Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

J Love Legacy Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$76k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$4,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CROSSCUT MOUNTAIN SPORTS CENTER$25,000
BRIDGERCARE$10,000
BYEP$5,000
GALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUST$5,000
HAVEN$5,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY$5,000
BOZEMAN PUBLIC LIBRARY$4,000
NOLS$4,000
POLAR BEARS INTERNATIONAL$4,000
BOZEMAN SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$3,000
WESTMORE ASSOCIATION$3,000
BEFRIENDERS$2,000
BIENVENIDOS A GALLATIN VALLEY$1,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BEFRIENDERS: $2k → 10%BIENVENIDOS A GALLATIN VALLEY: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scenic Montana Trails
2
Save our Gallatin Front Inc
Environment
3
Bitterrooters for Planning

Responsible county planning

Environment
4
Boulder County Injured and Fallen Officer Foundation
Public Safety & Disaster
5
Gallatin Ice Foundation Inc

To provide the greater Gallatin valley community fun and affordable ice skating opportunities which include hockey, figure skating, and recreational ice skating for the citizens young and old, and of all skill levels.

Philanthropy
6
Gallatin Valley Foundation for Economic Development Inc Dba Prospera Foundation

The foundation works to strengthen the economy of gallatin county, montana through local business development activities in an effort to attract, retain and grow jobs and businesses throughout gallatin county.

Community Improvement
7
Blue Mountain Clinic Inc

The mission of Blue Mountain Clinic is to provide individualized, choice-based healthcare that respects the power of personal connection.

Health
8
Boulder Mountainbike Alliance

The Boulder Mountainbike Alliance exists to serve as a positive voice for mountain biking in the greater Boulder County, Colorado area by improving the trail experience for all users through social rides and events, advocacy, and trail…

Recreation & Sports
9
Big Sky Resort Association Inc

Serving as the voice of business, the big sky chamber of commerce champions a healthy economy and works collaboratively with community stakeholders as a conveyor and a catalyst to improve the overall quality of life in the region.

10
The Montana Land Reliance

The mission of the montana land reliance (mlr) is to partner with landowners to provide permanent protection for private lands that are significant for agricultural production, fish and wildlife habitat, and open space.

Environment
11
Crested Butte Land Trust

The mission of the crested butte land trust is to forever protect and steward open lands for vistas, recreation, wildlife and ranching, thus contributing to the preservation of gunnison countys unique heritage and quality of life

Environment
12
Gallatin Wildlife Association

Promote research and actions to save wildlife.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Gallatin Valley Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bienvenidos a Gallatin Valley. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BRIDGERCARE — $10,000 · OtherBRIDGERCAREBYEP — $5,000 · OtherBYEPHAVEN — $5,000 · OtherHAVENNOLS — $4,000 · OtherNOLSBOZEMAN LIBRARY FRIENDS AND FOUNDATION — $4,000 · OtherBOZEMAN LIBRARY FRIENDS AND FOUNDATIONWESTMORE ASSOCIATION INC — $3,000 · OtherWESTMORE ASSOCIATION INCBOZEMAN SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $3,000 · OtherBOZEMAN SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONCROSSCUT MOUNTAIN SPORTS CENTER — $25,000 · Recreation & SportsCROSSCUT MOUNTAIN SPORTS CENTERFAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROM…Befrienders — $2,000 · Human ServicesBefriendersBIENVENIDOS A GALLATIN VALLEY — $1,000 · Human ServicesBIENVENIDOS…GALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUST — $5,000 · EnvironmentPOLAR BEARS INTERNATIONAL — $4,000 · Animals
Other$34,000Recreation & Sports$25,000Human Services$8,000Environment$5,000Animals$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCROSSCUT MOUNTAIN SPORTS CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBRIDGERCARE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUST — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAVEN — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOZEMAN LIBRARY FRIENDS AND FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPOLAR BEARS INTERNATIONAL — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBefrienders — $2,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBIENVENIDOS A GALLATIN VALLEY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Split Rock Charitable Foundation IncFL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Split Rock Charitable Foundation Inc · One Valley Community Foundation · The Rieschel Foundation · Yellowstone Club Community Foundation · First Security Bank Foundation · Gilhousen Family Foundation · Greater Gallatin United Way Inc · Sample Foundation Inc · Stranahan Foundation · Treacy Foundation · Morton H Meyerson Family Foundation · Town Pump Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization J Love Legacy Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to J Love Legacy Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to J Love Legacy Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph