Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jdm Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$188k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$350kEducation$186kCivil Rights$127kPhilanthropy$61kHealth$48kYouth Development$39kHuman Services$33kPublic Safety & Disaster$31kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$265k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAILEY'S CAFE$70,000
COMMUNITY BENEFIT FOUNDATION$20,000
FEMINIST MAJORITY FOUNDATION$15,000
MCPHERSON COLLEGE$10,000
STMA SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$10,000
GIVE MENTOR LOVE FOUNDATION$10,000
THE KOBY MANDELL FOUNDATION$10,000
THE MIDNIGHT MISSION$10,000
GROSSMAN BURN FOUNDATION$10,000
DOWNEY LOS AMIGOS KIWANIS$5,000
MISSION OAKLAND$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
UNITED WAY OF YOUNGSTOWN AND THE MAHONING VALLEY$5,000
MOMENTUM$1,000
BURBANK YOUTH VOCAL ARTS FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SYNERGY SERVICES: $5k → 8%GROSSMAN BURN FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%GIVE MENTOR LOVE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%LOST ANGELS CHILDREN'S PROJECT: $5k → 14%THE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
MI
NY
MA
NV
OH
NJ
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
KS
DC
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$667k · 16 repeat orgs$288k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
36

Total granted

$667k
$202k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+17%

Still filing today

69%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $86k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BAILEY'S CAFE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $340k · revenue +11% · 41% of their budget
  • FM
    FEMINIST MAJORITY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2024 · $111k · revenue +22%
  • MC
    MCPHERSON COLLEGE
    3× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +129%

Funded once

  • UM
    University Massachusetts Lowell
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • CW
    CECF WISH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +57%
  • AY
    ANDOVER YOUTH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -100%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
2
Children's Hospital Los Angeles Medical Group

To be the preeminent pediatric, multispecialty medical group in the nation, dedicated to providing the highest quality medical care to infants, children and adolescents; and supporting the finest teaching and research endeavors of our…

—
3
Ny Police and Fire Widows' & Children's Benefit Fund Inc

Brief description of the organization's mission the purpose of the fund is to provide assistance to the families of new york city police officers and firefighters who have been killed in the line of duty. after the events of september 11,…

Human Services
4
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
5
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
6
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Aids Foundation

The elizabeth glaser pediatric aids foundation (egpaf) is a proven leader in the fight against pediatric hiv/aids and has reached over 33 million pregnant women with services to prevent transmission of hiv to their babies. to date, egpaf…

Health
7
Los Angeles Police Foundation

The mission of lapf is to create partnerships to provide resources and programs that help the police perform at their highest level and to enhance lapd-community relations.(see schedule o)

Human Services
8
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
9
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
10
Los Angeles Medical Center Foundation
Health
11
The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc

The mission of the breast cancer research foundation, inc. is to prevent and cure breast cancer by advancing the world's most promising research.

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lost Angels Childrens Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Farrah Fawcett Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/44
Grantees still filing
25/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BAILEY'S CAFE INC: $340,000 · Arts & CultureBAILEY'S CAFE INCFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $19,600 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC+2 more: $6,500 · Arts & CultureFEMINIST MAJORITY FOUNDATION: $111,000 · OtherFEMINIST MAJORITY FOUNDATIONMIDDLESEX COLLEGE: $87,400 · OtherMIDDLESEX COLLEGEUniversity Massachusetts Lowell: $20,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY BENEFIT FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $20,000 · Other+30 more: $140,000 · Other+30 moreMCPHERSON COLLEGE: $20,200 · EducationIONA UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationTougaloo College: $10,000 · EducationSTMA SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $10,000 · EducationWORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND: $2,500 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationCECF WISH FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyALADS CARES FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE KOBY MANDELL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyMGM RESORTS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE UNITED WAY OF YOUNGSTOWN AND THE MAHONING VALLEY: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $10,000 · Human ServicesGrossman Burn Foundation: $10,000 · Human ServicesGive-Mentor-Love Foundation: $10,000 · Human ServicesSYNERGY SERVICES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesLost Angels Childrens Project Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesCIA OFFICERS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Crime & LegalLos Angeles County Police Canine Assoc: $2,500 · Crime & LegalEquality Now Inc: $13,000 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $1,000 · International
Arts & Culture$366,100Other$398,400Education$63,700Philanthropy$60,500Human Services$40,000Crime & Legal$17,500International$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBAILEY'S CAFE INC: $340,000 over 8y, 41% of budgetFEMINIST MAJORITY FOUNDATION: $111,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMCPHERSON COLLEGE: $20,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCECF WISH FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $19,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCIA OFFICERS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEquality Now Inc: $13,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetANDOVER YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetIONA UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTougaloo College: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGrossman Burn Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetALADS CARES FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE KOBY MANDELL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPACER CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGive-Mentor-Love Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFixNation Inc: $9,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBEVERLY HILLS POLICE OFFICERS ASSN INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetMICHIGAN FALLEN HEROES MEMORIAL: $5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetMGM RESORTS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTROSE SEARCH AND RESCUE TEAM: $5,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetPACIFIC POINT ACADEMY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSYNERGY SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF YOUNGSTOWN AND THE MAHONING VALLEY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLost Angels Childrens Project Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetCARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PAINTED TURTLE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEVERLY HILLS FIREMENS ASSOCIATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOJOURNS COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILLS SAINTE CLAIRE MUSEUM: $1,500 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetBURBANK YOUTH VOCAL ARTS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMOMENTUM WORK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRHODE ISLAND OVARIAN CANCER ALLIANCE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FARRAH FAWCETT FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACTORS AND OTHERS FOR ANIMALS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Stanley & Joyce Black Family FoundationCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Stanley & Joyce Black Family Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · California Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jdm Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jdm Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jdm Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Jdm Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jdm’s filings →

    More from the funding graph