Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tucson Osteopathic Medical Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.

Education$201kHealth$152kHuman Services$49kYouth Development$10kFood & Nutrition$5kRecreation & Sports$2kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$7,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Burrell College of Osteopathic Medicine$15,000
AT Still University$15,000
Midwestern University$15,000
El Rio Health Center Foundation Inc$7,000
Tucson Medical Center Foundation$7,000
The Haven$5,000
Tucson Postpartum Depression Coalition$3,500
Pima Council on Aging$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Arivaca Human Resource: $8k → 15%Arivaca Human Resource: $8k → 15%St Luke's Home: $5k → 15%St Luke's Home: $3k → 15%Easterseals Blake Foundation: $8k → 15%Pima Council on Aging: $3k → 15%St Luke's Home: $2k → 15%Eastside Neighbors Volunteer Program: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$346k · 15 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
21

Total granted

$346k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+60%

Still filing today

73%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AT
    A T Still University of Health Sciences
    5× · 2021–2025 · $68k · revenue +29%
  • MU
    Midwestern University
    5× · 2021–2025 · $68k · revenue +11%
  • AH
    Arivaca Human Resources
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • EB
    EASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue -5%
  • TH
    Touchstone Health Services
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • IH
    Integrative Healthcare Solutions
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
2
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health
3
American Indian Association of Tucson Inc

Our mission is to lead, serve, empower and advocate for the Tucson urban American Indian community and others by providing culturally appropriate health, wellness and social services.

Human Services
4
Codac Health Recovery & Wellness

Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.

—
5
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
6
The Dons of Arizona
Education
7
Southeastern Arizona Behavioral Health Services Inc

Our mission is continually to improve the quality of life for the people we serve in collaboration with our diverse communities in a respectful, caring, culturally sensitive manner. The organization provides behavioral health services for…

Health
8
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
9
El Rio Santa Cruz Neighborhood Health Center Inc

Improving the health of our community through comprehensive, accessible, affordable, quality, and compassionate care.

Health
10
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
11
Arizona Public Health Association

A nonprofit professional organization working to improve the health of Arizona communities through advocacy, education, and professional development.

Health
12
Marana Health Center Inc

Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easterseals Blake Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Arizona Healthiest State Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health and Educat…Community Health & Social S…Economic Development & Lega…Affordable Housing Developm…Member Clubs & Associations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr18%14%10–20yr19%36%20–35yr12%21%35–55yr13%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr18%6%10–20yr19%39%20–35yr12%13%35–55yr13%43%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
14%
582/4,262

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/31
Grantees still filing
27/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

New Mexico State University — $75,000 · OtherNew Mexico State UniversityMidwestern University-AZCOM — $25,000 · OtherMidwestern University-AZCOMAT Still University-SOMA — $25,000 · OtherAT Still University-SOMATHE HAVEN — $12,500 · OtherTHE HAVENTUCSON POSTPARTUM DEPRESSION COALITION — $7,000 · OtherTouchstone Health Services — $6,850 · Other+7 more — $19,000 · Other+7 moreA T Still University of Health Sciences — $67,500 · EducationA T Still University of Health SciencesMidwestern University — $67,500 · EducationMidwestern UniversityCULTURE OF PEACE ALLIANCE INC — $13,360 · EducationCULTURE OF PEACE ALLIANCE INC+1 more — $2,500 · EducationTMC HEALTH FOUNDATION — $7,000 · HealthTMC HEALTH …BEADS OF COURAGE INC DBA CENTER FOR ARTS IN NURSING — $6,700 · HealthBEADS OF CO…Green Valley Assistance Services Inc — $6,500 · HealthGreen Valle…Saavi Services for the Blind — $6,500 · HealthSaavi Servi…Tucson Interfaith HIVAIDS Network — $3,475 · HealthTucson Inte…AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OSTEOPATHY — $3,000 · HealthAMERICAN AC…TU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $1,500 · HealthCandlelighters Childhood Cancer Foundation of Southern Arizona — $1,500 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC — $1,500 · HealthArizona Youth Partnership — $1,500 · HealthBag It — $1,500 · HealthIntegrative Touch — $1,500 · HealthArivaca Human Resources — $15,000 · Human ServicesArivaca H…St Lukes in the Desert Inc — $9,900 · Human ServicesSt Lukes …EASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION — $7,500 · Human ServicesEASTERSEA…Pima Council on Aging — $2,500 · Human ServicesPima Coun…EASTSIDE NEIGHBORS VOLUNTEER PROGRAM — $1,500 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC — $6,500 · Youth DevelopmentBoys to Men Tucson Inc — $1,500 · Youth DevelopmentEL RIO FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY GARDENS OF TUCSON INC — $4,915 · Food & NutritionLIVING STREETS ALLIANCE — $1,500 · Community Improvement
Other$170,350Education$150,860Health$42,175Human Services$36,400Youth Development$8,000Philanthropy$7,000Food & Nutrition$4,915Community Improvement$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetA T Still University of Health Sciences — $67,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMidwestern University — $67,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetArivaca Human Resources — $15,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetCULTURE OF PEACE ALLIANCE INC — $13,360 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetTHE HAVEN — $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSt Lukes in the Desert Inc — $9,900 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEADS OF COURAGE INC DBA CENTER FOR ARTS IN NURSING — $6,700 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC — $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGreen Valley Assistance Services Inc — $6,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSaavi Services for the Blind — $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY GARDENS OF TUCSON INC — $4,915 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTucson Interfaith HIVAIDS Network — $3,475 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF OSTEOPATHY — $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLITERACY CONNECTS — $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWILL2WALK FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIVING STREETS ALLIANCE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCandlelighters Childhood Cancer Foundation of Southern Arizona — $1,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN ARIZONA ROADRUNNERS CLUB — $1,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetArizona Youth Partnership — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBag It — $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetIntegrative Touch — $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBoys to Men Tucson Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Connie Hillman Family…The Hs Lopez Family F…Arizona Community Fou…United Way of Tucson …Angel Charity for Chi…Jewish Community Foun…Tucson Medical CenterTmc Health FoundationNicholas W Genematas …Fred & Christine Arms…Social Venture Partne…
Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ51.6× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Angel Charity for Children Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · Tucson Medical Center · Tmc Health Foundation · Nicholas W Genematas II Foundation · Fred & Christine Armstrong Foundation · Social Venture Partners Tucson

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tucson Osteopathic Medical Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines