· Private foundation
Jayzum Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $82k
- $250k+2 grants · $532k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FARSIDE JOURNEY | $266,697 |
| WESLEY'S TAIL OF HOPE FOUNDATION | $265,000 |
| KITTEN RESCUE | $33,458 |
| JAIN CENTER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA | $25,000 |
| JAIN EDUCATION AND EMPOWERMENT TRUST | $12,200 |
| GEM AND JEWELLERY NATIONAL RELIEF FOUNDATION | $11,000 |
| BICHON RESCUE BRIGADE | $5,129 |
| BEOPLE'S BUDDIES ANIMAL RESCUE | $3,525 |
| BULLIES AND BUDDIES RESCUE | $2,000 |
| REAL GOOD RESCUE | $2,000 |
| DAISY SENIOR DOG FOUNDATION | $1,200 |
| BEACHFRONT MUTT'S RESCUE | $1,038 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 32% of grant dollars ($977k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 68% that went abroad ($2.1M) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Beyond the US — 68% of all-years giving ($2.1M)
2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +93% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $281k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FSFar Side Journey Incorporated4× · 2022–2025 · $355k · revenue +304% · 60% of their budget
- BRBICHON RESCUE BRIGADE4× · 2022–2025 · $59k · revenue +93%
- AOAMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC3× · 2021–2024 · $30k · revenue +123%
Funded once
- SSSHRI SEVANTILAL TRIBHOVANDAS JAVERIone grant, 2023 · $100k
- GJGEM JEWELLERY NAT'L RELIEF FOUNDATIone grant, 2021 · $75k
- SMSHREE MAHAVIR HEALTH & MEDICALone grant, 2022 · $33k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
foster based dog rescue working with shelters to save dogs
Dog rescue
Rescue dogs, which includes housing, vetting, and transport.
Saving dogs
Resuce, care and adopting canines
Rescue dogs that are at risk in high kill shelters and ready them for adoption in forever homes
Rescue . Rehabilitate and rehome dogs
Dog rescue
Rescuing dogs from high kill shelters, strays and owner surrenders and getting them completely vetted, socialized and adopted into loving homes.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saving Gizmos Friends and the most unlike its peers is Anekant Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 12. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 17% of your grantees by number, and just 31% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Far Side Journey Incorporated ↗
- Who funds BICHON RESCUE BRIGADE ↗
- Who funds KITTEN RESCUE ↗
- Who funds AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC ↗
- Who funds REAL GOOD RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds I Stand With My Pack Inc ↗
- Who funds KINDNESS2CATS INC BROOKS ↗
- Who funds THULANI SENIOR GERMAN SHEPHERD RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN YEARS DOG SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds ANEKANT COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Literacy Council of Northern Virginia Inc ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC COAST DOG RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds LOVED AGAIN PETS ↗
- Who funds JOY OF SHARING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BULLIES AND BUDDIES RESCUE ↗
- Who funds League of Extraordinary Mutts ↗
- Who funds TAZZY ANIMAL RESCUE FUND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jayzum Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jayzum Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Jayzum Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.