Skip to content

Florida · Private foundation

James and Tara McCahill Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
8
Grants FY2024
13
Organizations funded FY2023
62%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$7,500
Largest grant, FY2024
$20,000
Organizations funded a year
6 to 20
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
3
Total assets, FY2024
$21k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 62% of the organizations James and Tara McCahill Family Foundation Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 20% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
ReligionHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving8$56k25%
FY202313$74k62%
FY20227$63k14%
FY20216$39k67%
FY202012$201k33%
FY201916$243k44%
FY201820$297k60%
FY201713$285kn/a
92% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$340kHuman Services$291kRecreation & Sports$202kHealth$168kEducation$94kPhilanthropy$48kHousing & Shelter$40kCivil Rights$11kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
MA
NJ
CO
NE
KY
VA
NC
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Several Sources Shelters Inc$309,50073%
Usga Foundation$191,50055%
Our Lady of Poland$165,0008n/a
Fellowship of Catholic University Students$50,0002n/a
The Southampton Fresh Air Home$43,00071%
The Morgan Center$40,00036%
Diocese of Palm Beach$35,0002n/a
Arnold & Winnie Palmer Foundation Inc$35,00031%
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Morris and Sussex Counties Inc$10,00011%
The Joe Namath Charitable Foundation$7,5001n/a
Show all 23 grantees
All grantees of James and Tara McCahill Family Foundation Inc by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Several Sources Shelters Inc$309,50073%
Usga Foundation$191,50055%
Our Lady of Poland$165,0008n/a
Fellowship of Catholic University Students$50,0002n/a
The Southampton Fresh Air Home$43,00071%
The Morgan Center$40,00036%
Diocese of Palm Beach$35,0002n/a
Arnold & Winnie Palmer Foundation Inc$35,00031%
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Morris and Sussex Counties Inc$10,00011%
The Joe Namath Charitable Foundation$7,5001n/a
Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation$2,50010%
Orlando Health Foundation Inc$2,00010%
Samaritan's Purse$2,00010%
Disabled American Veterans$1,40030%
Birthright of the Peconic Inc$1,00012%
Souls and Liberty Fka Church Militant$1,00010%
Remnant Foundation$1,00010%
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc$1,00010%
Keys Children's Foundation Inc$1,00010%
Food for the Poor Inc$75020%
Covenant House Florida Inc$50010%
National Pro-Life Alliance Inc$50010%
Covenant House$25010%

Plus 28 recipients with no EIN on record ($356k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget James and Tara McCahill Family Foundation Inc supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSeveral Sources Shelters Inc: $309,500 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetUsga Foundation: $191,500 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetThe Southampton Fresh Air Home: $43,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetThe Morgan Center: $40,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetArnold & Winnie Palmer Foundation Inc: $35,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Morris and Sussex Counties Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetStephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOrlando Health Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSamaritan's Purse: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $1,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBirthright of the Peconic Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSouls and Liberty Fka Church Militant: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRemnant Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKeys Children's Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFood for the Poor Inc: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCovenant House Florida Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Pro-Life Alliance Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCovenant House: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 19.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare James and Tara McCahill Family Foundation Inc with peer funders

About James and Tara McCahill Family Foundation Inc

How much does James and Tara McCahill Family Foundation Inc give?
James and Tara McCahill Family Foundation Inc reported 8 grants totaling $56,100 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 20 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does James and Tara McCahill Family Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Religion (27%), Human Services (23%), Recreation & Sports (16%).
Who are James and Tara McCahill Family Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Several Sources Shelters Inc ($310k), Usga Foundation ($192k), Our Lady of Poland ($165k).
Does James and Tara McCahill Family Foundation Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 62% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does James and Tara McCahill Family Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as James and Tara McCahill Family Foundation Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc, The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program.
Where is James and Tara McCahill Family Foundation Inc based?
James and Tara McCahill Family Foundation Inc is based in FL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James and Tara McCahill Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph