Skip to content
J&M Hock Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

J&M Hock Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.8MHealth$182kPublic Benefit$94kFood & Nutrition$65kYouth Development$54kHuman Services$29kReligion$20kPhilanthropy$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREENWICH BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $2k → 10%49ERS FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
NY
OH
CT
CA
VA
TN
NC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 22 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
18

Total granted

$2.2M
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+38%

Still filing today

64%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEnvironmentPublic BenefitHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $900k · revenue +47%
  • WS
    WATERSIDE SCHOOL INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $311k · revenue +34%
  • Cornell University
    5× · 2017–2021 · $175k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • SK
    SLOAN KETTERING
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • PO
    PART OF THE SOLUTIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +61%
  • KS
    KING SCHOOL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +61%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Mitchell College

Mitchell college educates students through a highly individualized educational approach that brings forward each student's potential, reveals their strengths, and fosters personal growth.

Education
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
6
The Bridge Academy Inc

The bridge academy, inc. was granted a charter to operate the bridge academy, a public school located in the city of bridgeport, ct. the school was founded in 1997 to provide college preparatory curriculum designed to overcome the…

Education
7
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
8
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Brooklyn Law School

To provide students with the knowledge, skills, ethical values needed for a career in law.

Education
11
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greenwich Academy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Greenwich Point Conservancy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
20/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $900,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYWATERSIDE SCHOOL INC: $311,000 · EducationWATERSIDE SCHOOL INCCornell University: $175,000 · EducationCornell UniversityGREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $157,500 · EducationGREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INCICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $100,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAIBRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC: $82,500 · EducationGREENWICH ACADEMY INC: $63,500 · Education+6 more: $49,150 · EducationLASALLE HIGH SCHOOL: $55,000 · OtherLASALLE HIGH SCHOO…MOUNT SINAI: $50,000 · OtherMOUNT SINAIMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $45,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KET…CHILDREN OF FALLEN PATRIOTS: $43,500 · OtherCHILDREN OF FALLEN…ONS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherONS FOUNDATIONP2 HOLDING: $27,500 · OtherP2 HOLDINGSLOAN KETTERING: $25,000 · OtherSLOAN KETTERINGNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC: $15,000 · OtherST CATHERINE OF SIENA AND ST AGNES: $15,000 · Other+11 more: $61,100 · Other+11 moreTEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC: $50,000 · Public BenefitBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH: $16,000 · Youth DevelopmentROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyWILLIAMS SYNDROME CHARITABLE FOUNDATION USA INC: $500 · PhilanthropyPART OF THE SOLUTION: $10,000 · Food & NutritionSAN FRANCISCO FORTY NINERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesHUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC: $1,500 · Human Services
Education$1,838,650Other$367,100Public Benefit$50,000Youth Development$16,000Philanthropy$10,500Food & Nutrition$10,000Human Services$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $900,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWATERSIDE SCHOOL INC: $311,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetCornell University: $175,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $157,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC: $82,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH ACADEMY INC: $63,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetP2 HOLDING: $27,500 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetVanderbilt University: $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH: $16,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBARBARAS HOUSE INC: $12,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFATHER VINCENT CAPODANNO HIGH SCHOOL: $10,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetPART OF THE SOLUTION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKING SCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DOOR - A CENTER OF ALTERNATIVES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FORTY NINERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRUCE MUSEUM INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL INC: $2,100 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAMS SYNDROME CHARITABLE FOUNDATION USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable F…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY12× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization J&M Hock Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from J&M Hock Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Barbaras House Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Greenwich: 7% of income from government
  • Bruce Museum Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to J&M Hock Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to J&M Hock Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on J&M Hock Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home