Loading…
· Private foundation
JEFF T GREEN FAMILY FOUNDATION
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$3.4M
Granted FY2024
11
Grants
8
Communities
$1.2M
Largest
01What you fund
0161% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2024.
Philanthropy$2.5MEducation$1.1MCivil Rights$831kReligion$700kHealth$568kInternational$145kYouth Development$21kOther$3.7M
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2021
book valuemethod determinevalue averageaverage lowlow datedate securities
2022
equalityscholarship peerpeer peerbook valuemethod determinevalue averageaverage low
2023
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 11 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $130k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
- $250k+5 grants · $3.2M
$100,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$116M
Total assets
Largest grants
- RUTH CHEATHAM FOUNDATION COLLEGE FUND$1,200,000
- ICAHN School of Medicine at mount Sinai$1,000,000
- CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS$508,967
- LUMINARIES INC$250,000
- sunstone education foundation incorporated$250,000
- GoFundMeorg$100,000
- buildon INC$40,000
- amref health africa inc$40,000
- the brighton jones richer life foundation$25,000
- kakenya center for excellence$25,000
- Ventura Breakers Basketball Club$7,500
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 10%. 44% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
05
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 14% of JEFF T GREEN FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 41% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 35% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
JEFF T GREEN FAMILY FOUNDATIONlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 18% directed abroad (not shown)Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.5M · 8 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +116% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
8
4
Total granted
$7.5M
$868k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+116%
+37%
Still filing today
88%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
EducationInternationalPhilanthropyCivil RightsHealthReligionOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RCRUTH CHEATHAM FOUNDATION COLLEGE FUND4× · 2021–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +1539% · 82% of their budget
- SEsunstone education foundation incorporated3× · 2022–2024 · $700k · revenue +121% · 63% of their budget
- LILUMINARIES INC3× · 2022–2024 · $558k · revenue +116% · 83% of their budget
Funded once
- EUEquality UTAH FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $786k · revenue +175% · 48% of their budget
- PEPOLICING EQUITYgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $45k · revenue +37%
- CSCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $27k · revenue -39%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Berkeley Endowment Management Company
Bemco provides prof. invest. mgmt. of endowment donations; see schedule o for more information given to the university of california berkeley ("ucb") foundation to benefit ucb.
Education
2
University of Denver
A higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees.
Education
3
California Baptist University
A private institution of higher education, offering students undergraduate and graduate courses.
Education
4
New England Lawboston
Education of students
Education
5
University of Virginia Investment
Uvimco is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations(uaos).
Education
6
The University of Montana Foundation
To inspire philanthropic support to enhance excellence and opportunity at the university of montana.
Education
7
Claremont Graduate University
A private, independent, nonprofit institution of higher learning that is a high research activity university awarding master's and doctoral degrees within its five schools and three independent departments.
Education
8
Utah Valley University Foundation Inc
To assist Utah Valley University (UVU) in fulfilling its objectives: to aid and advance the services of UVU, to raise funds for student scholarships, and to raise funds for University program development.
Education
9
Westminster College
Promote education, the development of skills, knowledge, and personal qualities.
Education
10
Boston Architectural College
Founded 131 years ago, the boston architectural college is a recognized institution providing excellence in practice-integrated design education to members of diverse communities with students representing 35 countries. the bac offers…
—
11
Bryant University
Bryant University's mission is to educate and inspire students to discover their passion and become innovative leaders with character around the world.
Education
12
Uc Riverside Foundation
To support educational, research, and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.
Education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Equality Utah Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Mayo Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
06the grantee network
16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$3,707,970Philanthropy$2,466,555Education$1,071,845Civil Rights$831,060Religion$700,000Health$568,000International$145,000Youth Development$21,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RUTH CHEATHAM FOUNDATION COLLEGE FUND ↗
- Who funds ICAHN School of Medicine at mount Sinai ↗
- Who funds Equality UTAH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds sunstone education foundation incorporated ↗
- Who funds LUMINARIES INC ↗
- Who funds GoFundMeorg ↗
- Who funds buildon INC ↗
- Who funds POLICING EQUITY ↗
- Who funds amref health africa inc ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds kakenya center for excellence ↗
- Who funds the brighton jones richer life foundation ↗
- Who funds PINKARD YOUTH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds BIRZEIT UNIVERSITY FUND ↗
- Who funds Ventura Breakers Basketball Club ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation JEFF T GREEN FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Ventura Breakers Basketball Club.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 911868188 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Ventura Breakers Basketball Club, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 97% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Jeff T Green Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Jeff T Green Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines