Skip to content

Kentucky · Private foundation

J Robert Westerman Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
8
Grants FY2024
6
Organizations funded FY2023
17%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$1,500
Largest grant, FY2024
$3,400
Organizations funded a year
1 to 7
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
3
Total assets, FY2024
$210k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 17% of the organizations J Robert Westerman Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 29% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthAnimalsFood & NutritionReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving8$12k13%
FY20236$7k17%
FY20227$7k29%
FY20216$6k50%
FY20206$6k67%
FY20193$96967%
FY20181$5000%
FY20171$500n/a
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$12kHealth$11kHuman Services$10kFood & Nutrition$5kPhilanthropy$2kYouth Development$400Other$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Kosair Charities Committee Inc$7,45040%
Kentucky Humane Society - Animal Rescue$5,87360%
Equestrian Connection NFP$5,82370%
Save-A-Pet Inc$5,45050%
Dare to Care Inc$4,05130%
The Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation)$1,90020%
Norton Healthcare Foundation Inc$1,20030%
Franciscan Shelter House Inc$9001n/a
The Arrow Fund Inc$32310%

Plus 5 recipients with no EIN on record ($7k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget J Robert Westerman Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKosair Charities Committee Inc: $7,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKentucky Humane Society - Animal Rescue: $5,873 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEquestrian Connection NFP: $5,823 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSave-A-Pet Inc: $5,450 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDare to Care Inc: $4,051 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $1,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNorton Healthcare Foundation Inc: $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Arrow Fund Inc: $323 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Republic Bank Foundation IncKY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Republic Bank Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Baird Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare J Robert Westerman Foundation with peer funders

About J Robert Westerman Foundation

How much does J Robert Westerman Foundation give?
J Robert Westerman Foundation reported 8 grants totaling $12,200 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 7 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does J Robert Westerman Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Animals (29%), Health (26%), Human Services (24%).
Who are J Robert Westerman Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Kosair Charities Committee Inc ($7k), Kentucky Humane Society - Animal Rescue ($6k), Equestrian Connection NFP ($6k).
Does J Robert Westerman Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 17% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does J Robert Westerman Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as J Robert Westerman Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Republic Bank Foundation Inc, The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc, The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc.
Where is J Robert Westerman Foundation based?
J Robert Westerman Foundation is based in KY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on J Robert Westerman’s filings →

More from the funding graph