Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jeff & Anne Woolson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$17kEducation$9kHealth$2kReligion$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kArts & Culture$2kCommunity Improvement$1kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
8
States reached
$57k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Horatio Alger Association of Canada$1,795
Nicklaus Childrens Health Care Foun$1,200
Century Club of San Diego$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$672
PappyS4EA$500
KLife Ministries$500
Blood Cancer United$250
Pasadena Casting Club$250
Curebound$200
Individual grant recipient$118
Reality Changers$104
Individual grant recipient$102
Biola University$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Orphaned Starfish Foundation: $100 → 17%Seeds of Hope: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OR
NJ
CT
CA
MO
VA
DC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$26k · 8 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
17

Total granted

$26k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+34%

Still filing today

75%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SANTA FE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS
    3× · 2018–2021 · $9k · revenue +27%
  • SF
    SPORTS FOR EXCEPTIONAL ATHLETES
    2× · 2018–2021 · $600 · revenue +36%
  • PC
    PASADENA CASTING FOUNDATION AKA PASADENA CASTING CLUB
    5× · 2018–2025 · $410 · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • SO
    SEEDS OF HOPE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +207%
  • PC
    PARADOX CHURCH INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • SF
    Schaller Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $737
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
3
Stem Advantage

Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…

Youth Development
4
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
5
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

—
6
Connect Foundation

Connect is an innovation instigator established to cultivate san diego's life science and tech communities. a trusted partner for more than 30 years, we propel our region's entrepreneurs as they create and scale their companies from…

Education
7
The King's Academy

The king's academy is a christ-centered school that inspires academic excellence, servant leadership, and enduring relationships.

Education
8
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
9
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
10
Oaks Christian School

The school's mission is: to dedicate ourselves to christ in the pursuit of academic excellence, artistic expression, and athletic distinction while growing in knowledge and wisdom through god's abundant grace.

Education
11
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
12
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Coaching Corps; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTURY CLUB OF SAN DIEGO: $14,376 · PhilanthropyCENTURY CLUB OF SAN DIEGO+1 more: $200 · PhilanthropyHoratio Alger Association of Canada: $1,795 · OtherHoratio Alger Association of CanadaNational Charity League - SDDN: $1,270 · OtherNational Charity League - SDDNNicklaus Childrens Health Care Foun: $1,200 · OtherNicklaus Childrens Health Care FounIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPARADOX CHURCH INC: $1,000 · OtherPARADOX CHURCH INCIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSchaller Foundation: $737 · OtherSchaller FoundationIndividual grant recipient: $672 · OtherSouthwestern Community College: $525 · OtherSouthwestern Oregon College Basebal: $500 · OtherCOACHING CORPS: $500 · OtherPappyS4EA: $500 · OtherK-LIFE MINISTRIES: $500 · Other+13 more: $1,797 · Other+13 moreSANTA FE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $8,850 · EducationSANTA FE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL…+2 more: $204 · EducationSEEDS OF HOPE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesOrphaned Starfish Foundation Inc: $100 · Human ServicesSPORTS FOR EXCEPTIONAL ATHLETES: $600 · Recreation & SportsPASADENA CASTING FOUNDATION AKA PASADENA CASTING CLUB: $410 · Recreation & SportsLEUKEMIATEXAS INC: $300 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 · HealthCUREBOUND: $200 · HealthFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $300 · Youth DevelopmentSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $52 · Crime & Legal
Philanthropy$14,576Other$12,996Education$9,054Human Services$1,100Recreation & Sports$1,010Health$750Youth Development$300Crime & Legal$52

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTURY CLUB OF SAN DIEGO: $14,376 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA FE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $8,850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEEDS OF HOPE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSPORTS FOR EXCEPTIONAL ATHLETES: $600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOACHING CORPS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPASADENA CASTING FOUNDATION AKA PASADENA CASTING CLUB: $410 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEUKEMIATEXAS INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCUREBOUND: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIKES FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREALITY CHANGERS: $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOrphaned Starfish Foundation Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTURY CLUB OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds SEEDS OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds SPORTS FOR EXCEPTIONAL ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds COACHING CORPS ↗
  • Who funds PASADENA CASTING FOUNDATION AKA PASADENA CASTING CLUB ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds LEUKEMIATEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds CUREBOUND ↗
  • Who funds BIKES FOR KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REALITY CHANGERS ↗
  • Who funds Orphaned Starfish Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of San DiegoCA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Sempra Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jeff & Anne Woolson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jeff & Anne Woolson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jeff & Anne Woolson Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph