· Public charity
Irving J Symons Foundation
To carry out charitable and educational activities and to support, benefit, and carry out the purposes of the Sonora Area Foundation, whose charitable activities benefit Tuolumne County and its citizens.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $185k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $662k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Sonora Area Foundation | $244,775 |
| Resiliency Village | $100,000 |
| Friends of Tuolumne County Lodge B | $100,000 |
| Symons Family Fund | $67,560 |
| Sierra Repertory Theatre | $50,000 |
| Youth Sports Foundation | $50,000 |
| Tuolumne Park and Recreation | $50,000 |
| Interfaith | $35,000 |
| Sierra Foothills Residential Care | $30,000 |
| MiWuk Sugar Pine Fire Protection | $25,145 |
| Sierra Bible Church | $25,000 |
| Christian Heights Church | $20,000 |
| TuCare | $20,000 |
| Sonora Cat Rescue | $20,000 |
| The Jack and Buena Foundation | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $466k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $355k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YSYOUTH SPORTS FOUNDATION OF TUOLUMNE COUNTY3× · 2021–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +6% · 61% of their budget
- SRSIERRA REPERTORY THEATRE INC3× · 2021–2024 · $125k · revenue +24%
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF TUOLUMNE COUNTY INC4× · 2020–2023 · $86k · revenue +128%
Funded once
- FHFAITH HOME TEEN CHALLENGEone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +3%
- GSGIVE SOMEONE A CHANCEgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +58% · 76% of their budget
- SSSOUTHSIDE SENIOR SERVICES INCone grant, 2023 · $26k · revenue -9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To operate a museum and library open to the public
Provide relief for the unhoused residents of El Dorado County
Fire safety, fuels reduction, and watershed protection for the county of seirra.
To improve the visual quality of the Tahoe Basin portion of El Dorado County through community education, citizen involvement and enforcecment of litter and nuisance ordinances.
Promote fire safety by providing information, education, support incentives and projects that encourage fire safety in a service area in eastern Fresno and Tulare counties.
CSERC protects water, wildlife, and wild places of the Northern Yosemite region.
To reduce the risk of loss of life and property in the Timberview and adjacent areas through promotion of fire safety, education, prevention and suppression as well as related emergency procedures.
Cleanup and garbage removal
Fire suppression, rescue and emergency medical first responders in this remote, rural coastal area. sonoma county service area #25.
Creating positive outcomes for mountain biking
To bring together the resources of public and private resource organizations in the interests of wildfire prevention loss and mitigation.
Deter crime in Tehama County
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Faith Home Teen Challenge and the most unlike its peers is Tuolumne Safe. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Sonora Area Foundation ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SPORTS FOUNDATION OF TUOLUMNE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Symons Family Fund ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SIERRA REPERTORY THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds Center for a Non Violent Community ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OFTUOLUMNE COUNTY LODGE BUILDING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds RESILIENCY VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF TUOLUMNE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds TUOLUMNE COUNTY ALLIANCE FOR RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT INC ↗
- Who funds WATCH RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds TUOLUMNE PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT ECONOMIC SERVICES ↗
- Who funds FAITH HOME TEEN CHALLENGE ↗
- Who funds TUOLUMNE COUNTY SHERIFF'S POSSE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds GIVE SOMEONE A CHANCE ↗
- Who funds MOTHER LODE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Nancys Hope Community Closet ↗
- Who funds SIERRA FOOTHILLS RESIDENTIAL CARE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHSIDE SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds MI-WUK SUGAR PINE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AUXILIARY ↗
- Who funds Sierra Senior Providers Inc ↗
- Who funds TUOLUMNE FIRE SAFE COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds The Jack and Buena Foundation ↗
- Who funds Sonora Cat Rescue ↗
- Who funds TUOLUMNE SAFE ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH NORTHEASTERN & CENTRAL CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds JERRY AND PAULA BAKER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Tuolumne River Preservation Trust dba Yosemite Rivers Alliance ↗
- Who funds HISTORIC SONORA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sonora Area Foundation · Sonora Community Hospital dba Adventist Health Sonora · Symons Family Fund · Stanislaus Community Foundation · California Fire Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Irving J Symons Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Irving J Symons Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Irving J Symons Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.