Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jeff and Carla Cole Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$48kReligion$33kHealth$15kInternational$13kEducation$5kFood & Nutrition$4kRecreation & Sports$2kAnimals$700Other$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,660
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIVITY CHURCH$3,105
TOLOSA CHILDREN'S DENTAL CENTER$1,660
CENTRAL COAST FUNDS FOR CHILDREN$325
NEWMAN CENTER$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $300 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $300 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $240 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 11%JACK'S HELPING HAND: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
CA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$115k · 22 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +90% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
17

Total granted

$115k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
0%

Still filing today

41%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    JACKS HELPING HAND INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $26k · revenue +130%
  • CC
    CENTRAL COAST FUNDS FOR CHILDREN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +129%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +392%

Funded once

  • SL
    SAN LUIS COASTAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -92%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +40%
  • MC
    MISSION COLLEGE PREP
    one grant, 2017 · $600
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sarasota Memorial Healthcare Foundation Inc

Sarasota memorial healthcare foundation is the philanthropic partner that helps sarasota memorial health care system bring world-class care to our community.

Health
2
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
3
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
4
Mount Sinai Health System Inc

The mission of the mount sinai health system is to provide compassionate patient care with seamless coordination and to advance medicine through unrivaled education, research, and outreach in the many diverse communities we serve.

Human Services
5
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
6
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
7
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
8
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
9
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
10
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
11
Asante

Asante exists to provide quality healthcare services in a compassionate manner, valued by the communities we serve.

Health
12
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIVITY CHURCH: $19,420 · OtherNATIVITY CHURCHMISSION CHURCH: $12,220 · OtherMISSION CHURCHTOGETHER FOR CAMBODIA CHILDREN'S HOME: $11,755 · OtherTOGETHER FOR CAMBODIA CHILDREN'S HOMEOPERATION OUTREACH: $8,000 · OtherOPERATION OUTREACHTRANSITIONS MENTAL HEALTH: $5,585 · OtherTRANSITIONS MENTAL HEALTHTHE SALVATION ARMY: $4,050 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYFOOD BANK COALITION OF SLO COUNTY: $3,400 · Other+21 more: $9,355 · Other+21 moreJACKS HELPING HAND INC: $26,125 · Human ServicesJACKS HELPING HAND INCCENTRAL COAST FUNDS FOR CHILDREN: $5,538 · Human ServicesCENTRAL COAST FUNDS FOR CHILDR…+1 more: $890 · Human ServicesTOLOSA CHILDREN'S DENTAL CENTER OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: $7,970 · Youth DevelopmentSAN LUIS COASTAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,700 · Education17 STRONG: $500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $350 · HealthCENTRAL COAST VNA & HOSPICE INC: $250 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 · HealthSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,000 · ReligionWOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $700 · Animals
Other$73,785Human Services$32,553Youth Development$7,970Education$4,200Health$1,200Religion$1,000Animals$700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJACKS HELPING HAND INC: $26,125 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTOLOSA CHILDREN'S DENTAL CENTER OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: $7,970 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL COAST FUNDS FOR CHILDREN: $5,538 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetSAN LUIS COASTAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $1,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $890 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budget17 STRONG: $500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL COAST VNA & HOSPICE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOrchestra Novo Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JACKS HELPING HAND INC ↗
  • Who funds TOLOSA CHILDREN'S DENTAL CENTER OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL COAST FUNDS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SAN LUIS COASTAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds 17 STRONG ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL COAST VNA & HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Orchestra Novo Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE THE LOVE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation San Luis ObispoCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation San Luis Obispo · Harold J Miossi Charitable Trust · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jeff and Carla Cole Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jeff and Carla Cole Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jeff and Carla Cole Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Jeff and Carla Cole Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jeff and Carla Cole’s filings →

More from the funding graph