Skip to content

· Private foundation

Irene C Finkelstein Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$79k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$156kEducation$114kArts & Culture$93kYouth Development$69kFood & Nutrition$69kInternational$48kReligion$43kHuman Services$29kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $42k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$609k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CMTA - CHARCOL MARIE TOOTH ASSOCIATION$12,000
UC BERKELEY SCHOOL OF LAW$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF LOS ANGELES$10,000
THE HARMONY PROJECT$10,000
FEED MY POOR INC$6,000
JEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF LOS ANGELES$5,000
JEWISH HEALING CENTER$5,000
LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC$5,000
WESTIDE FOOD BANK$4,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$4,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$3,000
MIRACLE FLIGHTS FOR KIDS$2,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$2,000
CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3k → 14%LEARNING ALLY INC: $2k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3k → 14%LEARNING ALLY INC: $2k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3k → 14%LEARNING ALLY INC: $1k → 11%EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3k → 14%LEARNING ALLY INC: $1k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3k → 14%LEARNING ALLY INC: $1k → 11%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $1k → 14%LEARNING ALLY INC: $1k → 11%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $1k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $1k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $1k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $1k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $1k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $1k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $1k → 14%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$652k · 29 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +66% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
9

Total granted

$652k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+66%

Still filing today

69%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $85k · revenue +92%
  • HP
    Harmony Project
    7× · 2017–2024 · $46k · revenue +88%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $38k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • BH
    BOALT HALL SCHOOL OF LAWS FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • TM
    THE MUSIC CENTER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La's Best

La's best provides free supervised before and after-school activities to over 15,000 children at 200 schools in los angeles unified school district (lausd).

Education
2
All About Kids La
Philanthropy
3
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
4
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
5
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
6
Project Angel Food

Project angel food (the organization) improves health and fights food insecurity for critically ill individuals in los angeles county through its medically tailored meal program and nutrition counseling. for over 35 years, they have served…

Health
7
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
8
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
9
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
10
Hollywood Food Coalition

Hollywood food coalition welcomes people to dinner each night. we rescue and redistribute food daily to other organizations. we care for our immediate community through our wellness program. we build community with and through our…

—
11
Los Angeles Education Partnership

To advance educational equity. together with families, schools and the community, facilitate access to and opportunities for quality educational and wellness practices so that children thrive from diapers to diplomas.

—
12
Para Los Ninos

Para los ninos (pln) is a nonprofit organization that partners with children, youth, and their families through integrated education, wellness, support, and advocacy to address individual and systemic barriers and create pathways to…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Create Now Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pickleberry Pie Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CMTA - CHARCOL MARIE TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $66,000 · OtherCMTA - CHARCOL MARIE TOOTH ASSOCIATIONUC BERKELEY SCHOOL OF LAW: $60,000 · OtherUC BERKELEY SCHOOL OF LAWIndividual grant recipient: $42,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJEWISH HEALING CENTER: $40,000 · OtherJEWISH HEALING CENTERLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $16,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANKMIRACLE FLIGHTS FOR KIDS: $13,500 · OtherBOALT HALL SCHOOL OF LAWS FUND: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherHEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 · Other+8 more: $27,500 · Other+8 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $85,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENT…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthJEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES: $38,000 · Youth DevelopmentJEWISH BIG BR…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LOS ANGELES INC: $29,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITIES I…FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $14,500 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDSHIP CI…Harmony Project: $46,000 · EducationHarmony Pr…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $13,000 · EducationWASHINGTON…+1 more: $2,000 · EducationWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $29,500 · Food & NutritionFeed My Poor Inc: $15,000 · Food & NutritionLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $35,000 · Arts & CulturePICKLEBERRY PIE INC: $3,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesChildren of the Night: $8,000 · Human ServicesLearning Ally Inc: $8,000 · Human ServicesResource for Education Advocacy Communication and Housing: $4,000 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES: $2,000 · Human Services+2 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $38,000 · International
Other$295,000Health$86,000Youth Development$81,500Education$61,000Food & Nutrition$44,500Arts & Culture$39,000Human Services$39,000International$38,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $85,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHarmony Project: $46,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES: $38,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $38,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $29,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LOS ANGELES INC: $29,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFeed My Poor Inc: $15,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $14,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $13,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetChildren of the Night: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetIMPERIAL VALLEY FOOD BANK: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLearning Ally Inc: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetResource for Education Advocacy Communication and Housing: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDISCOVERY ARTS: $3,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPICKLEBERRY PIE INC: $3,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Medical Angels: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE THE MISSION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHAREWELL: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds Harmony Project ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Feed My Poor Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Children of the Night ↗
  • Who funds IMPERIAL VALLEY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Learning Ally Inc ↗
  • Who funds Resource for Education Advocacy Communication and Housing ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVERY ARTS ↗
  • Who funds PICKLEBERRY PIE INC ↗
  • Who funds CREATE NOW INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Medical Angels ↗
  • Who funds HOPE THE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds SHAREWELL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA14.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Irene C Finkelstein Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Irene C Finkelstein Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Learning Ally Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Irene C Finkelstein Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Irene C Finkelstein Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Irene C Finkelstein’s filings →

More from the funding graph