· Private foundation
Isaiah 5812 Foundation Inc
TO FULFILL NEEDS AS GOD LEADS.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $408k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $979k
- $250k+2 grants · $760k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL | $500,000 |
| SOUTHEAST CHRISTIAN CHURCH | $260,000 |
| 39 INDIVIDUALS | $231,501 |
| THRIVE CHURCH | $186,083 |
| TNL CHURCH | $149,001 |
| CHRISTIAN COVENANT ACADEMY | $130,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $68,263 |
| SECOR | $60,000 |
| CASA | $53,834 |
| MIDDLE SCHOOL MATCHUP | $50,000 |
| SOUTHEAST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| COLORADO NATIVE PROJECT | $49,440 |
| PUCUSANA PROJECT | $49,021 |
| TRIAD | $41,652 |
| JUDI'S HOUSE | $39,448 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHRIVE CHURCH INCORPORATED2× · 2022–2023 · $1.3M
- CLCOLORADO LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION2× · 2023–2024 · $1.0M
- SCSOUTHEAST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF JEFFERSON COUNTY KENTUCKY INC2× · 2022–2023 · $125k
Funded once
- MDMICHELLE DAVISone grant, 2023 · $320k · revenue -23% · 100% of their budget
- CRCOLORADO ROCKIES BIBLE CAMP AND CONFERENCE INCone grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +17%
- VMVikas Missionone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide state of the art water filters into the hands of mothers and train them to provide clean water for themselves , their families and others in their communities.
SOS provides assistance to poor and marginalized people in the USA & other countries. SOS feeds the hungry, drills water wells, contributes to schools and operates an orphanage. SOS also rescues and rehabilitates victims of sex trafficking.
We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.
To glorify the Lord Jesus Christ by ministering to orphans around the world by meeting spiritual, physical, emotional, and educational needs.
Mercy Projects is a Christian 501c3 organization with a "Christ-centered, family-focused" vision of assisting vulnerable children and families. We work primarily in Ukraine, Armenia, and Kosovo.
To motivate and mobilize the church and community to care for the orphans and vulnerable children.
Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.
Alternatives Pregnancy Center exists to care for Denver-area women and men in pregnancy-related crisis and offer them meaningful alternatives to abortion. We seek to meet emotional, physical, and spriritual needs, enabling and encouraging…
Partnering with Indigenous Leaders to Spread the Gospel, Serve Others, and Build Community
Children of Promise provides nutrition education and health care for children in need in developing nations.
Provides aid to orphans in devastated areas, primarily Uganda, India, and Myanmar. Children are directly sponsored and specific projects which will benefit the children that are underwritten. Projects include hospitals, schools, and other…
The mission of Selah International Counseling Ministries is to glorify God as we serve and equip His church, providing leadership and service through counseling, counseling resources, and counseling training.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Set Free Alliance (F/K/a Water of Life) and the most unlike its peers is Michelle Davis. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 14. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 19% of your grantees by number, and just 16% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MICHELLE DAVIS ↗
- Who funds PUCUSANA PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds SECOR ↗
- Who funds Alternatives Pregnancy Center ↗
- Who funds Southeast Christian School ↗
- Who funds JUDI'S HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Colorado Native Outreach Project ↗
- Who funds COLORADO ROCKIES BIBLE CAMP AND CONFERENCE INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE HAVEN CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
- Who funds DONATION HOUSE ↗
- Who funds THE OUTREACH HOUSE ↗
- Who funds EVERYWHERE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds SET FREE ALLIANCE (F/K/A WATER OF LIFE) ↗
- Who funds Vikas Mission ↗
- Who funds Lane Thomas Foundation ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds MIO Frontiers ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Isaiah 5812 Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Isaiah 5812 Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Isaiah 5812 Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.