Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ira & Marylou Alpert Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$57k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Civil Rights$96kHuman Services$71kPhilanthropy$24kInternational$21kArts & Culture$20kCrime & Legal$17kFood & Nutrition$11kReligion$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$276k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST CATHERINE'S CENTER FOR CHILDREN$14,000
REALNESS PROJECT$6,000
THE BRIDGE FUND OF WESTCHESTER$5,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$5,000
AFYA FOUNDATION$5,000
NEIGHBOR'S LINK$4,000
CHEF ANN FOUNDATION$3,000
MEDIATORS FOUNDATION$2,500
GROWING HOME$2,500
DANCE TO BE FREE$2,000
RETURN TO FREEDOM$2,000
NPR FOUNDATION$2,000
KATONAH MUSEUM$1,000
YIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH$1,000
COLUMBUS COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK INC: $1k → 17%NEIGHBOR'S LINK: $4k → 9%NEIGHBOR'S LINK: $2k → 9%NEIGHBOR'S LINK: $2k → 9%NEIGHBOR'S LINK: $2k → 9%NEIGHBOR'S LINK: $2k → 9%NEIGHBOR'S LINK: $1k → 9%AFYA FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%AFYA FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%AFYA FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%AFYA FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%AFYA FOUNDATION: $2k → 9%AFYA FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%AFYA FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$269k · 14 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
6

Total granted

$269k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+12%

Still filing today

86%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEducationReligionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    ST CATHERINE'S CENTER FOR CHILDREN
    5× · 2021–2025 · $58k · revenue +14%
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +10%
  • TA
    THE AFYA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $18k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • R
    RECONSIDER
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • KM
    KATONAH MUSEUM OF ART
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +12%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
3
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
4
Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University Inc

The Knight First Amendment Institute defends the freedoms of speech and the press in the digital age through strategic litigation, research, public advocacy and public education. Our aim is to promote a system of free expression that is…

Education
5
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
6
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
7
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
8
Abolitionist Law Center

Legal services & public interest law.

Crime & Legal
9
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Pro Publica Inc

Pro publica is an independent, non-profit, pulitzer prize-winning newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories. [see continuation on schedule o] we produce…

Arts & Culture
12
Civil Rights Corps

We work to shift power to community-led movements, particularly those led by black and brown people who are most affected by this legal system, so they can build sufficient power to create structural change. continued on schedule o.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mediators Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dance to Be Free. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST CATHERINE'S CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $58,000 · OtherST CATHERINE'S CENTER FOR CHILDRENTHE BRIDGE FUND OF WESTCHESTER: $24,000 · OtherTHE BRIDGE FUND OF WESTCHESTERRECONSIDER: $10,000 · OtherRECONSIDERRETURN TO FREEDOM INC: $4,000 · Other+5 more: $10,500 · Other+5 morePEACEJAM FOUNDATION: $68,000 · Civil RightsPEACEJAM FOUNDATIONSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $20,750 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVER…REALNESS PROJECT: $17,250 · Crime & LegalREALNESS PROJE…THE AFYA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesTHE AFYA FOU…NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $13,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORS LI…THE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK INC: $1,250 · Human ServicesDANCE TO BE FREE: $9,000 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureKATONAH MUSEUM OF ART: $5,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureCHEF ANN FOUNDATION: $11,000 · EducationCOLUMBUS COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGN: $8,250 · EducationYIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC: $7,000 · ReligionGROWING HOME INC: $2,500 · Religion
Other$106,500Civil Rights$68,000Crime & Legal$38,000Human Services$32,250Arts & Culture$22,000Education$19,250Religion$9,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEACEJAM FOUNDATION: $68,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetST CATHERINE'S CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $58,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $20,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AFYA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $18,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetREALNESS PROJECT: $17,250 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetNEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHEF ANN FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDANCE TO BE FREE: $9,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetCOLUMBUS COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGN: $8,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $7,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKATONAH MUSEUM OF ART: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRETURN TO FREEDOM INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGROWING HOME INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNPR FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKinosaito Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEACEJAM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST CATHERINE'S CENTER FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AFYA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds REALNESS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORS LINK CORP ↗
  • Who funds CHEF ANN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DANCE TO BE FREE ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds KATONAH MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds RETURN TO FREEDOM INC ↗
  • Who funds GROWING HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDIATORS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NPR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Kinosaito Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Denver FoundationCO12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Network for Good · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ira & Marylou Alpert Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ira & Marylou Alpert Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ira & Marylou Alpert Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ira & Marylou Alpert Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ira & Marylou Alpert’s filings →

    More from the funding graph