Skip to content
Jane E Hendricks Charitable Trust Luan Wagner Co-trustee at a glance

· Private foundation

Jane E Hendricks Charitable Trust Luan Wagner Co-trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$175k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$380kFood & Nutrition$135kAnimals$130kHealth$130kHuman Services$125kPhilanthropy$80kReligion$20kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Learning Community for Loss Grief and Transition$25,000
Eureka College$25,000
Community Food Bank of So Az$20,000
Gila Community Foundation$20,000
Tu Nidito$20,000
College of Science$20,000
Humane Society of So Az$20,000
Literacy Concepts$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Learning Community for Loss Grief and Transition: $25k → 15%The Learning Community for Loss Grief and Transition: $20k → 15%The Learning Community for Loss Grief and Transition: $15k → 15%OWL AND PANTHER: $10k → 15%OWL AND PANTHER: $10k → 15%PIMA COUNCIL ON AGING: $10k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $20k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$960k · 13 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$960k
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
0%

Still filing today

69%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthAnimalsFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    EUREKA COLLEGE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $115k · revenue +33%
  • HS
    Humane Society of Southern Arizona
    5× · 2021–2025 · $105k · revenue +37%
  • LC
    LITERACY CONNECTS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $105k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • University of Arizona Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue -11%
  • FO
    Friends of Pima Animal Care Centergraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +266%
  • AI
    AZ IMPACT FOR GOODgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
2
United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc

Our vision is a community where every child receives a high-quality education from birth to career, every adult has the opportunity to thrive financailly and in the workplace, and every older person can retire and age with dignity and…

Philanthropy
3
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
4
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
5
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
6
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health
7
One Arizona

One arizonas mission is to increase civic participation among arizonans

Civil Rights
8
Tempe Community Action Agency Inc

TCAA's mission is to eliminate poverty and advance equitable communities. This mission is achieved through the delivery of comprehensive human services programs designed to improve housing stability, increase food security, improve health…

Community Improvement
9
Corazon Az

CORAZÓN-AZ's mission is to cultivate and foster a welcoming and safe community of Arizonans from vast faith traditions and beliefs, schools, and allied organizations; united in expanding our democracy, economic dignity, immigrant justice,…

Civil Rights
10
Arizona Humane Society

We save the most vulnerable animals and enrich the lives of pets and people.

Animals
11
American Indian Association of Tucson Inc

Our mission is to lead, serve, empower and advocate for the Tucson urban American Indian community and others by providing culturally appropriate health, wellness and social services.

Human Services
12
Tucson Audubon Society

Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Az Impact for Good; the most unlike its peers is Learning Community for Loss Grief and Transition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EUREKA COLLEGE: $115,000 · EducationEUREKA COLLEGELITERACY CONNECTS: $105,000 · EducationLITERACY CONNECTSUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $40,000 · EducationUniversity of Arizona Found…College of Science: $90,000 · OtherCollege of ScienceIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…THE LEARNING COMMUNITY FOR LOSS: $30,000 · OtherTHE LEARNING COMMUNITY FO…INTERFAITH SERVICES: $20,000 · OtherINTERFAITH SERVICESOur Family Services Inc: $10,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE-TUCSON: $10,000 · OtherAZ IMPACT FOR GOOD: $10,000 · OtherAARON JUDGE ALL RISE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherCommunity Food Bank Inc: $135,000 · Food & NutritionCommunity Food…Humane Society of Southern Arizona: $105,000 · AnimalsHumane Societ…Friends of Pima Animal Care Center: $25,000 · AnimalsFriends of Pi…TU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $120,000 · HealthTU NIDITO CHI…Bag It: $5,000 · HealthLearning Community for Loss Grief and Transition: $60,000 · Human ServicesLearning Com…YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $25,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH ON THE…OWL & PANTHER: $20,000 · Human ServicesOWL & PANTHE…Pima Council on Aging: $10,000 · Human ServicesPima Council…GILA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $80,000 · Philanthropy
Education$260,000Other$240,000Food & Nutrition$135,000Animals$130,000Health$125,000Human Services$115,000Philanthropy$80,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc: $135,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $120,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetEUREKA COLLEGE: $115,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHumane Society of Southern Arizona: $105,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetLITERACY CONNECTS: $105,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetGILA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetLearning Community for Loss Grief and Transition: $60,000 over 3y, 34% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFriends of Pima Animal Care Center: $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetOWL & PANTHER: $20,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetAZ IMPACT FOR GOOD: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAARON JUDGE ALL RISE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetOur Family Services Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPima Council on Aging: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBag It: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…Community Foundation …The David and Lura Lo…United Way of Tucson …Jewish Community Foun…The Hs Lopez Family F…The Eliot Spalding Fo…Tmc Health FoundationLucille E Williams Fo…Tucson Osteopathic Me…Donald Pitt Family Fo…Connie Hillman Family…
Arizona Community FoundationAZ20.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · The David and Lura Lovell · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · The Eliot Spalding Foundation · Tmc Health Foundation · Lucille E Williams Foundation · Tucson Osteopathic Medical Foundation · Donald Pitt Family Foundation · Connie Hillman Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jane E Hendricks Charitable Trust Luan Wagner Co-trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jane E Hendricks Charitable Trust Luan Wagner Co-trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jane E Hendricks Charitable Trust Luan Wagner Co-trustee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home