Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jeffrey a Marine and Joni G Marine Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$255k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$66k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.0MPhilanthropy$242kCivil Rights$150kHealth$98kReligion$93kInternational$75kRecreation & Sports$50kHuman Services$41kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $169k
$5,150
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$66,000
ALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$52,832
JEWISH FEDERATION$50,000
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAELI DEFENSE FORCES$20,000
THE JGSI$10,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$10,000
ISRAEL TENNIS CENTER$10,000
VALLEY BETH SHALOM$7,200
Individual grant recipient$5,150
US HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$5,000
CEDAR SINAI HOSPITAL$4,500
Individual grant recipient$3,600
JVS SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM$3,500
J Q INTERNATIONAL$2,500
UNITED IN HARMONY$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%CALIFORNIA STRONG: $10k → 10%VISIONARY WOMEN: $5k → 14%VISIONARY WOMEN: $1k → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $2k → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 27 repeat orgs$291k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
31

Total granted

$1.6M
$291k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+61%

Still filing today

41%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $428k · revenue +50%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    3× · 2017–2020 · $100k · revenue +78%
  • BI
    BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2025 · $29k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ALLIANCE FOR INDEPENDENT SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $90k
  • AD
    AMERICAN DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • HF
    HIRSCHBERG FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $17k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
3
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
4
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
5
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
6
Limmud Bay Area

Provide jewish education and cultural services to the jewish community of the s.f. bay area

Religion
7
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
8
The Contemporary Jewish Museum

The contemporary jewish museum (the cjm) makes the diversity of the jewish experience relevant for a twenty-first-century audience through innovative exhibitions and programs that educate, challenge, and inspire.

Arts & Culture
9
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life

Hillel's mission is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

Religion
10
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
11
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
12
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ucla Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Rod Dedeaux Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
23/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $265,334 · OtherCA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONJEWISH FEDERATION: $242,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE F: $150,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FTHE ALLIANCE FOR INDEPENDENT SCHOOL: $90,000 · OtherTHE ALLIANCE FOR INDEPENDENT SCHOOLVALLEY BETH SHALOM: $74,600 · OtherVALLEY BETH SHALOMAMERICAN DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $50,000 · Other+34 more: $289,730 · Other+34 moreALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $427,589 · EducationALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLI…FRIEDMAN AND FRIENDS EDUCATION FUND INC: $16,500 · Education+5 more: $37,000 · Education+5 moreANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $100,000 · Civil RightsFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $40,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $28,600 · International+1 more: $2,000 · InternationalThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $21,800 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $5,000 · Arts & CulturePIECE BY PIECE: $2,800 · Arts & CultureTHE CHASE FOUNDATION: $14,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $6,500 · Health+1 more: $339 · HealthYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST VENTURA COUNTY: $10,000 · Human ServicesVISIONARY WOMEN: $6,000 · Human ServicesUNITED IN HARMONY: $3,600 · Human Services
Other$1,161,664Education$481,089Civil Rights$100,000International$70,600Arts & Culture$29,600Health$20,839Human Services$19,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $427,589 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $100,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $28,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $21,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOACHING CORPS: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRIEDMAN AND FRIENDS EDUCATION FUND INC: $16,500 over 6y, 12% of budgetTHE CHASE FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST VENTURA COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROD DEDEAUX FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetVISIONARY WOMEN: $6,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCONCERN FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJQ INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPOSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED IN HARMONY: $3,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPIECE BY PIECE: $2,800 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Childrens Lifesaving Foundation: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHERE FOR THE GIRLS INC: $339 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOVEBUGS RESCUE: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds COACHING CORPS ↗
  • Who funds FRIEDMAN AND FRIENDS EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHASE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST VENTURA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ROD DEDEAUX FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VISIONARY WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds CONCERN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM ASSOCIATES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds JQ INTERNATIONAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA23× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Alpert & Alpert Foundation · California Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jeffrey a Marine and Joni G Marine Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jeffrey a Marine and Joni G Marine Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jeffrey a Marine and Joni G Marine’s filings →

    More from the funding graph