Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jam Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$79k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Recreation & Sports$126kEducation$107kReligion$72kHealth$21kAnimals$16kHuman Services$11kFood & Nutrition$9kEnvironment$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $56k
$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$524k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLOSSBURG AREA SWIMMING ASSOCIATION$30,984
BETHANY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$15,000
ST HENRY CATHOLIC CHURCH$10,000
DICKINSON COLLEGE$2,750
PRINCETON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$2,500
COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON$1,500
BLUEFIELD UNION MISSION$1,000
KIAWAH CONSERVANCY$1,000
CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH$1,000
CHARLESTON COLLEGIATE SCHOOL$1,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$1,000
ASPCA$1,000
TAZEWELL COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER$1,000
HIGH HOPES FOUNDATION$1,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VIRGINIAS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $1k → 21%OPERATION HOME: $1k → 12%OPERATION HOME: $500 → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WV: $500 → 21%UNION MISSION: $2k → 21%WOMEN'S CENTER OF MERCER COUNTY: $500 → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
IA
PA
NJ
KY
WV
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$330k · 37 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

37 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
55

Total granted

$330k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+3%

Still filing today

41%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthInternationalAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DICKINSON COLLEGE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +45%
  • TK
    The Kiawah Island Natural Habitat Conservancy Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +132%
  • BU
    BLUEFIELD UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $5k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • BA
    BLOSS AREA SWIM ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • SH
    ST HENRY CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
2
Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine

The mission of the edward via college of osteopathic medicine (vcom) is to prepare globally-minded, community-focused physicians to meet the needs of rural and medically underserved populations and promote research to improve human health.

Education
3
Charleston Southern University

Charleston southern university (csu) is a private, four-year co-educational institution organized under the laws of the state of south carolina as a non-profit organization and sponsored by the south carolina baptist convention. the…

Education
4
East Carolina Health

To improve the health and well-being of eastern north carolina.

Health
5
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
6
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
7
Mcleod Health

To operate a health care system providing medical excellence to the eastern region of south carolina and the extreme southeastern region of north carolina.

Health
8
The Outer Banks Hospital Inc

To enhance the quality of life for the residents and visitors of dare county and the surrounding region by promoting wellness and providing the highest quality healthcare services.

Health
9
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
10
University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Inc

To improve the health and well-being of eastern north carolina.

Health
11
Mcleod Physician Associates Ii

Mcleod physician associates ii operates as a part of the mcleod health system. the mission of mcleod health is to improve the overall health and well being of people living within south carolina and eastern north carolina by providing…

Health
12
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mt Pleasant Academy Pta. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsAnimal Rescue and ShelterCommunity FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…Cancer Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Food Banks and PantriesAffordable Housing Construc…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%8%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%40%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%53%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/43
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,522

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/38
Grantees still filing
22/38
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BLOSSBURG AREA SWIMMING ASSOCIATION — $94,880 · OtherBLOSSBURG AREA SWIMMING ASSOCIATIONBETHANY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $50,812 · OtherBETHANY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLST HENRY CATHOLIC CHURCH — $47,500 · OtherST HENRY CATHOLIC CHURCH+78 more — $150,855 · Other+78 moreDICKINSON COLLEGE — $15,250 · EducationBLUEFIELD UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · EducationFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 · EducationCONCORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · EducationWHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY INC — $1,000 · Education+2 more — $1,250 · EducationBlue Ridge Junior Golf Tour Inc — $9,500 · Recreation & SportsKIDS ON POINT INC — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsPrinceton Community Health Foundation Inc — $7,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · Health+2 more — $500 · HealthThe Kiawah Island Natural Habitat Conservancy Inc — $6,000 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC — $500 · EnvironmentCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA — $4,461 · InternationalWORLD PEDIATRICS — $1,000 · InternationalHearts2Honduras Inc — $1,000 · InternationalTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $4,500 · AnimalsSOUTHEAST GERMAN SHORTHAIRED POINTER RESCUE INC — $1,000 · Animals
Other$344,047Education$27,000Recreation & Sports$10,500Health$8,500Environment$6,500International$6,461Animals$5,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDICKINSON COLLEGE — $15,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBLUEFIELD UNION MISSION INC — $10,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBlue Ridge Junior Golf Tour Inc — $9,500 over 4y, 8.8% of budgetPrinceton Community Health Foundation Inc — $7,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThe Kiawah Island Natural Habitat Conservancy Inc — $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBLUEFIELD UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCharleston Collegiate School — $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA — $4,461 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNION MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $1,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION HOME INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VIRGINIAS INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSea Island Habitat For Humanity Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS ON POINT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWORLD PEDIATRICS — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH HOPES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEAST GERMAN SHORTHAIRED POINTER RESCUE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHearts2Honduras Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARFAN FOUNDATION INC — $763 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN MISSION SCHOOL INC — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEREA COLLEGE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA CENTRAL NC COUNCIL #416 — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Liver Foundation — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMt Pleasant Academy PTA — $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DICKINSON COLLEGE
  • Who funds BLUEFIELD UNION MISSION INC
  • Who funds Blue Ridge Junior Golf Tour Inc
  • Who funds Princeton Community Health Foundation Inc
  • Who funds The Kiawah Island Natural Habitat Conservancy Inc
  • Who funds BLUEFIELD UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Charleston Collegiate School
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA
  • Who funds FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC
  • Who funds CONCORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds UNION MISSION MINISTRIES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Stelio and Betty Tracy Corte Charitable FoundationWV24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Stelio and Betty Tracy Corte Charitable Foundation · The Pace Family Foundation Inc · Preservati Family Char Tr Fdn · Celanese Foundation · Kelly Family Foundation · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · The 1912 Charitable Foundation · The Marshall Miller Foundation · Beyond Our Gates Foundation of Kiawah & Seabrook · K B Tierney Charitable Foundation Trust · The H P and Anne S Hunnicutt Foundation · George R & Janet E Desko Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jam Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Feeding South Florida Inc5% of income from government
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc2% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jam Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Jam Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 101 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph