Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jc Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Animals$168kHuman Services$69kArts & Culture$46kCommunity Improvement$39kHealth$12kPhilanthropy$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kEducation$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$499k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN DIEGO ZOO WILDLIFE ALLIANCE$11,000
SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
SAN DIEGO POLICE FOUNDATION$5,181
SAN DIEGO ZOO WILDLIFE ALLIANCE$3,996
WOODS HUMANE SOCIETY$3,150
SAN DIEGO BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION$2,500
THE ANIMAL FOUNDATION$2,080
CUREBOUND$1,560
THE ANIMAL FOUNDATION$1,356
PASADENA HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY$706
Individual grant recipient$208
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $19k → 11%SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $14k → 11%SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $8k → 11%SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 11%SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
IL
MA
NV
CT
CA
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Jc Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Jc Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$279k · 15 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
22

Total granted

$279k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
0%

Still filing today

60%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HW
    Humane World for Animals Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $97k · revenue +46%
  • SD
    SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN
    5× · 2018–2024 · $52k · revenue +32%
  • TA
    THEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE
    4× · 2017–2021 · $8k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • SH
    SD HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • FF
    Futures Fulfilled Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • HW
    HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
2
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
3
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
4
Humane Society Silicon Valley

At humane society silicon valley, our mission is to save lives, keep families together, and create a better future for pets and their people.(see schedule o for continuation)

Animals
5
Community Animal Treatment Center

Community Animal Treatment Center (CATC) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization committed to delivering high-quality, high-volume spay and neuter (HQHVSN) services for community cats and pets, with a focus on supporting low-income…

Animals
6
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
7
Humane Society of San Antonio (Audit)

To protect and improve the lives of dogs and cats by providing shelter, care, adoption, rescue, spay & neuter programs and community education.

Animals
8
Spot

SPOT Saving Pets One at a Time is a leading San Diego County all-volunteer rescue organization whose main focus is to save dogs and cats in shelters who are at risk of euthanization and to help other dogs and cats in need as well. In…

Animals
9
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
10
Santa Fe Animal Shelter and Humane Society Inc

To support animals, save lives, and spread compassion.

Animals
11
Animal Humane Society

Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

Animals
12
Friends of the Palm SpringsAnimal Shelter

We are dedicated to building a community responsible for pet stewardship and humane treatment of animals.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Diego Center for Children and the most unlike its peers is Paralyzed Veterans of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 59 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%5%<5yr15%5%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr17%23%20–35yr11%14%35–55yr13%50%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%2%<5yr15%3%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr17%5%20–35yr11%6%35–55yr13%84%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,954

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
13/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Humane World for Animals Inc — $96,584 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals IncZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO — $14,996 · AnimalsZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGOSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $10,706 · AnimalsSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCATHE ANIMAL FOUNDATION — $6,436 · AnimalsRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY — $6,330 · Animals+7 more — $15,710 · Animals+7 moreIndividual grant recipient — $39,498 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $36,592 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUSO SAN DIEGO — $14,510 · OtherUSO SAN DIEGOSD HUMANE SOCIETY — $9,950 · OtherSD HUMANE SOCIETY+16 more — $20,409 · Other+16 moreSAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN — $51,575 · Human ServicesSAN DIEGO CENTER…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $4,324 · HealthSAN DIEGO BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION — $2,500 · HealthCUREBOUND — $1,560 · HealthSCRIPPS HEALTH — $1,143 · HealthCIRCLE OF HOPE INC — $500 · Health+1 more — $10 · HealthTHEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE — $7,977 · Arts & CultureNORTH COAST REPERTORY THEATRE — $1,000 · Arts & CulturePADRES FOUNDATION — $5,485 · PhilanthropySAN DIEGO POLICE FOUNDATION — $5,181 · Crime & LegalFutures Fulfilled Inc — $5,000 · Education
Animals$150,762Other$120,959Human Services$51,575Health$10,037Arts & Culture$8,977Philanthropy$5,485Crime & Legal$5,181Education$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $96,584 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN — $51,575 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $10,706 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE — $7,977 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANIMAL FOUNDATION — $6,436 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY — $6,330 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPADRES FOUNDATION — $5,485 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAN DIEGO POLICE FOUNDATION — $5,181 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFutures Fulfilled Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $4,324 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $4,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHumane Society of North Texas — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH — $1,143 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBERKSHIRE HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $1,010 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH COAST REPERTORY THEATRE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF AUSTIN & TRAVIS COUNTY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCIRCLE OF HOPE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego FoundationCA15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jc Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jc Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Jc Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph