Skip to content

· Public charity

Investor Protection Trust

INVESTOR PROTECTION TRUST is a nonprofit organization devoted to investor education.

$5.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
37
Grants FY2024still arriving
33
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$6.0MPublic Benefit$2.0MEducation$2.0MHuman Services$1.1MCrime & Legal$675kMembership Benefit$569kArts & Culture$457kScience & Tech$224kOther$0
02FY2024 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $547k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+2 grants · $3.5M
$46,550
Median grant
33
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOC (NASAA)$2,000,000
NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOC (NASAA)$1,502,953
MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE SECURITIES DIVISION$223,931
PENNSYLVANIA SECURITIES DEPT$180,393
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF STATE$91,050
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES$78,485
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE$76,250
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE SECURITIES BUREAU$69,775
NEW HAMPSHIRE BUREAU OF SECURITIES REGULATION$68,475
ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION$67,775
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON$65,125
UTAH DIVISION OF SECURITIES$60,475
WYOMING SECTY OF STATE SECURITIES DIVISION$60,445
VIRGINIA SECURITIES$53,275
INDIANA SECURITIES DEPARTMENT$51,655
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NETWORTH TELEVISION PRODUCTION INC: $25k → 8%NETWORK TELEVISION PRODUCTIONS: $25k → 8%NETWORTH TELEVISION PRODUCTION INC: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10.0M · 42 repeat orgs$3.1M to everyone else

42 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
35

Total granted

$10.0M
$2.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+13%

Still filing today

24%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $669k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementSocial ScienceYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2019–2024 · $3.5M · revenue +168%
  • NC
    NEBRASKA COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION
    2× · 2020–2022 · $106k · revenue +32% · 33% of their budget
  • NT
    NETWORTH TELEVISION PRODUCTIONS INC
    3× · 2019–2024 · $60k · revenue ×29 · 72% of their budget

Funded once

  • TU
    Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education
    one grant, 2022 · $997k · revenue +13%
  • FA
    FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $350k · revenue +142%
  • MD
    MICHIGAN DEP OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
    one grant, 2023 · $159k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Association of College and University Business Officers

The usual public activitites of the national association of college and univsersity business officers (nacubo) are to develop, promote, and improve business and financial principles and practices in the administration of institutions of…

—
2
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
3
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
4
National Bureau of Economic Research Inc

The nber conducts unbiased, non-partisan economic research and communicates the findings of that research to academic researchers, policy-makers, and business professionals. (continued on schedule o)

Social Science
5
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners

Founded in 1889, the national association of regulatory utility commisioners (naruc) is a non-profit organization dedicated to representing the state public service commisions who regulate the utilities that provide essential services such…

—
6
Academy of International Business

We create, nurture, and empower a global community of scholars focused on creating, advancing, and disseminating knowledge in international business research, education, policy, and practice.

Education
7
American Bankers Association

See schedule othe aba's mission is to be a member-focused organization that provides advocacy, education, business solutions, and forums for an exchange of views and information that assists our members in providing financial services to…

—
8
National Education Association of the United States

Our mission is to advocate for education professionals and to unite our members and the nation to fulfill the promise of public education to prepare every student to succeed in a diverse and interdependent world.

—
9
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
10
American Association of State Colleges and Universities

Aascu is a washington, d.c. based higher education association that represents the sector of over 500 regional public colleges, universities, and systems whose members share a learning and teaching centered culture, a commitment to…

Education
11
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
12
National Association of Broadcasters

National association of broadcasters (nab) advances the interest of radio and television broadcasters in federal government, industry and public affairs; improves the quality of broadcasting, and encourages technological innovation and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mississippi Council On Economic Education; the most unlike its peers is Short the Squirrel Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
15/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,532,228 · OtherNORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION INCIOWA INSURANCE DIVISION SECURITIES AND REGULATED INDUSTRIES: $620,509 · OtherIOWA INSURANCE DIVISION SECURITIES AND REGULATED INDUSTRIESCAL POLY HUMBOLDT: $510,343 · OtherSTATE OF INDIANA: $449,583 · Other+68 more: $5,905,608 · Other+68 moreTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $997,142 · EducationTemple Univ…University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc: $124,453 · EducationUniversity …SOCIETY FOR FINANCIAL EDUCATION & PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: $57,275 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $51,200 · Education+4 more: $110,505 · Education+4 moreASSOCIATION FOR FINANCIAL COUNSELING AND PLANNING EDUCATION: $268,310 · Community ImprovementCAPITAL INNOVATION LAB INC: $54,300 · Community ImprovementAARP FOUNDATION: $158,607 · Human ServicesNETWORTH TELEVISION PRODUCTIONS INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesNEBRASKA COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $106,250 · Social ScienceALABAMA COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $8,400 · Social ScienceTHE PIABA FOUNDATION INC: $59,000 · Public BenefitARKANSAS COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $53,920 · Youth Development
Other$11,018,271Education$1,340,575Community Improvement$322,610Human Services$218,607Social Science$114,650Public Benefit$59,000Youth Development$53,920

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,532,228 over 2y, 15% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $997,142 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS INC: $350,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR FINANCIAL COUNSELING AND PLANNING EDUCATION: $268,310 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetINVESTOR PROTECTION TRUST: $159,864 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $158,607 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation Inc: $124,453 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEBRASKA COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $106,250 over 2y, 33% of budgetINVESTOR PROTECTION INSTITUTE: $102,287 over 2y, 80% of budgetNETWORTH TELEVISION PRODUCTIONS INC: $60,000 over 3y, 72% of budgetTHE PIABA FOUNDATION INC: $59,000 over 3y, 33% of budgetSOCIETY FOR FINANCIAL EDUCATION & PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: $57,275 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetARKANSAS COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $53,920 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $51,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSISSIPPI COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $36,055 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHE ALABAMA FBLAPBL FOUNDATION: $33,200 over 3y, 13% of budgetAmerican Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education: $33,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION IN MARYLAND INC: $31,500 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHORT THE SQUIRREL INC: $30,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetALABAMA BROADCASTERS ASSOCIATION: $28,295 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetBetter Business Bureau of North Alabama: $13,657 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBRIDGE BUILDERS FOUNDATION INC: $11,250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetALABAMA COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $8,400 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALABAMA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR FINANCIAL COUNSELING AND PLANNING EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds INVESTOR PROTECTION TRUST ↗
  • Who funds AARP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds INVESTOR PROTECTION INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds NETWORTH TELEVISION PRODUCTIONS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists IncGA40.7× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Inc · Association of State and Territorial Health Officials · American Bar Association · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · National Council for State Authorization Reciprocity Agreements · National Assembly of State Arts Agencies Inc · Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation · Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc · Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation Inc · The Pew Charitable Trusts · North American Association of Central Cancer Registries · National Association of State Procurement Officals Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Investor Protection Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Investor Protection Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Investor Protection Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Investor Protection Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Investor Protection’s filings →

    More from the funding graph