Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

James D Scheinfeld Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$187kHealth$136kEnvironment$124kEducation$63kHuman Services$62kPhilanthropy$51kInternational$36kYouth Development$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN AI FORUM$20,000
NORTHWEST FILM FORUM$15,000
ONE CALL FOR ALL$10,000
AMERICAN JESUITS INTERNATIONAL INC$10,000
SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER$10,000
NORTHWEST FILM FORUM$10,000
MOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION FUND$9,000
NORTHWEST FILM FORUM$6,000
JEFFERSON LAND TRUST$5,000
THE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY$3,000
LAKE MERRITT INSTITUTE$1,000
ST VINCENT SENIOR CITIZEN NUTRITION PROGRAM INC$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $10k → 18%MOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION FUND: $9k → 14%MOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION FUND: $9k → 14%MOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION FUND: $9k → 14%MOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION FUND: $9k → 14%MOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION FUND: $9k → 14%MOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION FUND: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of James D Scheinfeld Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

James D Scheinfeld Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.6% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$651k · 18 repeat orgs$116k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
13

Total granted

$651k
$92k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+27%

Still filing today

94%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JL
    JEFFERSON LAND TRUST
    8× · 2017–2025 · $101k · revenue +186%
  • LS
    Limbitless Solutions Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $96k · revenue +180%
  • NF
    NORTHWEST FILM FORUM
    3× · 2022–2025 · $85k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • BI
    Bainbridge Island Arts & Humanities Council
    one grant, 2023 · $17k · revenue -9%
  • VN
    VISITING NURSE AND HOSPICE
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • TW
    TEWA WOMEN UNITED
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -63%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Film Institute

The Jewish Film Institute champions bold films and filmmakers that expand and evolve the Jewish story for audiences everywhere. Through its exhibition and artist development programs, JFI celebrates the spirit of film, inquiry,…

Arts & Culture
2
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
3
Artist Trust

Artist Trust supports the livelihoods of artists working in all disciplines to create a more vibrant and equitable Washington State.

Arts & Culture
4
San Francisco Film Society

SFFILM is a nonprofit organization whose mission ensures independent voices in film are welcomed, heard, and given the resources to thrive. SFFILM connects and inspires audiences, students and teachers, and filmmakers through our film…

5
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
6
Bay Nature Institute dba Bay Nature Bay Nature Magazine

Bay Nature connects the people of the San Francisco Bay Area to our natural world and motivates people to solve problems with nature in mind. Our vision is that all people have a close relationship with theirnatural world.

Environment
7
Unitedly

Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Human Services
8
Clean Energy Transition Institute

The Clean Energy Transition Institute (CETI) is an independent, nonpartisan research and analysis nonprofit whose mission is to accelerate an equitable clean energy transition in the Northwest.

Education
9
Santa Cruz Local Inc

Independent nonpartisan newsroom serving Santa Cruz County, California we are all watching and engaged in our local government, our needs are addressed, democracy works better and our community is stronger.

10
SFMade Inc

Our mission is to help manufacturers thrive, innovate, and create good jobs, for a more diverse and sustainable Bay Area.

Community Improvement
11
Berkeley Public Library Foundation

The Berkeley Public Library Foundation (BPLF) amplifies the public investment to make a great public library extraordinary. To that end, we provide vital funds and ongoing advocacy to advance the Library's mission, vision, and strategic…

Philanthropy
12
Asian Pacific Environmental Network

APEN builds immigrant and refugee power for a just transition with local roots and statewide impact so all people can live, work, learn, play and thrive in a clean and healthy environment.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jefferson Land Trust and the most unlike its peers is Bainbridge Island Arts & Humanities Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteady#7#4#14#1#9
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%37%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%54%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%24%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,537

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
22/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Limbitless Solutions Inc — $96,000 · OtherLimbitless Solutions IncSKIRBALL CENTER — $20,000 · OtherSKIRBALL CENTERST VINCENT SENIOR CITIZEN NUTRITION PROGRAM INC — $17,500 · OtherST VINCENT SENIOR CITIZEN NUTRITION PROGRA…Bainbridge Island Arts & Humanities Council — $16,500 · OtherBainbridge Island Arts & Humanities Counci…VISITING NURSE AND HOSPICE — $15,000 · OtherRYSE INC — $19,112 · OtherRYSE INCSANSUM CLINIC — $20,000 · OtherSANSUM CLINICTHE AMERICAN AI FORUM — $20,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN AI FORUM+13 more — $66,188 · Other+13 moreNORTHWEST FILM FORUM — $85,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHWEST FILM FORUMSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER — $60,000 · Arts & CultureSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENT…INDIAN PUEBLO CULTURAL CENTER — $5,000 · Arts & CultureJEFFERSON LAND TRUST — $100,500 · EnvironmentJEFFERSON LAND TRU…NORTHWEST WATERSHED INSTITUTE — $14,500 · EnvironmentNORTHWEST WATERSHE…SOGOREA TE LAND TRUST — $8,000 · EnvironmentSOGOREA TE LAND TR…+1 more — $1,000 · EnvironmentMOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION FUND — $52,000 · Human ServicesMOTION PI…TEWA WOMEN UNITED — $10,000 · Human ServicesTEWA WOME…UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $33,500 · EducationTHE FOUNDATION FOR SANTA BARBARA CITY COLLEGE — $26,500 · EducationONE CALL FOR ALL — $44,500 · PhilanthropyKITSAP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $4,100 · PhilanthropyAmerican Jesuits International Inc — $36,000 · International
Other$290,300Arts & Culture$150,000Environment$124,000Human Services$62,000Education$60,000Philanthropy$48,600International$36,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEFFERSON LAND TRUST — $100,500 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetLimbitless Solutions Inc — $96,000 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetNORTHWEST FILM FORUM — $85,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER — $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION FUND — $52,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetONE CALL FOR ALL — $44,500 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican Jesuits International Inc — $36,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $33,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR SANTA BARBARA CITY COLLEGE — $26,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSANSUM CLINIC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRYSE INC — $19,112 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetST VINCENT SENIOR CITIZEN NUTRITION PROGRAM INC — $17,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBainbridge Island Arts & Humanities Council — $16,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetNORTHWEST WATERSHED INSTITUTE — $14,500 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetTEWA WOMEN UNITED — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN EMPOWERED — $9,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEAST BAY ASIAN LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $8,888 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOGOREA TE LAND TRUST — $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINCLUSION NEXTWORK INC — $8,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetCENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA — $6,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIsland Cat Resources and Adoption — $6,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetINDIAN PUEBLO CULTURAL CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKITSAP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $4,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Talented Youth NFFTY National Film Festival for Talented Yout — $3,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY — $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL EAST — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLake Merritt Institute — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA15.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · California Community Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization James D Scheinfeld Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to James D Scheinfeld Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to James D Scheinfeld Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph