Skip to content

· Private foundation

J Robert Westerman Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$12kHealth$11kHuman Services$10kFood & Nutrition$5kPhilanthropy$2kYouth Development$400Other$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$210k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KOSAIR CHARITIES$3,400
CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S$2,000
KENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY$1,500
EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION$1,500
SAVE A PET$1,500
DARE TO CARE FOOD BANK$1,500
NORTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$400
SEA SCOUTS OF KENTUCKY$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ARROW FUND: $323 → 15%EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION: $2k → 8%EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION: $1k → 8%EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION: $1k → 8%EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION: $1k → 8%EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION: $500 → 8%EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION: $500 → 8%EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION: $323 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$36k · 8 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against -27% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$36k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
-27%

Still filing today

88%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthAnimalsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KOSAIR CHARITIES COMMITTEE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $7k · revenue +64%
  • KH
    KENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $6k · revenue +56%
  • SI
    SAVE-A-PET INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • BT
    BETTER TOGETHER
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • AH
    ADDUS HOPE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
2
Animal Rescue Fund of the Hamptons Inc

THE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS ACTIVELY RESCUES CATS AND DOGS, PROVIDES QUALITY CARE AND OFFERS SANCTUARY UNTIL LOVING HOMES CAN BE FOUND. ARF's work with animals, within our community and throughout the organization is guided by…

Animals
3
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
4
Nevada Humane Society

To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.

Animals
5
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
6
Humane Pennsylvania

Humane pennsylvania empowers the people in our communities to increase their capacity to care for animals so that all animals are healthy, safe, and treated humanely.

Animals
7
Happy Paws Haven Co

Happy Paws Haven Co. is a foster based animal rescue agency that helps animals in need.

—
8
The Animal Haven Inc

The animal haven's misson is to provide a temporary, safe, caring and humane refuge for homeless dogs and cats and place these animals in quality adoptive homes.

Animals
9
Humane Pennsylvania Foundation

To encourage and motivate the making of gifts and donations by deed, will, or otherwise, for the advancement, promotion, extension, and maintenance of the various causes and objectives fostered by the humane pennsylvania.

Animals
10
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
11
Animals First Aid Nfp

Animals First Aid supports grassroots animal welfare groups worldwide by raising funds, sharing resources, and responding to urgent rescue and care needs.

Animals
12
Posh Pets Rescue Inc

Animal rescue, care and placement.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save-a-Pet Inc; the most unlike its peers is Equestrian Connection Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE: $5,873 · AnimalsKENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMA…SAVE-A-PET INC: $5,450 · AnimalsSAVE-A-PET INCKOSAIR CHARITIES COMMITTEE INC: $7,450 · HealthKOSAIR CHARITIES COMMITT…NORTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $1,200 · HealthNORTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDA…CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S: $4,000 · OtherCINCINNATI CHILDREN'SIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…BETTER TOGETHER: $1,000 · OtherBETTER TOGETHERADDUS HOPE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · OtherADDUS HOPE FOUNDATIONFRANCISCAN SHELTER HOUSE INC: $900 · OtherFRANCISCAN SHELTER HOUS…SEA SCOUTS OF KENTUCKY: $400 · OtherEquestrian Connection NFP: $5,823 · Human ServicesEquestrian Connec…THE ARROW FUND INC: $323 · Human ServicesDARE TO CARE INC: $4,051 · Food & NutritionDARE TO CAR…The Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $1,900 · Religion
Animals$11,323Health$8,650Other$8,300Human Services$6,146Food & Nutrition$4,051Religion$1,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKOSAIR CHARITIES COMMITTEE INC: $7,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE: $5,873 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEquestrian Connection NFP: $5,823 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSAVE-A-PET INC: $5,450 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDARE TO CARE INC: $4,051 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $1,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARROW FUND INC: $323 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KOSAIR CHARITIES COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Equestrian Connection NFP ↗
  • Who funds SAVE-A-PET INC ↗
  • Who funds DARE TO CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation) ↗
  • Who funds NORTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARROW FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Republic Bank Foundation IncKY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Republic Bank Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Baird Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization J Robert Westerman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from J Robert Westerman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on J Robert Westerman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph