Skip to content
Iowa Coalition Against Domestic Violence at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Iowa Coalition Against Domestic Violence

To engage all people in a movement to change the social and political systems that perpetuate violence against women.

$214k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$184kHealth$42kCrime & Legal$17k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $61,950, the rows itemized in this filing. The $213,941 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $151,991 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $48k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$842k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NISSA AFRICAN FAMILY SERVICES$28,150
LUNA$20,000
FAMILY CRISIS CENTERS OF NORTHWEST IOWA$7,437
DVIP & RVAP$6,363
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $163k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CRISIS INTERVENTION AND ADVOCACY CENTER: $13k → 5%FAMILY CRISIS CENTERS OF NW IOWA: $12k → 8%WAYPOINT SERVICES: $24k → 9%LUNA: $20k → 10%CRISIS INTERVENTION AND ADVOCACY CENTER: $12k → 5%FAMILY CRISIS CENTERS OF NW IOWA: $9k → 8%WAYPOINT SERVICES: $18k → 9%FAMILY CRISIS CENTERS OF NORTHWEST IOWA: $7k → 8%WAYPOINT SERVICES: $17k → 9%WAYPOINT SERVICES: $13k → 9%WAYPOINT SERVICES: $11k → 9%WAYPOINT SERVICES: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$171k · 4 repeat orgs$134k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$171k
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+74%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    WAYPOINT SERVICES
    6× · 2019–2024 · $89k · revenue +77%
  • FC
    FAMILY CRISIS CENTERS INC
    3× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +58%
  • CI
    CRISIS INTERVENTION & ADVOCACY CENTER
    2× · 2017–2019 · $25k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • ZI
    ZION INTEGRATED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $18k · revenue +147%
  • CA
    CENTERS AGAINST ABUSE & SEXUAL ASSA
    one grant, 2017 · $17k · revenue +12%
  • AS
    AREA SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $14k · revenue +74%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Crisis Intervention Services Inc

Provide support, resources, and hope for a better future to persons affected by domestic abuse, sexual assault and other crisis.

Human Services
2
Crisis Center of the Plains

To reduce the effects of family violence and sexual assault and to assist victims of these crimes through programs of support, education and advocacy.

Human Services
3
Domestic Abuse Intervention Services Inc

Our mission is to empower those affected by domestic violence and advocate for social change through support, education, and outreach.

Human Services
4
Niad Center for Human Development Inc

The mission of crisis intervention service (cis) is to provide persons affected by domestic violence, sexual assault and homicide with professional, confidential, 24-hour services including safety and support and to prevent violence in our…

—
5
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
6
Iris Family Support Center Inc

Iris family support center, formerly known as scan, protects children, prepares parents, strengthens families and educates our community to stop child abuse and neglect.

Human Services
7
Lake County Crisis Center

A safe place is the leading advocate for eliminating domestic violence & human trafficking in northern illinois.

—
8
Codac Health Recovery & Wellness

Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.

—
9
Capital Area Family Violence Intervention Center Inc

To end domestic violence in the capital area through serving victims of domestic violence, educating the public about domestic violence, and working to eliminate economic, social and cultural conditions and attitudes that contribute to…

Human Services
10
Clackamas Women's Services

Breaking the isolation of domestic and sexual violence.

Human Services
11
Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County

The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.

Health
12
Ywca of Fort Dodge Ia

We are a state licensed substance abuse facility which functions to provide a clinically managed residence treatment center for women and women with children.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nisaa African Family Services; the most unlike its peers is Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WAYPOINT SERVICES: $89,425 · Human ServicesWAYPOINT SERVICESFAMILY CRISIS CENTERS INC: $28,102 · Human ServicesFAMILY CRISIS CENTERS INCCRISIS INTERVENTION & ADVOCACY CENTER: $25,273 · Human ServicesCRISIS INTERVENTION & ADVOCACY CENTERLATINAS UNIDAS POR UN NUEVO AMANECER: $20,000 · Human ServicesLATINAS UNIDAS POR UN NUEVO AMANECERCOMMUNITY OPPORTUNITIES INC: $11,346 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY OPPORTUNITIES INCFAMILY RESOURCES INC: $28,242 · OtherFAMILY RESOURCES INCCENTERS AGAINST ABUSE & SEXUAL ASSA: $17,126 · OtherCENTERS AGAINST ABUSE …CATHOLIC COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL CONCERN INC CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $9,000 · OtherCATHOLIC COUNCIL FOR S…DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROGRAM: $6,363 · OtherDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTE…ZION INTEGRATED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES: $18,228 · HealthZION INTEGRATED…AREA SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL INC: $13,962 · HealthAREA SUBSTANCE …JACKSON RECOVERY CENTERS INC: $9,630 · HealthJACKSON RECOVER…NISAA AFRICAN FAMILY SERVICES: $28,150 · Arts & CultureNISAA AFRI…
Human Services$174,146Other$60,731Health$41,820Arts & Culture$28,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWAYPOINT SERVICES: $89,425 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCES INC: $28,242 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNISAA AFRICAN FAMILY SERVICES: $28,150 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetFAMILY CRISIS CENTERS INC: $28,102 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCRISIS INTERVENTION & ADVOCACY CENTER: $25,273 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLATINAS UNIDAS POR UN NUEVO AMANECER: $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetZION INTEGRATED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES: $18,228 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCENTERS AGAINST ABUSE & SEXUAL ASSA: $17,126 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAREA SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL INC: $13,962 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY OPPORTUNITIES INC: $11,346 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJACKSON RECOVERY CENTERS INC: $9,630 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL CONCERN INC CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $9,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROGRAM: $6,363 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Iowa Coalition Agains…Community Fdn of Grea…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Iowa Coalition Against Sexual AssaultIA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Iowa Coalition Against Sexual Assault · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Iowa Coalition Against Domestic Violence funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Iowa Coalition Against Domestic Violence. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Iowa Coalition Against Domestic Violence?

    Find your warmest path to Iowa Coalition Against Domestic Violence through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Iowa Coalition Against Domestic Violence’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home