Skip to content

· Private foundation

J Brian Walter and Karen M Walter Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$98k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$226kReligion$187kHuman Services$157kRecreation & Sports$47kHealth$46kAnimals$26kArts & Culture$7kPhilanthropy$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOTHER MARIE OF THE INCARNATION$30,000
BISHOP LYNCH HIGH SCHOOL$20,000
ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION$10,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES DALLAS$10,000
ST THOMAS AQUINAS CATHOLIC CHURCH$6,000
WHITE ROSE WOMEN'S CENTER$5,000
CORNERSTONE MINISTRIES$5,000
STATE FAIR OF TEXAS$5,000
LEGION OF CHRIST$2,500
RANCHO HUELLAS INC$1,000
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS #799$1,000
DALLAS MUSEUM OF ART$1,000
GUTHRIE BAPTIST CHURCH$500
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$500
1ST BAPTIST CHURCH BOERNE$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
IN
CA
UT
KY
MD
TN
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$534k · 17 repeat orgs$202k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
39

Total granted

$534k
$168k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+37%

Still filing today

29%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH'S HELPERS OF DALLAS INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $30k · revenue +43%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +49%
  • TS
    THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN
    2× · 2018–2020 · $15k · revenue +182%

Funded once

  • DO
    DIOCESE OF DALLAS
    one grant, 2021 · $40k
  • UW
    UTAH WILD SHEEP FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $23k · revenue +165%
  • SP
    ST PATRICK CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
2
Methodist Hospitals of Dallas

The primary mission or purpose of methodist health system is to serve people in defined service areas by meeting their health needs effectively and in a manner that reflects a "commitment to the christian concepts of life and learning" as…

Health
3
University of Dallas

The university of dallas is dedicated to the pursuit of wisdom, of truth, and of virtue as the proper and primary ends of education. the university seeks to educate its students so they may develop the intellectual and moral virtues,…

Education
4
University of Dayton

The university of dayton is a top-tier independent, catholic research educational institution founded in 1850. the primary exempt purpose is providing post secondary education through undergraduate, graduate, doctoral and continuing…

Education
5
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

—
6
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
7
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
8
Our Lady of the Lake University of San Antonio

As a catholic university sponsored by the sisters of divine providence, our lady of the lake university is a community whose members are committed to serve students by: (continued on schedule o).

Education
9
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
10
Texas Wesleyan University

Texas wesleyan university, guided by its deep methodist heritage, provides transformational learning experiences and research opportunities to a diverse group of students to develop their full potential as individuals and as members of the…

Education
11
University of Mary

The University of Mary exists to serve the religious, academic and cultural needs of the people in this region and beyond.(Continued on Schedule O)

Education
12
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of Dallas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Utah Wild Sheep Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BISHOP LYNCH HIGH SCHOOL: $209,000 · OtherBISHOP LYNCH HIGH SCHOOLBishops Annual Appeal: $100,000 · OtherBishops Annual AppealCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATIONDIOCESE OF DALLAS: $40,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF DALLASMOTHER MARIE OF THE INCARNATION: $30,000 · OtherST JOSEPH'S HELPERS OF DALLAS INC: $30,000 · Other+50 more: $206,670 · Other+50 moreCORNERSTONE MINISTRIES INC: $20,000 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,505 · HealthUTAH WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION: $23,000 · AnimalsUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $21,500 · Education+2 more: $600 · EducationSTATE FAIR OF TEXAS: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST TEXAS: $5,000 · PhilanthropyMuenster Volunteer Fire Department Inc: $5,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$665,670Health$26,505Animals$23,000Education$22,100Recreation & Sports$15,000Philanthropy$5,000Public Safety & Disaster$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JOSEPH'S HELPERS OF DALLAS INC: $30,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetUTAH WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION: $23,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $21,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE MINISTRIES INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSTATE FAIR OF TEXAS: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST TEXAS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMuenster Volunteer Fire Department Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,505 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Museum of Art: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS BALLET THEATER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKnights of Columbus Council#799: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWayCoolAngels Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHendrick Hospice Care: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JOSEPH'S HELPERS OF DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds UTAH WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds STATE FAIR OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Muenster Volunteer Fire Department Inc ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS SAFARI CLUB ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX16.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Scanlan Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization J Brian Walter and Karen M Walter Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from J Brian Walter and Karen M Walter Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to J Brian Walter and Karen M Walter Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to J Brian Walter and Karen M Walter Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on J Brian Walter and Karen M Walter’s filings →

    More from the funding graph