Skip to content

· Private foundation

James C Semerad Foundation

Its FY2017 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.4M
Granted FY2017
14
Grants FY2017
3
States reached
$2.0M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

93% of James C Semerad Foundation’s FY2017 grant dollars went to Omaha Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2017 names 8 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

01What it funds
01FY2017 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $138k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $204k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.0M
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OMAHA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,020,001
OMAHA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$203,844
ST LUKES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$25,000
NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION$20,000
HOPE CENTER FOR KIDS$15,000
YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES$15,000
UNITED METHODIST MINISTRIES$15,000
KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER$12,500
HETRA$10,000
MICAH HOUSE$7,500
OMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION$5,000
GRIEF'S JOURNEY$5,000
US OLYMPIC COMMITTEE$2,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $13k → 12%GRIEF'S JOURNEY: $5k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $15k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Haven Inc

As followers of christ, hope haven's mission is to empower individuals with disabilities through work and life skills so that they may enjoy a productive life in their community.

—
2
The Omaha Home for Boys

The mission of the omaha home for boys is to support and strengthen youth, young adults, and families through services that inspire and equip them to lead independent and productive lives.

Human Services
3
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy
4
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
5
Great Mn Schools

We believe that great schools are the cornerstone of a just and thriving community. ensuring that every child is able to attend a school that works is our moral and social imperative - our children deserve no less.

Education
6
Omaha Children's Museum

Omaha children's museum is a not-for-profit organization that provides children and families with opportunities to discover how the world works, challenge themselves, and learn through play. the mission of the museum is to engage the…

Arts & Culture
7
Omaha Zoological Society

The omaha zoological society's mission is to inspire, educate, and engage people to serve as life-long stewards for animals, their habitats, and their conservation.

Animals
8
Educare of Lincoln Inc

To help young children thrive socially, emotionally and academically through high-quality early childhood education, and in partnership with their families and the community.

Education
9
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
10
Nebraska Community Foundation

The nebraska community foundation unleashes abundant local assets, inspires charitable giving, and connects ambitious people to build stronger communities and a greater nebraska.

Philanthropy
11
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
12
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities Midwest Mn Wi Ia

To provide a "home away from home and offer support to families seeking medical care for their children.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Center for Kids Inc; the most unlike its peers is Youth Emergency Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Omaha Community Foundation: $2,223,845 · PhilanthropyOmaha Community FoundationST LUKES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherUNITED METHODIST MINISTRIES: $15,000 · OtherHETRA: $10,000 · OtherUS OLYMPIC COMMITTEE: $2,000 · OtherNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesKIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $12,500 · Human ServicesGRIEF'S JOURNEY THE COLLECTIVE FOR HOPE: $5,000 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationMICAH HOUSE CORPORATION: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterOMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Animals
Philanthropy$2,223,845Other$52,000Youth Development$35,000Human Services$32,500Education$25,000Housing & Shelter$7,500Animals$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetYOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetKIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $12,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMICAH HOUSE CORPORATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGRIEF'S JOURNEY THE COLLECTIVE FOR HOPE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mutual of Omaha FoundationNE20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mutual of Omaha Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Todd and Mary Heistand Family Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Adah K Millard Charitable Trust · Amy L Scott Family Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Immanuel Community Vision Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James C Semerad Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James C Semerad Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to James C Semerad Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to James C Semerad Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James C Semerad’s filings →

    More from the funding graph