Loading…
Loading…
Virginia · Nonprofit
Blue Ridge Junior Golf Tour Inc (Virginia) is funded by 7 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $30,400 in grants to it, the largest being THE PAUL & CAROL COLE FOUNDATION INC ($10,000). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
Blue Ridge Junior Golf Tour Inc runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 12,803 recreation & sports nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 12,803 recreation & sports nonprofits under $100k, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant income rose $250 → $5k on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
From the IRS filings of Blue Ridge Junior Golf Tour Inc’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
Blue Ridge Junior Golf Tour Inc leans on a few funders — its largest provides 33% of grant income and the top three 76%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2020 57% · 2021 47% · 2022 48% · 2023 100% · 2024 80% · 2025 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
Blue Ridge Junior Golf Tour Inc draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Virginia — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 2 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 82 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing