Skip to content
Janie Tobman Moore Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Janie Tobman Moore Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$77kPhilanthropy$30kHuman Services$28kEducation$15kYouth Development$11kAnimals$8kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$682k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION$6,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
WESTCARE FOUNDATION$5,000
EASY DAY FOUNDATION$5,000
LAUREN ELIZABETH FOUNDATION$5,000
BALLER DREAM FOUNDATION$5,000
BREAKTHRU T1D - HOPE GALA$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ATI Foundation: $5k → 7%Nathan Adelson Hospice: $5k → 13%Westcare Foundation: $7k → 13%Westcare Foundation: $5k → 13%WESTCARE FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%Westcare Foundation: $5k → 13%Westcare Foundation: $5k → 13%Lutheran Social Services: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NV
CA
MD
AZ
NC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$83k · 8 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
21

Total granted

$83k
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+13%

Still filing today

50%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    WESTCARE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $27k · revenue +82%
  • THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $12k · revenue +28%
  • AH
    AMANDA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS
    2× · 2020–2021 · $4k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • B4
    Beer 4 Boobs
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • TU
    The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • CC
    Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health
    one grant, 2018 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Banner Alzheimer's Foundation

Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…

Health
2
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
3
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
4
National Brain Tumor Society Inc

National brain tumor society unrelentingly invests in, mobilizes, andunites our community to discover a cure, deliver effective treatments,and advocate for patients and care partners.

—
5
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
6
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Foundation

To aid the alliance for clinical trials in oncology national clinical trials cooperative group and support the clinical trials and laboratory research of the alliance, as well as efforts to educate the medical community on methods of…

Health
7
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
8
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
9
Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Foundation

To fund research to discover cures and more effective treatments for neuroendocrine cancers. the netrf is committed to improving the lives of those affected by neuroendocrine cancer by providing information & educational resources.

Health
10
Patient Access Network Foundation

As a leading charitable foundation and healthcare advocacy organization, the pan foundation is dedicated to accelerating access to treatment for those who need it most and empowering patients on their healthcare journeys. we provide…

—
11
Nevada Cancer Research Foundation Inc

Cancer research.

Health
12
American Association for Cancer Research Foundation

The american association for cancer research foundation accelerates progress in the conquest of cancer by providing financial support for scientific research, education and communication. the foundation funds programs deemed by the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Barrow Neurological Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Merona Leadership Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $11,500 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INCBET YOSSEF COMMUNITY CENTER OF LAS VEGAS INC: $10,800 · OtherBET YOSSEF COMMUNITY CENTER OF LAS VEGAS INCNevada Women's Philanthropy Charitable Fund 2019 (NWP): $10,000 · OtherNevada Women's Philanthropy Charitable Fund 2019 (NWP)Beer 4 Boobs: $10,000 · OtherBeer 4 BoobsThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center: $9,500 · OtherThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterLAUREN ELIZABETH FOUNDATION: $8,000 · OtherLAUREN ELIZABETH FOUNDATIONCleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health: $6,667 · OtherCleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain HealthNevada Women's Philanthropy Charitable Fund 2022 (NWP): $5,000 · OtherNevada Women's Philanthropy Charitable Fund 2023 (NWP): $5,000 · OtherNevada Women's Philanthropy Charitable Fund 2024: $5,000 · OtherWestcare: $5,000 · OtherNevada Women's Philanthropy Charitable Fund 2021 (NWP): $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+7 more: $12,888 · Other+7 moreWESTCARE FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 · Human ServicesWESTCARE FOUNDATION INCNathan Adelson Hospice Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesNathan Adelson Hospice I…ATI FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesATI FOUNDATIONLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF NEVADA: $2,000 · Human ServicesBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthBARROW NEUR…BALLER DREAM FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthBALLER DREA…AMANDA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS: $4,000 · HealthAMANDA HOPE…BREAKTHROUGH T1D: $2,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUG…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,500 · HealthAMERICAN CA…EASY DAY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentMERONA LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Education
Other$109,355Human Services$39,000Health$17,500Philanthropy$10,000Youth Development$1,000Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWESTCARE FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $11,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEASY DAY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNathan Adelson Hospice Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATI FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMANDA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF NEVADA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERONA LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WESTCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EASY DAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Nathan Adelson Hospice Inc ↗
  • Who funds ATI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BALLER DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMANDA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds MERONA LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nevada Community Foun…United Way of Souther…Mgm Resorts FoundationMorgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…Natl Christian Charit…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Nevada Community Foundation IncNV15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nevada Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Southern Nevada · Mgm Resorts Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Janie Tobman Moore Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Janie Tobman Moore Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Janie Tobman Moore Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home