charitable TrustCT24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hobbs Family Charitable Trust · Jim and Dede Bartlett Foundation · The Richard & Barbara Whitcomb Foundatio · New Canaan Community Foundation Inc · The Seelert Foundation Inc · Jeniam Foundation · Corbet Family Foundation · The Morris Family Foundation · MLE Foundation Inc · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Hilltop Foundation Inc · Half Moon Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The a James Bach and Vona Hopkins Foundation Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The a James Bach and Vona Hopkins Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The a James Bach and Vona Hopkins Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The a James Bach and Vona Hopkins Foundation Inc

How much does The a James Bach and Vona Hopkins Foundation Inc give?
The a James Bach and Vona Hopkins Foundation Inc reported 30 grants totaling $89,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 17 and 27 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does The a James Bach and Vona Hopkins Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (36%), Education (20%), Human Services (13%).
Who are The a James Bach and Vona Hopkins Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Waveny Care Center Inc ($45k), Cornell College ($42k), The Stamford Hospital ($31k).
Does The a James Bach and Vona Hopkins Foundation Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 11% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The a James Bach and Vona Hopkins Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The a James Bach and Vona Hopkins Foundation Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Hobbs Family Charitable Trust, Jim and Dede Bartlett Foundation, The Richard & Barbara Whitcomb Foundatio.
Where is The a James Bach and Vona Hopkins Foundation Inc based?
The a James Bach and Vona Hopkins Foundation Inc is based in CT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on a James Bach and Vona Hopkins’ filings →

More from the funding graph