· Private foundation
Donald Pitt Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k20 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $33k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LITERACY CONNECTS | $13,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHERN ARIZONA | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION COOPER CENTER | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA | $5,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA POETRY CENTER | $2,500 |
| TUCSON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $2,000 |
| JACKALOPE SCIENCE INC | $2,000 |
| BLAINE FOOD BANK | $2,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION STEELE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH CENTER | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| PRIMAVERA FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY | $1,000 |
| TUCSON GIRLS CHORUS | $1,000 |
| ARIZONA DAILY STAR SPORTMANS FUND | $1,000 |
| ARIZONA LUMINARIA | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
University of Arizona Foundation8× · 2017–2024 · $51k · revenue +109%- LCLAW COLLEGE ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA3× · 2020–2022 · $45k · revenue +55%
- LCLITERACY CONNECTS9× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue +71%
Funded once
- MCMONTEREY COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2020 · $50k
- HFHANDMAKER FOUNDATION DBA THE SANDRUBY COMMUNITY FUNDone grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue -85%
- ACARIZONA CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTERESTone grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…
Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.
To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.
The american civil liberties union of arizona is the state's premier guardian of liberty working through the arizona legislature and communities statewide to defend and preserve individual rights and freedoms guaranteed to all by the…
Arizona Forward brings business and civic leaders together to promote cooperative efforts to improve the environmental sustainability and economic vitality of our state and local regions.
To improve greater tucson and the state of arizona by bringing together resources and leadership to enhance the economic climate and quality of life in our communities.
Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…
We inspire people to live in harmony with the natural world by fostering love, appreciation, and understanding of the sonoran desert.
The mission of the aclu foundation of arizona is to defend and preserve, through litigation and public education, individual rights and freedoms guaranteed to all by the constitution and the laws of the united states and arizona.
The Tucson Investigative Reporting Center educates and informs Southern Arizonans about the community challenges & unique culture of our borderlands through independent local journalism.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arizona Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Felicia's Farm Fka Izi Azi Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
- Who funds LAW COLLEGE ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds Community Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds LITERACY CONNECTS ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHERN ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds TUCSON COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Tucson Symphony Society ↗
- Who funds BLAINE FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds TUCSON VALUES TEACHERS ↗
- Who funds The Primavera Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Tucson High Badger Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds PTA Arizona Congress of Parents & Sam Hughes PTA ↗
- Who funds HANDMAKER FOUNDATION DBA THE SANDRUBY COMMUNITY FUND ↗
- Who funds EDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Womens Foundation for the State of Arizona ↗
- Who funds Arizona Theatre Company ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds INVISIBLE THEATRE ↗
- Who funds GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Arizona Daily Star Sportsmens Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds Tucson Girls Chorus Association Inc ↗
- Who funds HILLEL FOUNDATION AT THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Live Theatre Workshop ↗
- Who funds CASA DE LOS NINOS ↗
- Who funds LOFT CINEMA INC FKA TUCSON CINEMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · Arizona Community Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · Marshall Foundation · The Stocker Foundation · The Gordon Foundation · The David and Lura Lovell · Arts Foundation for Tucson and Southern Arizona · Fred & Christine Armstrong Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Donald Pitt Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Donald Pitt Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Donald Pitt Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.