Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jack and Robin Hake Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$2.1MEducation$984kInternational$710kHealth$649kHuman Services$520kPhilanthropy$60kArts & Culture$25kYouth Development$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $228k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $945k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$50,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAINT MARY CATHOLIC SCHOOL - ANGEL SCHOLARSHIP FUND$250,000
Individual grant recipient$150,000
OUR LITTLE HAVEN$125,000
MISSION INTERNATIONAL$120,000
ST PAUL CENTER FOR BIBLICAL THEOLOGY$110,000
OUR SORROWFUL MOTHER'S MINISTRY$75,000
FOCUS$70,000
SIUE NEWMAN CATHOLIC COMMUNITY$70,000
VAGABOND MISSIONS$65,000
SISTERS OF ST FRANCIS$60,000
CATHOLICS COME HOME$50,000
WORLD PEDIATRIC PROJECT$50,000
A BEACON OF LIGHT PREGNANCY CENTER$40,000
ST LOUIS OVARIAN CANCER AWARENESS$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA MELANOMA RESEARCH$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LOAVES & FISHES FOR ST LOUIS: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
KY
TN
NC
SC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Jack and Robin Hake Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Jack and Robin Hake Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.7% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.1M · 27 repeat orgs$674k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
13

Total granted

$6.1M
$239k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+59%

Still filing today

44%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $435k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LEWIS & CLARK COMM COLLEGE FOUND
    8× · 2017–2024 · $225k · revenue +96%
  • SL
    ST LOUIS OVARIAN CANCER AWARENESS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $185k · revenue +59%
  • MM
    MATER MEDIA
    8× · 2018–2025 · $180k · revenue +212% · 77% of their budget

Funded once

  • VM
    VANDALIA MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION FUND USA
    one grant, 2024 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Word On Fire Catholic Ministries

Word on fire catholic ministries is a global media apostolate that supports the work of bishop robert barron and reaches millons of individuals to draw them back to or into the catholic faith.

Religion
2
The Dynamic Catholic Institute

The dynamic catholic mission is to re-energize the catholic church in america by developing world-class resources that inspire people to rediscover the genius of catholicism.

Religion
3
International Catholic Jurists Forum Inc

The International Catholic Jurists Forum (ICJF) was established to produce, compile, and share resources on fundamental human rights under attack in the regional and international human rights protection systems. It operates as a forum for…

Religion
4
Living His Life Abundantly International

To inform, instruct and inspire people through the media about the sacred scriptures and teachings of the roman catholic church

Religion
5
Priests for Life
Youth Development
6
Ave Maria Communications

Ave Maria Communications (AMC)employs radio, internet and other media to offer news, analysis, teaching, devotion and music to demonstrate Catholic values.

Religion
7
Society for Catholic Liturgy

The Society for Catholic Liturgy is a multidisciplinary association of Catholic scholars, teachers, pastors, and professionals - including architects and musicians - in the Anglophone world. Founded in 1995, the non-profit Society is…

Religion
8
Society for the Propagation of the Faith
9
Lutheran Heritage Foundation

To translate, publish, distribute, and introduce historic lutheran books and materials primarily used in the training of pastors, teachers, and lay leaders.

Religion
10
Keep the Faith Inc

Keep the faith is a catholic lay apostolate devoted to assist in the dissemanation of good catholic doctrine

Religion
11
Christ Our Life Catholic Conference

Present conferences that further the mission of the catholic church.

Religion
12
American Catholic Press

American catholic press exists to promote the good of the liturgy, academic research and instruction, especially in liturgical and theological studies and the spread of christion culture, especially hymns and other liturgical music.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loaves and Fishes for St Louis Inc and the most unlike its peers is Concerts for Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%14%5–10yr19%32%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%28%10–20yr16%34%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%7%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,543

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $1,350,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMISSION INTERNATIONAL — $1,014,000 · OtherMISSION INTERNATIONALOUR LITTLE HAVEN — $450,000 · OtherOUR LITTLE HAVENFELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTS — $310,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTSSAINT MARY CATHOLIC SCHOOL - ANGEL SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $250,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF SPRINGFIELD (NEWMAN CENTER) — $211,200 · OtherCARMEL OF ST JOSEPH — $195,000 · OtherST BONIFACE CHURCH — $175,600 · Other+26 more — $994,393 · Other+26 moreCatholics Come Home Inc — $455,000 · ReligionCatholics Come Home…ST PAUL CENTER FOR BIBLICAL THEOLOGY — $390,000 · ReligionST PAUL CENTER FOR …MATER MEDIA — $180,000 · ReligionMATER MEDIAOUR SORROWFUL MOTHERS MINISTRY — $75,000 · ReligionOUR SORROWFUL MOTHE…+2 more — $45,000 · ReligionLEWIS & CLARK COMM COLLEGE FOUND — $225,000 · EducationFATHER MCGIVNEY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL — $15,000 · EducationST LOUIS OVARIAN CANCER AWARENESS — $185,250 · HealthA Beacon of Light Pregnancy Help Center — $112,350 · Civil RightsWORLD PEDIATRICS — $87,000 · InternationalVAGABOND MISSIONS — $65,000 · Youth Development
Other$4,950,193Religion$1,145,000Education$240,000Health$185,250Civil Rights$112,350International$87,000Youth Development$65,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCatholics Come Home Inc — $455,000 over 9y, 28% of budgetOUR LITTLE HAVEN — $450,000 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetST PAUL CENTER FOR BIBLICAL THEOLOGY — $390,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetLEWIS & CLARK COMM COLLEGE FOUND — $225,000 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetST LOUIS OVARIAN CANCER AWARENESS — $185,250 over 6y, 9.0% of budgetMATER MEDIA — $180,000 over 8y, 77% of budgetA Beacon of Light Pregnancy Help Center — $112,350 over 7y, 16% of budgetWORLD PEDIATRICS — $87,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSAINT LOUIS BALLET COMPANY — $25,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetJewish Federation of St Louis — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPIRIT FILLED HEARTS MINISTRY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetLOAVES AND FISHES FOR ST LOUIS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFATHER MCGIVNEY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL — $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLIFT FOR LIFE ACADEMY INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONCERTS FOR HOPE — $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Catholics Come Home Inc
  • Who funds OUR LITTLE HAVEN
  • Who funds ST PAUL CENTER FOR BIBLICAL THEOLOGY
  • Who funds LEWIS & CLARK COMM COLLEGE FOUND
  • Who funds ST LOUIS OVARIAN CANCER AWARENESS
  • Who funds MATER MEDIA
  • Who funds A Beacon of Light Pregnancy Help Center
  • Who funds WORLD PEDIATRICS
  • Who funds OUR SORROWFUL MOTHERS MINISTRY
  • Who funds VAGABOND MISSIONS
  • Who funds CHILDRENS BIBLE STORY BOOKS IN EVERY HOME
  • Who funds SAINT LOUIS BALLET COMPANY
  • Who funds Jewish Federation of St Louis
  • Who funds SPIRIT FILLED HEARTS MINISTRY INC
  • Who funds LOAVES AND FISHES FOR ST LOUIS INC
  • Who funds FATHER MCGIVNEY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO19× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Jmg Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jack and Robin Hake Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jack and Robin Hake Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jack and Robin Hake Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph