· Private foundation
Jacques and Natasha Gelman Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 41% of JACQUES AND NATASHA GELMAN FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k19 grants · $359k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MARYLAND INSTITUTE COLLEGE OF ART | $200,000 |
| COOPER UNION | $170,000 |
| NEW MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART | $150,000 |
| MADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY | $100,000 |
| AMIGOS DEL MUSEO DEL BARRIO | $100,000 |
| THE NELSON- ATKINS MUSEUM | $75,000 |
| TEMPLE UNIVERSITY | $75,000 |
| RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN | $50,000 |
| COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS | $50,000 |
| PS 1 CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER | $50,000 |
| SWISS INSTITUTE | $30,000 |
| BEAM CENTER | $25,000 |
| PUBLIC ART FUND | $25,000 |
| TIMES SQUARE DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION INC | $25,000 |
| BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
29 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $314k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ADAMIGOS DEL MUSEO DEL BARRIO INC EL MUSEO DEL BARRIO5× · 2020–2024 · $487k · revenue +29%
- NMNew Museum of Contemporary Art3× · 2021–2024 · $300k · revenue +122%
- MSMADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC3× · 2020–2024 · $200k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- TATHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGOone grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue +12%
- TSTHE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEMone grant, 2022 · $330k · revenue +3%
- WMWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ARTgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +69%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…
Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…
The institute of contemporary art, miami (ica miami), is dedicated to promoting the work of contemporary artists, and to the exchange of art and ideas throughout the miami region and internationally. through an energetic calendar of…
Committed to innovation, the solomon r. guggenheim foundation (the "foundation") collects, (continued on schedule o)
See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…
The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).
The metropolitan museum of art collects, studies, conserves, and presents significant works of art across all times and cultures in order to connect people to creativity, knowledge, and ideas.
The phillips collection is the oldest museum of modern and contemporary art in the u.s. in addition to presentation of works from the permanent collection and special exhibitions, the museum maintains active educational, academic,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Museum of Contemporary Art and the most unlike its peers is Penumbra Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds AMIGOS DEL MUSEO DEL BARRIO INC EL MUSEO DEL BARRIO ↗
- Who funds Maryland Institute ↗
- Who funds THE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM ↗
- Who funds New Museum of Contemporary Art ↗
- Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds MADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART ↗
- Who funds RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds BEAM CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NYC SALT INC ↗
- Who funds SWISS INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
- Who funds The Contemporary Arts Center ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC ART FUND INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAS SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds CREATIVE TIME INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PENUMBRA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds United States Artists Inc ↗
- Who funds PS 1 CONTEMPORARY ART CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · Charina Foundation Inc Richard Menschel · Milton and Sally Avery Arts Foundation · Terra Foundation for American Art · Hillman Family Foundations · Teiger Foundation · Via Art Fund Inc · Shelley & Donald Rubin Foundation · Helen Frankenthaler Foundation Inc · The Cowles Charitable Trust · The Henry Luce Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jacques and Natasha Gelman Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Aldrich Contemporary Art Museum Inc — 9% of income from government
- Baltimore Museum of Art — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jacques and Natasha Gelman Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Jacques and Natasha Gelman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.