Skip to content

· Private foundation

James and Tara McCahill Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$340kHuman Services$291kRecreation & Sports$202kHealth$168kEducation$94kPhilanthropy$48kHousing & Shelter$40kCivil Rights$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $32k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$21k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OUR LADY OF POLAND$20,000
SEVERAL SOURCES SHELTER$12,000
SOUTHHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOME$7,500
MORGAN CENTER FOUNDATION$7,500
BS HS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$6,100
ORLANDO HEALTH FOUNDATION$2,000
DUNES PRESERVE FUND$500
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE KEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%COVENANT HOUSE: $250 → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 13%THE MORGAN CENTER: $20k → 7%THE MORGAN CENTER: $10k → 7%THE MORGAN CENTER: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
MA
NJ
CO
NE
KY
VA
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 17 repeat orgs$138k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
32

Total granted

$1.1M
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+48%

Still filing today

41%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesReligionPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UF
    USGA FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2023 · $192k · revenue +345%
  • TS
    THE SOUTHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOME
    7× · 2017–2024 · $43k · revenue +43%
  • TM
    THE MORGAN CENTER
    3× · 2017–2019 · $40k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • DO
    DIOCESE OF ORLANDO
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • SJ
    ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • CA
    COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MORRIS AND SUSSEX COUNTIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Prostate Cancer Foundation

The prostate cancer foundation (pcf) funds the world's most promising research on the biology and treatment of prostate cancer, accelerating those discoveries into therapies and strategies designed to improve the quality of life and…

Philanthropy
2
Covenant House New Orleans

Covenant house new orleans (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization affiliated with 34 similar organizations across five countries, all of which are affiliates of covenant house international (parent affiliate) and share a…

Human Services
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
International Catholic Jurists Forum Inc

The International Catholic Jurists Forum (ICJF) was established to produce, compile, and share resources on fundamental human rights under attack in the regional and international human rights protection systems. It operates as a forum for…

Religion
5
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
6
Under 21

Since 1972, under 21, d.b.a. covenant house new york (chny) has been working with one of new york city's most vulnerable populations - youth experiencing homelessness, age 16-24, and their dependent children. chny provides young people…

Human Services
7
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
8
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
9
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

—
10
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
11
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
12
Sacred Heart Foundation Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-center, holistic care which…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Joe Namath Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SEVERAL SOURCES SHELTERS INC: $309,500 · OtherSEVERAL SOURCES SHELTERS INCOUR LADY OF POLAND: $165,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF POLANDBS HS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $80,000 · OtherBS HS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION SCHOLARSHIP FUNDCATHOLIC MINISTRIES APPEAL DIOCESE OF ROCKVILLE: $75,000 · OtherCATHOLIC MINISTRIES APPEAL DIOCESE OF ROCKVILLESOUTHSIDE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $65,000 · OtherSOUTHSIDE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONFELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: $50,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTSDIOCESE OF ORLANDO: $50,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF ORLANDODIOCESE OF PALM BEACH: $35,000 · Other+28 more: $91,050 · Other+28 moreUSGA FOUNDATION: $191,500 · Recreation & SportsUSGA FOUNDATIONARNOLD & WINNIE PALMER FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JOE NAMATH CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $7,500 · PhilanthropyOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 · PhilanthropyTHE SOUTHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOME: $43,000 · HealthOrlando Health Foundation Inc: $2,000 · Health+2 more: $2,000 · HealthTHE MORGAN CENTER: $40,000 · Human Services+3 more: $1,750 · Human ServicesCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MORRIS AND SUSSEX COUNTIES INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,000 · ReligionSOULS AND LIBERTY FKA CHURCH MILITANT: $1,000 · ReligionREMNANT FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Religion
Other$920,550Recreation & Sports$191,500Philanthropy$48,000Health$47,000Human Services$41,750Civil Rights$10,000Religion$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEVERAL SOURCES SHELTERS INC: $309,500 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetUSGA FOUNDATION: $191,500 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOME: $43,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetTHE MORGAN CENTER: $40,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetARNOLD & WINNIE PALMER FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MORRIS AND SUSSEX COUNTIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOrlando Health Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $1,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT OF THE PECONIC INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSOULS AND LIBERTY FKA CHURCH MILITANT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREMNANT FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE FLORIDA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PRO-LIFE ALLIANCE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEVERAL SOURCES SHELTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds USGA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SOUTHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOME ↗
  • Who funds THE MORGAN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ARNOLD & WINNIE PALMER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MORRIS AND SUSSEX COUNTIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JOE NAMATH CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Orlando Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT OF THE PECONIC INC ↗
  • Who funds SOULS AND LIBERTY FKA CHURCH MILITANT ↗
  • Who funds REMNANT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James and Tara McCahill Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James and Tara McCahill Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Covenant House Florida Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James and Tara McCahill Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph