Skip to content

· Private foundation

James and Dorothy Baer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$515k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$555kEducation$355kHealth$320kYouth Development$300kArts & Culture$129kCrime & Legal$90kHousing & Shelter$50kPhilanthropy$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $310k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
$40,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$9.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTH FLORIDA$50,000
YOUNG LIFE$50,000
HIRSHBERG FOUNDATION$50,000
BARNABAS CENTER$50,000
MICAH'S PLACE$40,000
THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES$40,000
AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE$40,000
WHEELS OF SUCCESS$40,000
DRESS FOR SUCCESS$40,000
THISTLE FARMS$30,000
AMELIA ISLAND CHAMBER MUSIC$25,000
NASSAU COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$25,000
PARTNERS FOR CARE$20,000
PINKY PROMISE FOUNDATION INC$10,000
AMELIA ISLAND MUSEUM OF HISTORY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $368k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 13%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 13%MICAH'S PLACE: $40k → 7%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $10k → 13%MICAH'S PLACE: $40k → 7%Metropolitan Ministries: $10k → 13%Nassau County Council on Aging: $25k → 7%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 13%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 13%NASSAU COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $25k → 7%MICAH'S PLACE: $16k → 7%MICAH'S PLACE: $16k → 7%WHEELS OF SUCCESS: $40k → 13%WHEELS OF SUCCESS: $30k → 13%WHEELS OF SUCCESS: $10k → 13%WHEELS OF SUCCESS: $10k → 13%WHEELS OF SUCCESS: $10k → 13%WHEELS OF SUCCESS: $10k → 13%Micah's Place: $10k → 7%WHEELS OF SUCCESS: $10k → 13%MICAH'S PLACE: $8k → 7%Wheels of Success: $10k → 13%WHEELS OF SUCCESS: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 18 repeat orgs$330k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
5

Total granted

$1.7M
$205k

Still filing today

56%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BARNABAS CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $147k · revenue +76%
  • WO
    WHEELS OF SUCCESS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $140k · revenue +22%
  • MP
    Micahs Place Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $128k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • HF
    HIRSHBERG FOUNDATION FOR
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • HF
    HIRSHBERG FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANCER RES
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • AC
    AMRICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gulf Coast Jewish Family and Community Services Inc

Inspired by jewish values, we protect the vulnerable, empower individuals and strengthen families. (continued on schedule o)

—
2
Florida Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc

Working in partnership with state business leaders to secure florida's future.

—
3
New World Symphony Inc

Prepares gifted graduates of prestigious music programs for successful careers in orchestras and ensembles.

Education
4
Ability Housing Inc

The mission of ability housing is to build flourishing communities where everyone has a home. its vision is a society where housing is a right, not a privilege; and all individuals have safe, affordable housing in vibrant communities. it…

Health
5
Florida Police Chiefs Association Inc

Fpca's mission is to continuously enhance law enforcement by providing a unified voice for police chiefs statewide and nationally, serving as the public face of law enforcement executive leadership, and providing a forum for executive…

—
6
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
7
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
8
Academy Prep Center of Lakeland Inc

To inspire and empower students qualifying for need-based scholarships to become future community leaders through a rigorous middle school program coupled with ongoing graduate support.

Education
9
Miami Jewish Health Systems Inc

Miami jewish health systems, inc. was incorporated to provide shelter for the elderly and develop social & health programs relating to their care. in addition, research & educational programs are conducted for the elderly to enhance their…

Human Services
10
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
11
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—
12
University of Miami
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wheels of Success Inc; the most unlike its peers is Amelia Island Museum of History Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HIRSHBERG FOUNDATION: $150,000 · OtherHIRSHBERG FOUNDATIONDRESS FOR SUCCESS: $140,000 · OtherDRESS FOR SUCCESSTHE FRANCISCAN CENTER SUN COAST POST TRAUMA RETREAT: $115,000 · OtherTHE FRANCISCAN CENTER SUN COAST POST TRAUMA RETREATJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF W CENTRAL FL: $100,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF W CENTRAL FLJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WEST CENTRAL FLORIDA: $100,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WEST CENTRAL FLORIDATHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $90,000 · OtherTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIESTHISTLE FARMS INC: $80,000 · OtherTHISTLE FARMS INCMAGDALENE INC: $50,000 · OtherHIRSHBERG FOUNDATION FOR: $50,000 · OtherHIRSHBERG FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANCER RES: $50,000 · OtherAMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW & JUSTICE: $50,000 · OtherUCLA (DR REBER'S PANCREATIC RESEARCH): $40,000 · OtherAMRICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE: $40,000 · OtherTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $40,000 · Other+3 more: $55,000 · OtherWHEELS OF SUCCESS INC: $140,000 · Human ServicesWHEELS OF SUCCESS IN…Micahs Place Inc: $128,000 · Human ServicesMicahs Place IncNASSAU COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesNASSAU COUNTY COUNCI…METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN MINISTR…BARNABAS CENTER INC: $147,000 · Housing & ShelterYOUNG LIFE: $110,000 · Youth DevelopmentHIRSHBERG FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANC: $95,000 · PhilanthropyAMELIA ISLAND CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL: $74,000 · Arts & CultureAmelia Island Museum of History Inc: $5,000 · Arts & CultureJunior Achievement of North Florida Inc: $50,000 · InternationalAMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE INC: $40,000 · Civil Rights
Other$1,150,000Human Services$368,000Housing & Shelter$147,000Youth Development$110,000Philanthropy$95,000Arts & Culture$79,000International$50,000Civil Rights$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBARNABAS CENTER INC: $147,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetWHEELS OF SUCCESS INC: $140,000 over 9y, 4.4% of budgetMicahs Place Inc: $128,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $110,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHIRSHBERG FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANC: $95,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $90,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHISTLE FARMS INC: $80,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAMELIA ISLAND CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL: $74,000 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetNASSAU COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $50,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJunior Achievement of North Florida Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetAMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BARNABAS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELS OF SUCCESS INC ↗
  • Who funds Micahs Place Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds HIRSHBERG FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANC ↗
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds THISTLE FARMS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMELIA ISLAND CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds NASSAU COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Junior Achievement of North Florida Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Amelia Island Museum of History Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Rayonier Advanced Materials Foundation IncFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Rayonier Advanced Materials Foundation Inc · Rose M & Robert W Stubbs Foundation · Okefenoke Rural Electric Membership Corporation Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James and Dorothy Baer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James and Dorothy Baer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Micahs Place Inc: 32% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Amelia Island Museum of History Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James and Dorothy Baer’s filings →

More from the funding graph