Skip to content

· Private foundation

Janet L Mills Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$485k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$3.6MFood & Nutrition$231kScience & Tech$50kEnvironment$46kPublic Safety & Disaster$18kHousing & Shelter$10kHuman Services$7kHealth$1k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PETA$250,000
WILDCARE$150,000
PERFORMING ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY (PAWS)$50,000
MARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST (MALT)$25,000
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $7k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 10%HOSPICE BY THE BAY: $500 → 8%HOSPICE BY THE BAY: $500 → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.9M · 13 repeat orgs$99k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$3.9M
$99k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+34%

Still filing today

77%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsFood & NutritionHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +147%
  • W
    WILDCARE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $300k · revenue +260%
  • MA
    MARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST
    5× · 2017–2025 · $190k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • CF
    CENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY SCIENCES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -64%
  • NR
    New Roots Institutegraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $35k · revenue +133%
  • HB
    HOMEWARD BOUND
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
2
The Humane League

We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…

Animals
3
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
4
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
5
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
6
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
7
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
8
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
9
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
10
United Animal Nations Dba Redrover

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and…

—
11
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
12
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Farm Sanctuary Inc; the most unlike its peers is People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $3,005,000 · AnimalsPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC+4 more: $69,500 · AnimalsWILDCARE: $300,000 · OtherWILDCAREPERFORMING ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY (PAWS): $160,000 · OtherPERFORMING ANIMA…WILDCARE OF SAN RAFAEL: $100,000 · OtherWILDCARE OF SAN …+6 more: $26,000 · OtherMARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST: $190,100 · Food & NutritionCENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY SCIENCES INC: $50,000 · Food & NutritionNew Roots Institute: $35,000 · Food & NutritionSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE: $46,000 · EnvironmentAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $17,500 · Human ServicesBY THE BAY HEALTH: $1,000 · Human Services
Animals$3,074,500Other$586,000Food & Nutrition$275,100Environment$46,000Human Services$18,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $3,005,000 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetWILDCARE: $300,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetMARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST: $190,100 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $60,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY SCIENCES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE: $46,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNew Roots Institute: $35,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFARM SANCTUARY INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBY THE BAY HEALTH: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDCARE ↗
  • Who funds MARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY SCIENCES INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds New Roots Institute ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds FARM SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds MARIN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BY THE BAY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · Verla Regnery Foundation · Hobsonlucas Family Foundation · McNabb Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Janet L Mills Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Janet L Mills Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Janet L Mills Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Janet L Mills Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Janet L Mills’ filings →

    More from the funding graph