Skip to content

Nebraska · Private foundation

James C Semerad Foundation

Its FY2017 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.4M
Granted FY2017
14
Grants FY2017
12
Organizations funded FY2017
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

93% of James C Semerad Foundation’s FY2017 grant dollars went to Omaha Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2017 names 8 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Median grant, FY2017
$15,000
Largest grant, FY2017
$2,020,001
States reached, FY2017
3
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2017, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Plus 4 recipients with no EIN on record ($52k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mutual of Omaha FoundationNE20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mutual of Omaha Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Todd and Mary Heistand Family Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Adah K Millard Charitable Trust · Amy L Scott Family Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Immanuel Community Vision Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare James C Semerad Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to James C Semerad Foundation?

Find your warmest path to James C Semerad Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About James C Semerad Foundation

How much does James C Semerad Foundation give?
James C Semerad Foundation reported 14 grants totaling $2,380,845 in its FY2017 IRS filing.
What does James C Semerad Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2017, its largest causes are Philanthropy (93%), Religion (2%), Youth Development (1%).
Who are James C Semerad Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2017: University of Nebraska Foundation ($25k), Northstar Foundation ($20k), Hope Center for Kids Inc ($15k).
Does James C Semerad Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as James C Semerad Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Mutual of Omaha Foundation, The Hawks Foundation, The Lozier Foundation.
Where is James C Semerad Foundation based?
James C Semerad Foundation is based in NE.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James C Semerad’s filings →

More from the funding graph