Skip to content

· Private foundation

Irving May and Edith H May Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$49kHuman Services$48kAnimals$31kEducation$9kPublic Benefit$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kPhilanthropy$4kCrime & Legal$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$452k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRADER-WILLI SYNDROME ASSOCIATION$2,500
PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK$2,000
SCOLIOSIS RESEARCH SOCIETY$2,000
VCU - MASSEY CANCER CENTER - MASSEY'S MAGICAL TOUCH SALON$2,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE GREATER PHILADELPHIA$1,500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE GREATER CHARLOTTE$1,500
AMERICAN LEGION BON AIR POST 354$1,200
SOUTH EAST CORGI RESCUE$1,200
TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION$1,000
FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER$1,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
CADILLAC AREA HONOR GUARD$1,000
FIELD INSTITUTE OF TACOS$1,000
SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMPANIONS FOR HEROES: $1k → 14%COMPANIONS FOR HEROES: $907 → 14%COMPANIONS FOR HEROES: $606 → 14%COMPANIONS FOR HEROES: $500 → 14%COMPANIONS FOR HEROES: $500 → 14%COMPANIONS FOR HEROES: $500 → 14%COMPANIONS FOR HEROES: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
WI
MI
NY
IA
PA
CT
CA
VA
NM
NC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$149k · 28 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
9

Total granted

$149k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
-11%

Still filing today

46%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +24%
  • SC
    SOUTHEAST CORGI RESCUE INCORPORATED
    7× · 2019–2025 · $8k · revenue +45%
  • TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7k · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • DT
    DUNCAN TREE VENTURES INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -82%
  • GM
    GRYMES MEMORIAL SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +1%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATIO OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Summit Assistance Dogs

Summit assistance dogs is a nonprofit organization that creates life-changing partnerships by providing highly-trained mobility assistance dogs for people living with disabilities.

Human Services
2
Hero Dogs Inc

Hero Dogs improves the quality of life of our nations heroes and enhances the services of community organizations by placing assistance dogs with customized training & lifetime support.

Human Services
3
Pets for Patriots Inc

The organization's mission is to transform the lives of veterans by helping them save an at risk shelter dog or cat, and to end all animal homelessness in the us and enrich the lives of men and women who serve, and have served our country.…

Animals
4
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
5
Paws With a Cause

To transform lives and strengthen communities through partnerships with custom trained working dogs.

Human Services
6
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
7
Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research

The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…

Philanthropy
8
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
9
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
10
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
11
Petfinder Foundation

To prevent the euthanasia of adoptable pets and support animal welfare groups to this end.

Animals
12
Sansum Diabetes Research Institute

Dedicated to improving the lives of people impacted by diabetes through research, education and care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Richmond Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals; the most unlike its peers is Southeast Corgi Rescue Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VCU - MASSEY CANCER CENTER - MASSEY'S MAGICAL TOUCH SALON: $15,500 · OtherVCU - MASSEY CANCER CENTER - MASSEY'S MAGICAL TOUCH SALONRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $14,100 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEAMERICAN LEGION BON AIR POST 354: $9,600 · OtherAMERICAN LEGION BON AIR POST 354PALM BEACH ZOO - EDITH & ROBERT CALLAHAN ENDOWMENT FUND: $9,000 · OtherPALM BEACH ZOO - EDITH & ROBERT CALLAHAN ENDOWMENT FUNDJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $9,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICESCADILLAC AREA HONOR GUARD: $6,500 · OtherCADILLAC AREA HONOR GUARDAMERICAN RED CROSS: $4,600 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION: $4,325 · OtherSCOLIOSIS RESEARCH SOCIETY: $4,000 · OtherPENN MEDICINE: $4,000 · OtherUnited Jewish Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc: $3,700 · Other+18 more: $23,233 · Other+18 morePANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $15,500 · HealthPANCREATIC C…THE JARED BOX PROJECT: $2,500 · HealthTHE JARED BO…+1 more: $500 · HealthSOUTHEAST CORGI RESCUE INCORPORATED: $8,400 · AnimalsSOUTHEAST C…RICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $6,086 · AnimalsRICHMOND SO…CORGIAID INC: $2,741 · AnimalsCORGIAID IN…+1 more: $200 · AnimalsTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $8,000 · EducationGRYMES MEMORIAL SCHOOL INC: $1,000 · EducationTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION: $6,950 · Public BenefitCompanions for Heroes: $4,513 · Human ServicesSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$107,558Health$18,500Animals$17,427Education$9,000Public Benefit$6,950Human Services$4,513Crime & Legal$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $15,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEAST CORGI RESCUE INCORPORATED: $8,400 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION: $6,950 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $6,086 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCompanions for Heroes: $4,513 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSCOLIOSIS RESEARCH SOCIETY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Jewish Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc: $3,700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCORGIAID INC: $2,741 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHE JARED BOX PROJECT: $2,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRADER-WILLI SYNDROME ASSOCIATION (USA): $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDUNCAN TREE VENTURES INCORPORATED: $2,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetGRYMES MEMORIAL SCHOOL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Foundation of Shalom Park: $640 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL UNION MISSION: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIGNATURE THEATRE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPIEDMONT ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST CORGI RESCUE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Companions for Heroes ↗
  • Who funds SCOLIOSIS RESEARCH SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds United Jewish Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc ↗
  • Who funds CORGIAID INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JARED BOX PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION ↗
  • Who funds PRADER-WILLI SYNDROME ASSOCIATION (USA) ↗
  • Who funds DUNCAN TREE VENTURES INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Field Institute of Taos ↗
  • Who funds GRYMES MEMORIAL SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds The Foundation of Shalom Park ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL UNION MISSION ↗
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
  • Who funds SIGNATURE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds PIEDMONT ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Irving May and Edith H May Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Irving May and Edith H May Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Irving May and Edith H May’s filings →

More from the funding graph