Skip to content

· Private foundation

J Kenneth & Alice Smith Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$101kPhilanthropy$94kHealth$46kHuman Services$43kYouth Development$32kReligion$26kAnimals$25kArts & Culture$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GUS WINTER FOUNDATION$12,000
DESERT WILLOW WILDLIFE REHAB CENTER$3,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$2,000
HARVEST MINISTRIES$2,000
CENTRAL OFFICE OF ALBUQUERQUE INC$2,000
SANTA FE MOUNTAIN CENTER INC$2,000
FRIENDS OF ROSWELL ANIMALS$2,000
COMMUNITY KITCHEN$2,000
DRY HARBOR$1,500
NM COALITION FOR LITERACY$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
FRIENDS OF BITTER LAKE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF SENM$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER FOR NM: $3k → 14%CHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER FOR NM: $3k → 14%CHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER FOR NM: $2k → 14%CHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER FOR NM: $2k → 14%CHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER FOR NM: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
VA
NM
TN
NC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$434k · 43 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
19

Total granted

$434k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+46%

Still filing today

28%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthReligionEnvironmentAnimalsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CK
    COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +36%
  • HM
    HARVEST MINISTRIES OF ROSWELL
    7× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +15%
  • NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $10k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF CHAVES CO
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • SR
    SPRING RIVER CORRIDOR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue -61%
  • RT
    RICHARD TETRICK FAMILY FDN
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Roswell Homeless Coalition Inc

Providing services for the homeless in roswell nm. this includes temporary housing services, health services and food services. the services are for men, women and children in need.

Housing & Shelter
2
Roswell Refuge for Battered Adults

To provide a safe haven for victims of domestic violence in chaves county new mexico. the refuge provides resources for life skills and other services.

—
3
Friends of the Pecos River
Environment
4
The Rockwell Museum
—
5
Nami Ruston Louisiana
Human Services
6
Animal Protection New Mexico

To protect animals by creating systemic change resulting in the humane treatment of all animals. we create policies, infrastructure, and services that protect animals and strengthen our communities, and we design and implement humane and…

Animals
7
Argos a Shelter Dog Rescue

The purpose of argos, a shelter dog rescue is: to rescue animals from situations that are abusive, endangering, or neglectful. to rescue animals in danger of being euthanized in new mexico shelters/pounds. to provide necessary veterinary…

Animals
8
National Alliance on Mental Illness New Mexico

The organization is dedicated to improving the quality of life for New Mexicans who suffer from mental illness.

—
9
New Mexico Scottish Rite Foundation
—
10
Roswell Historical Society

The mission of the Roswell Historical Society is to collect, preserve, share and promote the history of the City of Roswell and the surrounding districts.

Arts & Culture
11
People's Anti-Cruelty Assoc of Nm

Provide service and awareness of plight of abused/abandoned animals.

Animals
12
Nami White Mountains Az

We represent a community of people who are committed to relieving the pain and suffering of families and peers whose lives are impacted by a Mental Health Condition. The NAMI approach has been proven to work across the United States! NAMI…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Fe Mountain Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pnm Tnmp Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GUS WINTER ROSWELL ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $83,550 · OtherGUS WINTER ROSWELL ROTARY FOUNDATION INCGUS WINTER FOUNDATION: $78,000 · OtherGUS WINTER FOUNDATIONBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $14,000 · Other+54 more: $222,215 · Other+54 moreCOMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $17,000 · Food & NutritionNAMI National: $7,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 · HealthSANTA FE MOUNTAIN CENTER INC: $2,000 · HealthHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthHARVEST MINISTRIES OF ROSWELL: $14,000 · Religion+1 more: $180 · ReligionNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentSPRING RIVER CORRIDOR FOUNDATION: $4,000 · EnvironmentCHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER OF NM: $9,500 · Human ServicesEMBRACE INC: $500 · Human ServicesMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Philanthropy
Other$397,765Food & Nutrition$17,000Health$14,500Religion$14,180Environment$14,000Human Services$10,000Philanthropy$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGUS WINTER ROSWELL ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $83,550 over 2y, 52% of budgetCOMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $17,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetHARVEST MINISTRIES OF ROSWELL: $14,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER OF NM: $9,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNAMI National: $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDRY HARBOR INC: $6,500 over 3y, 13% of budgetHISTORICAL FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST NEW MEXICO: $5,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPRING RIVER CORRIDOR FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetROSWELL HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $3,600 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetASSURANCE HOME INC: $3,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA FE MOUNTAIN CENTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL - ROSWELL: $2,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetHistorical Society For Southeast New Mexico Inc: $1,600 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetPNM TNMP FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMBRACE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GUS WINTER ROSWELL ROTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds HARVEST MINISTRIES OF ROSWELL ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER OF NM ↗
  • Who funds NAMI National ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DRY HARBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds HISTORICAL FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SPRING RIVER CORRIDOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROSWELL HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSURANCE HOME INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Slayton FoundationNM17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Slayton Foundation · Rolla R Hinkle III Foundation · Miller Family Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization J Kenneth & Alice Smith Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from J Kenneth & Alice Smith Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to J Kenneth & Alice Smith Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to J Kenneth & Alice Smith Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on J Kenneth & Alice Smith Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph