Loading…
· Public charity
IT'S TIME TEXAS INC
Provides health-and-fitness based resources to individuals & community institutions.
$117k
Granted FY2024
1
Grants
1
Communities
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0179% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Health$235kHuman Services$172kCommunity Improvement$48kYouth Development$40kEducation$6kOther$134k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
—
2021
collaborative innovationsinnovations health
2022
innovationgalvestonhealth educationfood
2023
—
2024
pdn
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$99,611
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
- PASO DEL NORTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$99,611
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $172k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19% — the area typically sits at 16%. 82% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
South Texas Rural Health Services
South Texas Rural Health Services, Inc. provides charitable health services, including the recruitment of health care personnel to the rural service area, and primarily serves the low income population.
Health
2
Vida Y Salud Health Systems Inc
Provides health services to the people of Zavala,Dimmit,LaSalle,Uvalde and surrounding counties. Services include medical,dental,food and nutrition education,immunizations, and glaucoma screening.
Health
3
Atascosa Health Center Inc
Health care services are provided to low to moderate income families who are residents of South Texas. Services are provided at a low cost are based on ability to pay.
Health
4
Paso Del Norte Health Information
Paso del Norte Health Information Exchange exists to promote the health of El Paso County and surrounding communities by facilitating the creation and operation of a health information exchange.
Health
5
Community Health Center of Lubbock Inc
Provide quality primary and preventative health care services to those in need.
Health
6
Society of St Vincent De Paul Community Outreach of North Texas
The St. Vincent Center (SVC) provides a Hub of Collaboration and Services for neighbors in South Dallas in need of Employment & Education, Health & Nutrition, and Emergency Assistance.
Food & Nutrition
7
East Texas Community Clinic Inc
Provides access to high quality primary care to any resident in east texas.
—
8
United Methodist Western Kansas Mexican-
Genesis family health is strengthening communities by providing high quality, comprehensive health and wellness services.
—
9
El Centro Del Barrio Inc
CentroMed is an integrated primary care network of clinics providing accessible services of superior quality
Human Services
10
Vista Community Clinic
The mission of Vista Community Clinic is to advance community health and hope by providing access to premier health services and education for those who need it most.
Health
11
Health Services of North Texas Inc
Improving the quality of life for all north texans through medical care, support services and advocacy.
Health
12
Clinica De Salud Del Valle De Salinas
Clinica de Salud de Valle de Salinas is dedicated to providing comprehensive healthcare to the men, women, and children with an emphasis on working with farmworker families and the agriculture community.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Giving Austin Labor Support and the most unlike its peers is Valley Baptist Legacy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$234,611Human Services$171,500Other$133,500Community Improvement$48,000Youth Development$40,000Education$6,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PASO DEL NORTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GIVING AUSTIN LABOR SUPPORT INC ↗
- Who funds SU CLINICA FAMILIAR ↗
- Who funds GALVESTON'S OWN FARMERS MARKET ↗
- Who funds NUTRITION AND SERVICES FOR SENIORS ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN YOUTH & COMMUNITY FARM DBA URBAN ROOTS ↗
- Who funds GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY ↗
- Who funds PROYECTO JUAN DIEGO INC ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT'S HOUSE ↗
- Who funds SON-SHINE OUTREACH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LA UNION DEL PUEBLO ENTERO ↗
- Who funds CATCH GLOBAL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas IncTX17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · Valley Baptist Legacy Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation IT'S TIME TEXAS INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GIVING AUSTIN LABOR SUPPORT INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~11 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 4 filed years.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +86% since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 273448123 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on GIVING AUSTIN LABOR SUPPORT INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 11 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 9% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to It's Time Texas Inc?
Find your warmest path to It's Time Texas Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines