Skip to content
Jean Hudiburg Family Foundation Attn David Hudiburg at a glance

· Private foundation

Jean Hudiburg Family Foundation Attn David Hudiburg

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$172kHousing & Shelter$87kHealth$63kEmployment$49kPhilanthropy$37kFood & Nutrition$30kRecreation & Sports$30kArts & Culture$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
POSITIVE TOMORROWS$25,000
SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES$20,000
SPERO PROJECT$20,000
INFANT CRISIS SERVICES$10,000
OK UNITED METHODIST CIRCLE OF CARE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 16%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 16%CITY CARE: $5k → 16%SKYLINE URBAN MINISTRY: $5k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $10k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $10k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $10k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $4k → 16%BRITVIL COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$410k · 14 repeat orgs$188k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
17

Total granted

$410k
$188k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+137%
+242%

Still filing today

57%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEmploymentYouth DevelopmentEducationHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PT
    POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +95%
  • SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +8%
  • TS
    THE SPERO PROJECT INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $40k · revenue +318%

Funded once

  • SF
    SHAIR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $37k
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO ART INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
City Rescue Mission Inc

Our mission is to lead our community by serving people experiencing or at risk of homelessness with help, hope, and healing, in the spirit of excellence, under the call of christ.

Human Services
2
Umom New Day Centers Inc

To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.

Housing & Shelter
3
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
4
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

—
5
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
6
Help in Crisis Inc

Our mission is to eliminate family violence, stalking, child abuse, and sexual assault through advocacy, education, counseling, support and prevention services.

Human Services
7
Family Hope House Inc

Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.

Health
8
111 Tulsa Inc

111Tulsa exists to mobilize the local church to see that no child is without a family in Tulsa County.

—
9
Bridge of Hope Ministries Inc

Provide safe & loving home for children

Human Services
10
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
11
Peaceful Family Solutions Inc

Peaceful family solutions dba peaceful family oklahoma (pfo) offers free trauma-informed, age-appropriate, evidence-based, hope-centered programs through day camp and school-based models for children aged 4-18. a key component of the…

Human Services
12
Pivot Inc

Pivot, inc. provides programs and services that focus on counseling; homeless youth services; educational and vocational services; prevention, intervention and diversion services; and address a young persons overall well-being. pivot has a…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Positive Tomorrows Inc; the most unlike its peers is BritVil Community Food Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OK UNITED METHODIST CIRCLE OF CARE: $49,000 · OtherOK UNITED METHODIST CIRCLE OF CARESHAIR FOUNDATION: $37,000 · OtherSHAIR FOUNDATIONSPECIAL OLYMPICS: $30,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICSNEW MEXICO ART INSTITUTE: $30,000 · OtherNEW MEXICO ART INSTITUTEIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKIPP REACH COLLEGE PREP: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · OtherFRONTLINE FELLOWSHIP INC: $10,000 · OtherMID-DEL FOOD PANTRY INC: $10,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA CITY K-LIFE: $10,000 · OtherAGAPE ROAD INC: $10,000 · OtherCITY CARE PERSHING CENTER: $10,000 · OtherBLUE SPRINGS SOUTH HIGH SCHOOL: $10,000 · Other+7 more: $30,000 · Other+7 moreSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesSUNBEAM FAMILY SE…INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $36,000 · Human ServicesINFANT CRISIS SER…SKYLINE URBAN OUTREACH INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesSKYLINE URBAN OUT…BritVil Community Food Pantry: $5,000 · Human ServicesBritVil Community…CITY CARE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCITY CARE INCPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $65,000 · Youth DevelopmentPOSITIVE TOM…THE SPERO PROJECT INC: $40,000 · EmploymentTHE SPERO…CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC: $9,000 · EmploymentCENTER FO…REMERGE INC: $39,000 · Crime & LegalRAINBOW FLEET INC: $36,500 · EducationHOPEHOUSE SUPPORTIVE & TRANSITIONAL LIVING INC: $22,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$295,000Human Services$91,000Youth Development$65,000Employment$49,000Crime & Legal$39,000Education$36,500Housing & Shelter$22,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $65,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SPERO PROJECT INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetREMERGE INC: $39,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetRAINBOW FLEET INC: $36,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $36,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHOPEHOUSE SUPPORTIVE & TRANSITIONAL LIVING INC: $22,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetAGAPE ROAD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBritVil Community Food Pantry: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVERTICAL MINISTRIES: $3,500 over 1y, 3.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SPERO PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds REMERGE INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOW FLEET INC ↗
  • Who funds INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPEHOUSE SUPPORTIVE & TRANSITIONAL LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE ROAD INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SKYLINE URBAN OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds BritVil Community Food Pantry ↗
  • Who funds CITY CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds VERTICAL MINISTRIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Communi…Inasmuch FoundationWegener Foundation IncEl and Thelma Gaylord…Servant FoundationThe Merrick FoundationKirkpatrick Family Af…Sarkeys FoundationAmerican Fidelity Fou…Hudiburg Family Found…Potts Family Foundati…Love Meyer Family Fou…
Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK23.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Inasmuch Foundation · Wegener Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Servant Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Hudiburg Family Foundation Inc Attn David Hudiburg · Potts Family Foundation Inc · Love Meyer Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jean Hudiburg Family Foundation Attn David Hudiburg funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jean Hudiburg Family Foundation Attn David Hudiburg. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 52%
  • Sunbeam Family Services Inc: 52% of income from government
  • Remerge Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jean Hudiburg Family Foundation Attn David Hudiburg?

Find your warmest path to Jean Hudiburg Family Foundation Attn David Hudiburg through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jean Hudiburg Family Foundation Attn David Hudiburg’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home