Skip to content

· Private foundation

Iworks Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$119kEducation$73kInternational$61kHuman Services$23kCommunity Improvement$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kPhilanthropy$6kEmployment$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,090
Median grant
6
States reached
$706k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Jude Childrens Research Hospit$10,000
FETNA$5,000
OPERATION UPLIFT$2,500
NDIA$2,000
Ivy and Pearls of Southern Maryland$1,090
WOUNDED WARRIOR$1,030
Liam$750
Balagan Saraswathi Charitable Trust$750
Individual grant recipient$400
Valluvan Tamil Academy$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 75% of grant dollars ($243k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 25% that went abroad ($80k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Global Connections to Employment: $3k → 16%Second Story: $1k → 6%Hindu American Community Services: $4k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 25% of all-years giving ($80k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$79k · 7 grants
Senegal$477 · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$91k · 12 repeat orgs$232k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
58

Total granted

$91k
$219k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+40%

Still filing today

17%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    ALSAC St Judes Hospital
    2× · 2022–2023 · $31k
  • F
    Fetna
    4× · 2017–2024 · $20k
  • FF
    Foundation for FCPS
    2× · 2018–2019 · $8k

Funded once

  • RF
    RAMKRISHNA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +20%
  • DC
    DIPR-PRNo228-Honble CM Press Re
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • NV
    Northern Virginia Community College Educational Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $26k · revenue +188%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manna Food Center Inc

Manna food center, inc strives to end hunger in our community through education, advocacy, and food distribution to individuals and partner agencies. manna's guiding principles are to be service-driven, community- centered and…

Food & Nutrition
2
Nourish Now Foundation Inc

To solve 2 major social issues simultaneously: food waste & hunger. nourish now is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit food bank, specialized in food recovery and providing donations from grocers, caterers, restaurants, bakeries, and other food donors…

Food & Nutrition
3
Real Food for Kids

Real Food for Kids' mission is to change eating behaviors and improve health outcomes for children and families in the Greater Washington Region through sustainable access to real whole foods, impactful nutrition education, and local…

Youth Development
4
The Houston Food Bank

Houston food bank's mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided access to 136 million nutritious meals in 18 counties in southeast texas through our 1,600 community partners which includes food pantries, soup…

—
5
Mary's Meals Usa Inc

To raise donations to (i) provide a daily meal in a place of education for children in the world's poorest communities; (ii) occasionally provide relief for those suffering, in any part of the world, as a result of humanitarian crises…

International
6
The Kimmy Duong Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Blue Ridge Area Food Bank Inc

The food bank purchases food and obtains donations of food from the united states department of agriculture, manufacturers, distributors, retailers, growers and community members for distribution to people in need in 25 counties and eight…

—
8
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
9
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
10
Arcadia Food Inc

Cultivate local food systems prioritizing health, equity, and sustainability, from farm forward.

Food & Nutrition
11
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
12
Arlington Food Assistance Center

To provide dignified access to free groceries for qualified families in Arlington, VA and surrounding counties.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loudoun Hunger Relief Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DIPR-PRNo228-Honble CM Press Re: $50,000 · OtherDIPR-PRNo228-Honble CM Press ReALSAC St Judes Hospital: $31,000 · OtherALSAC St Judes HospitalNorthern Virginia Community College Educational Foundation Inc: $26,000 · OtherNorthern Virginia Community College Educational Foundation IncFetna: $20,250 · OtherFetnaTN Govt Hospital: $12,386 · OtherSt Jude Childrens Research Hospit: $10,000 · Other+57 more: $93,890 · Other+57 moreRAMKRISHNA FOUNDATION: $50,300 · InternationalRAMKRISHNA FOUNDA…+1 more: $165 · InternationalTAMIL NADU FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · PhilanthropyOUR MILITARY KIDS INC: $6,465 · Philanthropy+1 more: $100 · PhilanthropyHINDU AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesGlobal Connections to Employment Inc: $2,500 · Human ServicesABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHEYNEY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationChildren of Fallen Patriots Foundation: $1,000 · EducationValluvan Tamil Academy: $300 · EducationBALVIKAS INC: $2,350 · Youth DevelopmentTAMIL SANGAM OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$243,526International$50,465Philanthropy$14,065Human Services$7,000Education$3,300Youth Development$2,350Arts & Culture$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAMKRISHNA FOUNDATION: $50,300 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetNorthern Virginia Community College Educational Foundation Inc: $26,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTAMIL NADU FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetOUR MILITARY KIDS INC: $6,465 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHINDU AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $3,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetGlobal Connections to Employment Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBALVIKAS INC: $2,350 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFAIRFAX COUNTY POLICE ASSOCIATION: $2,090 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTAMIL SANGAM OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $2,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTHE CHEYNEY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $1,240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren of Fallen Patriots Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $972 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $388 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetValluvan Tamil Academy: $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLOUDOUN HUNGER RELIEF INC: $273 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $198 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $165 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $165 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOUDOUN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETASTATIC BREAST CANCER NETWORK: $50 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAMKRISHNA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Northern Virginia Community College Educational Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TAMIL NADU FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR MILITARY KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds HINDU AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Global Connections to Employment Inc ↗
  • Who funds BALVIKAS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAIRFAX COUNTY POLICE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds TAMIL SANGAM OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHEYNEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds ABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Children of Fallen Patriots Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

America's CharitiesVA13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: America's Charities · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Iworks Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Iworks Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 96%
  • Global Connections to Employment Inc: 96% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Iworks Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Iworks Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Iworks’ filings →

More from the funding graph