Skip to content
Jbj Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Jbj Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$118kPhilanthropy$113kReligion$48kHealth$44kHuman Services$28kFood & Nutrition$19kArts & Culture$17kRecreation & Sports$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$300
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE UNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA$12,000
ULM MEN'S ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION$8,150
ALL SAINTS ANGLICAN CHURCH$5,600
CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES$1,500
OUACHITA COUNCIL ON AGING$1,100
NORTH MONROE BAPTIST CHURCH$1,000
Individual grant recipient$750
ST VINCENT DE PAUL PHARMACY$600
TARVER BRADDOCK FOUNDATION$500
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$500
JOHN CLARK PERRY FOUNDATION$450
WREATHS ACROSS AMERICA$300
FIRST METHODIST CHURCH$300
HUMANE SOCIETY OF LA$250
ST JUDES CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 24%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Pilots for Patients: $10k → 24%ARCO: $1k → 24%ARCO: $627 → 24%TARVER BRADDOCK FOUNDATION: $500 → 24%TARVER BRADDOCK FOUNDATION: $500 → 24%PILOTS FOR PATIENTS: $250 → 24%PILOTS FOR PATIENTS: $100 → 24%ARCO: $50 → 24%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
MI
PA
TN
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$377k · 32 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
26

Total granted

$377k
$71k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

28%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPublic BenefitArts & CulturePhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PILOTS FOR PATIENTS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $10k · revenue +75%
  • SC
    Southern Center for Children & Families Inc
    3× · 2022–2025 · $7k · revenue +9%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $2k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • CC
    COURTLYNNS COMPASS
    one grant, 2023 · $21k · revenue -12% · 38% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Louisiana United Methodist Children & Family Services Inc

The organization seeks to provide the highest quality of care in ministry to the diverse needs of louisiana's children and families by offering a variety of holistic services which promote personal growth and wholesome family life. the…

Human Services
2
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
3
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
4
Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas

The mission of Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas is to perform sacred work by uniting kindness, quality, and healing through the provision of health care services to the community.

Health
5
Southeast Louisiana Legal Services Corp

Who we are: southeast louisiana legal services (slls) is the largest non-profit law firm in louisiana whose mission is to achieve justice through free civil legal aid to low-income people by direct case work, advocacy, and community…

Crime & Legal
6
Orleans Sheriff's Office Foundation
Crime & Legal
7
The Methodist Hospital

To provide high quality, cost-effective health care that delivers the best value to the people we serve in a spiritual environment of caring in association with internationally recognized teaching and research.

Health
8
Orlando Health Inc

Orlando health is a trusted leader inspiring hope through the advancement of health. our mission as a community-owned organization is to improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.

Health
9
Baptist Healthcare System Inc

The mission of Baptist Health is to exemplify our Christian heritage of providing quality healthcare services by enhancing the physical & emotional health of the people & communities we serve, guided by integrity, respect, stewardship,…

Health
10
Willis-Knighton Medical Center

To continuously improve the health and well-being of the people we serve.

Health
11
Baptist Memorial Hospital-Desoto Inc

Baptist memorial hospital-desoto, inc. provides quality medical health care regardless of race, creed, sex, national origin, handicap, or age. its mission is to serve the community with respect to providing health care services and health…

Health
12
Christus Foundation Shreveport-Bossier

The primary purpose of christus foundation shreveport-bossier is to promote philanthropy and charitable giving to provide resources to enhance the ability of christus health northern louisiana in its mission of extending the healing…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Northeast Louisiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tarver Braddock Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
7/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Fredick High School: $54,800 · OtherSt Fredick High SchoolGrace Episcopal School: $27,545 · OtherGrace Episcopal SchoolMiscellaneous: $25,483 · OtherMiscellaneousFood Bank: $16,500 · OtherFood BankULM: $16,450 · OtherULMAll Saint Anglican Church: $15,850 · OtherULM MEN'S ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $15,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherALL SAINTS ANGLICAN CHURCH: $14,900 · OtherPARKVIEW BAPTIST CHURCH: $10,650 · Other+47 more: $85,080 · Other+47 moreUNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA INC: $106,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST LO…COURTLYNNS COMPASS: $21,000 · Public Benefit+1 more: $300 · Public BenefitPILOTS FOR PATIENTS: $10,050 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF OUACHITA: $1,677 · Human ServicesTARVER BRADDOCK FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Human ServicesSouthern Center for Children & Families Inc: $6,500 · Civil RightsLOUISIANA DELTA BALLET: $2,500 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF THE SOUTHERN JEWISH EXPERIENCE: $2,000 · Arts & CultureST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,100 · HealthHELPHOPELIVE INC: $1,000 · HealthBRIDGE HOUSE CORPORATION: $400 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $228 · Health
Other$298,008Philanthropy$106,000Public Benefit$21,300Human Services$12,727Civil Rights$6,500Arts & Culture$4,500Health$3,728

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA INC: $106,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCOURTLYNNS COMPASS: $21,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetPILOTS FOR PATIENTS: $10,050 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetSouthern Center for Children & Families Inc: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOS PETS OF OUACHITA: $3,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetLOUISIANA DELTA BALLET: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOUACHITA COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE SOUTHERN JEWISH EXPERIENCE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ARC OF OUACHITA: $1,677 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTARVER BRADDOCK FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPHOPELIVE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGE HOUSE CORPORATION: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $228 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeeker Springs Ministry Inc: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds COURTLYNNS COMPASS ↗
  • Who funds PILOTS FOR PATIENTS ↗
  • Who funds Southern Center for Children & Families Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOS PETS OF OUACHITA ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA DELTA BALLET ↗
  • Who funds OUACHITA COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF THE SOUTHERN JEWISH EXPERIENCE ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF OUACHITA ↗
  • Who funds TARVER BRADDOCK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lumen Clarke M Willia…The Scott FoundationThe Caridad FoundationLiving Well FoundationRaymond James Charita…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Lumen Clarke M Williams FoundationDE21× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lumen Clarke M Williams Foundation · The Scott Foundation · The Caridad Foundation · Living Well Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jbj Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jbj Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jbj’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home