Skip to content

· Private foundation

Irving and Birdella White Foundatio

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$400
Largest
01What it funds
0172% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$12kInternational$8kEducation$7kHuman Services$4kYouth Development$3kAnimals$2kRecreation & Sports$2kPublic Benefit$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
2
States reached
$30k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE 4 THE CHILDREN$400
NEW HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH$400
GOSPEL MISSION INC$250
SOJOUN CHURCH$250
YOUNG LIFE$165
WEST SIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH$120
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHRIST'S HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 10%CHRIST'S HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $742 → 10%CHRIST'S HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $742 → 10%CHRIST'S HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $312 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
AZ
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$32k · 20 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against -10% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
49

Total granted

$32k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
-10%

Still filing today

25%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $935 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHRISTS HOPE U S A INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $3k · revenue +14%
  • UN
    UNKNOWN NATIONS
    5× · 2017–2021 · $2k · revenue +121%
  • SF
    SET FREE MINISTRIES
    2× · 2020–2022 · $1k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
2
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
3
Christian Leaders for Africa Inc

Christian leaders from africa promotes christian theological training & education of local leaders in kenya and throughout africa. it invests in undergraduate, masters, and phd scholarships, faculty support for african professors and…

Religion
4
Every Child Ministries

Christian mission offering hope to the forgotten children of africa and training leaders and teachers for african children.

International
5
Freedom in Christ Ministries

To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.

Religion
6
World Hope Ministries International

Training pastors, growing churches, and transforming communities for christ.

—
7
Lifeway Mission International

Provide humanitarian aid and christian discipleship.

Human Services
8
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
9
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
10
Kingdom Advisors Inc

Kingdom advisors is a discipleship ministry serving christian financial professionals. the organization encourages, educates, and empowers christian financial professionals with biblical wisdom to be effective disciples of jesus christ in…

Religion
11
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
12
Westminster Academy

The school provides classical christian education to students in grades junior kindergarten through twelve.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bright Hope International; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $4,129 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $3,515 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $3,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $2,765 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLAKESHORE RESCUE MISSIONS: $2,364 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $1,963 · OtherSOJOUN CHURCH: $1,955 · Other+55 more: $25,950 · Other+55 moreHOPE 4 THE CHILDREN: $5,400 · EducationHOPE 4 THE…THE PATHFINDER SCHOOL INC: $400 · EducationTHE PATHFI…40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $325 · Education+1 more: $50 · EducationBRIGHT HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $3,750 · ReligionBRIGHT HOP…SET FREE MINISTRIES: $1,250 · ReligionSET FREE M…YOUTHVISION INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 · ReligionYOUTHVISIO…+1 more: $48 · ReligionCHRISTS HOPE U S A INC: $3,038 · Human ServicesUNKNOWN NATIONS: $2,167 · InternationalYOUNG LIFE: $165 · Youth DevelopmentLONG LAKE ASSOCIATION INC: $135 · Environment
Other$45,941Education$6,175Religion$6,048Human Services$3,038International$2,167Youth Development$165Environment$135

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRIGHT HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $3,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTS HOPE U S A INC: $3,038 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNKNOWN NATIONS: $2,167 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSET FREE MINISTRIES: $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTHVISION INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTRAVERSE BAY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PATHFINDER SCHOOL INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASK CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION: $380 over 1y, 0.0% of budget40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $325 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $165 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEvery Man A Warrior Inc: $48 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOPE 4 THE CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTS HOPE U S A INC ↗
  • Who funds UNKNOWN NATIONS ↗
  • Who funds SET FREE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHVISION INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds TRAVERSE BAY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE PATHFINDER SCHOOL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Barnabas FoundationIL13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Barnabas Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Irving and Birdella White Foundatio funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Irving and Birdella White Foundatio. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Irving and Birdella White Foundatio?

    Find your warmest path to Irving and Birdella White Foundatio through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Irving and Birdella White Foundatio’s filings →

    More from the funding graph