Skip to content
Jane H & William D Young Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Jane H & William D Young Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$302k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.3MHealth$327kEducation$203kHuman Services$61kPhilanthropy$47kYouth Development$22kArts & Culture$14kEnvironment$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$300,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RABUN GAP PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$300,000
HIGHLANDS CASHIERS HOSPITAL$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THORNWELL HOME FOR CHILDREN: $15k → 18%THORNWELL HOME FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 22 repeat orgs$305k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
19

Total granted

$3.7M
$305k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+35%

Still filing today

36%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CHRIST SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $60k · revenue +147%
  • SM
    Smoky Mtn Pregnancy Care Center Inc
    2× · 2018–2021 · $26k · revenue +130%
  • T
    THORNWELL
    2× · 2018–2019 · $25k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • TF
    TGEN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $248k
  • FL
    FIRST LOVE KIDS INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2020 · $22k
  • PH
    PIEDMONT HOSPITAL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Forsyth Country Day School Inc

Forsyth Country Day School is a private, college preparatory independent school for preschool through high school. Students benefit from a challenging academic curriculum, fine and performing arts, competitive athletics, and a wide…

Education
2
The Children's Hospital of Alabama

The mission of Children's of Alabama is to provide the finest pediatric health services to all children in an environment that fosters excellence in research and medical education. Children's will be an advocate for all children and work…

Health
3
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
4
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
5
Anc Mcdowell Hospital Inc

To improve the health of the people of western north carolina and the surrounding region. the entity's operations ceased due to sale of its assets, including the hospital facility, on 2/1/19. the entity is in the process of winding down…

Health
6
Anc Transylvania Community Hospital Inc

To improve the health of the people of western north carolina and the surrounding region. the entity's operations ceased due to sale of its assets, including the hospital facility, on 2/1/19. the entity is in the process of winding down…

Health
7
Christian Healthcare Specialists

Christian Healthcare Specialists exists to provide exceptional medical services to the community, guided by Biblical values.

Health
8
The Methodist Home for Children Inc

To build upon the social, physical, emotional and spiritual strengths of children, youth and families and to affirm their worth.

Human Services
9
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
10
Floyd Healthcare Resources Inc

Healthcare related services

Health
11
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—
12
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Anc Healthcare Inc; the most unlike its peers is Childspring International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $1,921,180 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRABUN GAP PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $1,257,000 · OtherRABUN GAP PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHTGEN FOUNDATION: $247,525 · OtherTGEN FOUNDATIONTGEN: $162,800 · Other+26 more: $145,887 · OtherThe Howard School Inc: $141,013 · EducationCHRIST SCHOOL INC: $60,446 · EducationSmoky Mtn Pregnancy Care Center Inc: $25,500 · HealthANC HEALTHCARE INC: $5,000 · HealthANC HIGHLANDS-CASHIERS HOSPITAL INC: $4,500 · HealthHighlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc: $2,000 · HealthTHORNWELL: $25,000 · Human ServicesFIRST LOVE KIDS INTERNATIONAL INC: $21,667 · Youth DevelopmentROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $14,000 · Arts & CultureFRONTLINE RESPONSE INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 · ReligionTHE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $6,200 · Environment
Other$3,734,392Education$201,459Health$37,000Human Services$25,000Youth Development$21,667Arts & Culture$14,000Religion$10,000Environment$6,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Howard School Inc: $141,013 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCHRIST SCHOOL INC: $60,446 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSmoky Mtn Pregnancy Care Center Inc: $25,500 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetTHORNWELL: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRONTLINE RESPONSE INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $6,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetANC HEALTHCARE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHighlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDSPRING INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Howard School Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Smoky Mtn Pregnancy Care Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds THORNWELL ↗
  • Who funds FIRST LOVE KIDS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FRONTLINE RESPONSE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ANC HEALTHCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds ANC HIGHLANDS-CASHIERS HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Highlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILDSPRING INTERNATIONAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…American Endowment Fo…Raymond James Charita…Natl Christian Charit…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA22.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jane H & William D Young Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jane H & William D Young Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jane H & William D Young’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home