· Private foundation
James D & Kay y Moran Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k46 grants · $129k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $111k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN | $39,154 |
| CASA DEL HERRERO | $19,500 |
| TRANSITION HOUSE | $12,420 |
| ST MARK'S FUND | $10,000 |
| SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB AUSTIN | $10,000 |
| THE HOCKADAY SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY | $6,000 |
| DALLAS CASA INC | $6,000 |
| TRINITY EPISCOPAL SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| FOOD ALLERGY FUND | $5,000 |
| AUSTIN PUBLIC LIBRARY | $5,000 |
| DIGNITY MOVES | $5,000 |
| CHILD POVERTY ACTION LAB | $5,000 |
| ST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $67k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
67 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OZOKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY6× · 2020–2025 · $81k · revenue +63%
- CDCASA DEL HERRERO3× · 2023–2025 · $40k · revenue +235%
- THTRANSITION HOUSE6× · 2020–2025 · $34k · revenue +127%
Funded once
- MMMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXASone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -3%
Millsaps Collegeone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +11%- HOHospice of Wichita Falls Incone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…
The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.
The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…
The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.
The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Promise House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HOCKADAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CASA DEL HERRERO ↗
- Who funds TRANSITION HOUSE ↗
- Who funds CHILD POVERTY ACTION LAB ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Midwestern State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD CALIFORNIA CENTRAL COAST ↗
- Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
- Who funds ST PAUL'S SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds FOOD ALLERGY FUND ↗
- Who funds DALLAS CASA ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN AREA SCHOOL FOR DYSLEXICS INC ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds The Family Place ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds HEALING HANDS MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CATE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds NICHOLS HILLS PARKS INC ↗
- Who funds STORYTELLER CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BAYLOR ORAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Mission Scholars ↗
- Who funds TEXAS TREES FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Moody Foundation · The Kirby-Jones Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · Dancing Tides Foundation Inc · Williams-Corbett Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · The John C Mithun Foundation · Tony and Kyra Rogers Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization James D & Kay y Moran Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.