· Private foundation
Shelley & Donald Rubin Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2021
- Under $10k7 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $245k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE SUSTAINABILITY LABORATORY INC | $25,000 |
| QUEENS MUSEUM OF ART | $25,000 |
| SOCRATES SCULPTURE PARK | $15,000 |
| BROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY | $10,000 |
| ASIAN AMERICAN ARTS ALLIANCE | $10,000 |
| WORKING ARTISTS AND THE GREATER ECONOMY | $10,000 |
| THEATRE OF THE OPPRESSED NYC | $10,000 |
| MOVEMENT RESEARCH | $10,000 |
| RECESS ACTIVITIES INC | $10,000 |
| LOISAIDA INC | $10,000 |
| PARTICIPANT INC | $10,000 |
| BRONX MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| NUYORICAN POETS CAFE | $10,000 |
| DANCE SERVICE NEW YORK CITY INC | $10,000 |
| VISUAL AIDS | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
70 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2021, 46 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HAHIMALAYAN ART RESOURCES INC2× · 2018–2019 · $150k · revenue +83% · 29% of their budget
- QMQUEENS MUSEUM OF ART5× · 2017–2021 · $140k · revenue +56%
The Laundromat Project Inc4× · 2017–2020 · $84k · revenue +164%
Funded once
- ININTERNEWS NETWORKgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +109%
- CCCREATIVE CAPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +37%
- PCPING CHONG COMPANYone grant, 2017 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Tank is a small, Manhattan-based non-profit arts presenter and producer serving emerging artists. Our goal is to remove economic barriers from the creation of new work for artists launching their careers or experimenting within their…
The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…
On this spot nyc: stories of pioneering women arists is a nonprofit 501(c) (3) organization committed to diversity, equity, and inclusion. it focuses on women artists, a group that continues to be marginalized. on this spot is conceived as…
See schedule operformance space new york is committed to promoting the arts (including performance, visual and all other contemporary arts), fostering artistic development (including through direct grants), advancing diversity in the field…
Artpace san antonio is a nonprofit residency program which supports texas, national, and international artists in the creation of new art. see schedule o for continuation.
The Harlem Art''s Foundation''s Mission Is To Showcase And Preserve Harlem''s Tradition Of Rich Culture And Community By Working With Our Local Partners To Strategically Shape The Physical And Social Opportunities Of Our Neighborhood…
The cuban artists fund is committed to supporting artists of cuban ancestry and providing the public with programs aimed at creating broader appreciation for cuban arts and its global impact both historically and in today's society.the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Artists Space Inc and the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
104 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 104 of the 130 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HIMALAYAN ART RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds QUEENS MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds SOCRATES SCULPTURE PARK INC ↗
- Who funds The Laundromat Project Inc ↗
- Who funds CREATIVE TIME INC ↗
- Who funds THEATRE OF THE OPPRESSED NYC INC ↗
- Who funds PARTICIPANT INC ↗
- Who funds VISUAL AIDS FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds GINA GIBNEY DANCE INC ↗
- Who funds WORKING ARTISTS AND THE GREATER ECONOMY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF MATERIALS FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds DANCING IN THE STREETS INC ↗
- Who funds FRANKLIN FURNACE ARCHIVE INC ↗
- Who funds More Art Inc ↗
- Who funds HOOK ARTS MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds The Bronx Museum of the Arts ↗
- Who funds ARTISTS IN RESIDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM ↗
- Who funds The Sustainability Laboratory Inc ↗
- Who funds CUE ART FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ISSUE PROJECT ROOM INC ↗
- Who funds THE LESLIE LOHMAN MUSEUM OF GAY AND LESBIAN ART ↗
- Who funds HALEAKALA INC ↗
- Who funds AMIGOS DEL MUSEO DEL BARRIO INC EL MUSEO DEL BARRIO ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR URBAN PEDAGOGY INC ↗
- Who funds Five Myles Inc ↗
- Who funds THE SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF WEEKSVILLE & BEDFORD-STUYVESANT ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN DEFENDER SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NO LONGER EMPTY INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG NEW YORKERS INC ↗
- Who funds Nuyorican Poets Cafe Inc ↗
- Who funds MOVEMENT RESEARCH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ford Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · New York Council for the Humanities · Mid Atlantic Arts Inc · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · Mertz Gilmore Foundation · The Laurie M Tisch Foundation Inc · Jerome Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Shelley & Donald Rubin Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Shelley & Donald Rubin Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Shelley & Donald Rubin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.