Skip to content
Intrust Bank Charitable Tr at a glance

· Private foundation

Intrust Bank Charitable Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$253k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$3.2MEducation$1.3MHealth$939kHuman Services$910kArts & Culture$482kAnimals$220kRecreation & Sports$130kFood & Nutrition$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $444k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $330k
  • $250k+1 grant · $253k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS$252,972
EMPOWER EVERGREEN INC$100,000
KANSAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER$100,000
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY$80,000
EXPLORATION PLACE$50,000
WSU Foundation & Alumni Engagement$40,000
HUNTER HEALTH CLINIC$33,333
SEDGWICK COUNTY ZOO$30,000
YMCA OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY$30,000
NEWTON PUBLIC LIBRARY$30,000
ORPHEUM PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$30,000
DCCCA$25,000
Goodwill Industries of Kansas$25,000
FRIENDS UNIVERSITY$25,000
Newton Medical Center$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YMCA OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $30k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $30k → 16%ENVISION: $30k → 16%ENVISION: $30k → 16%ENVISION: $30k → 16%ENVISION: $30k → 16%ENVISION: $30k → 16%ENVISION: $10k → 16%ENVISION: $10k → 16%EMPOWER EVERGREEN INC: $100k → 16%EMPOWER EVERGREEN INC: $100k → 16%EMPOWER EVERGREEN INC: $100k → 16%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $20k → 16%WICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $200k → 16%GREATER WICHITA YMCA: $30k → 16%GREATER WICHITA YMCA: $30k → 16%GREATER WICHITA YMCA: $30k → 16%GREATER WICHITA YMCA: $30k → 16%GREATER WICHITA YMCA: $30k → 16%STARKEY INC: $30k → 16%STARKEY INC: $30k → 16%STARKEY INC: $30k → 16%STARKEY INC: $30k → 16%STARKEY INC: $30k → 16%STARKEY INC: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.2M · 50 repeat orgs$596k to everyone else

50 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
7

Total granted

$7.2M
$471k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+99%

Still filing today

62%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +13%
  • KH
    Kansas Health Science University Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $400k · revenue ×41
  • FU
    Friends University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $268k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • WF
    WICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue -16%
  • TK
    THE KANSAS AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +23%
  • WH
    WICHITA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +146%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of the Midlands

United way connects people and resources to improve the quality of life in the midlands. united way invests in a broad range of community programs that increase access to health care, improve student success, assist people in crisis to…

Philanthropy
2
Healthcore Clinic Inc

The mission of healthcore clinic, inc is to provide quality family healthcare through improved access and a heightened and unrelenting focus on education and prevention.

Health
3
The United Way of El Dorado Kansas Inc

United way of el dorado works to advance the common good by creating opportunities for a better life for all by improving the aspects of health, education and income stability. a strong community is built by addressing health, education…

—
4
Kansas Wesleyan University

Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.

Education
5
Wichita Regional Chamber of Commerce Inc

To drive economic growth and community advancement in the wichita region.

—
6
United Way of Central Kansas Inc

United way improves lives by mobilizing the caring power of communities around the world to advance the common good.

Philanthropy
7
Kansas Cooperative Council

The kansas cooperative council exists to promote, support and advance the interests, business success, and understanding of agricultural, utility, credit and consumer cooperatives and their members through legislation and regulatory…

—
8
United Way of Mcpherson County Inc

United way of mcpherson county is dedicated to building a stronger community by addressing issues related to education, health, and income.

Philanthropy
9
Chamber of Commerce of Greater Kansas City

Leading the way to the best kc region by convening innovative leaders, collaborating with like-minded organizations, advocating for positive change, and helping small businesses grow.

—
10
Wichita Center for Graduate Medical Education Inc

On behalf of the university of kansas school of medicine-wichita, wcgme administers the graduate medical education program for resident physicians in the city of wichita, kansas. wcgme's involvement in graduate medical education in wichita…

Education
11
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
12
Wichita Downtown Development Corporation

The mission of Downtown Wichita is to cultivate opportunities that revitalize and enhance Wichita's urban core.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dccca Inc; the most unlike its peers is Newman University Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
29/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC: $2,774,931 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC+8 more: $184,394 · Philanthropy+8 moreSEDGWICK COUNTY ZOO: $220,000 · OtherSEDGWICK COUNTY ZOOIndividual grant recipient: $160,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $160,000 · OtherKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITYWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY: $150,000 · OtherWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITYNEWTON PUBLIC LIBRARY: $120,000 · OtherNEWTON PUBLIC LIBRARYTOP LEARNING CENTER: $120,000 · OtherTOP LEARNING CENTERHUNTER HEALTH CLINIC: $99,999 · OtherHUNTER HEALTH CLINICUNITED WAY OF EL DORADO: $98,256 · OtherUNITED WAY OF GREATER KS CITY: $79,362 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $75,000 · OtherKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC: $100,000 · OtherKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE …+22 more: $465,715 · Other+22 moreKansas Health Science University Inc: $400,000 · EducationKansas Health S…Friends University: $267,999 · EducationFriends Univers…PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $250,000 · EducationPHILLIPS FUNDAM…THE WICHITA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationTHE WICHITA EDU…NEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC: $50,000 · EducationEMPOWER EVERGREEN INC: $300,000 · Human ServicesEMPOWER EVERGRE…WICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $200,000 · Human ServicesWICHITA FAMILY …ENVISION INC: $170,000 · Human ServicesENVISION INCSTARKEY INC: $165,000 · Human ServicesSTARKEY INCTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WICHITA KANSAS (2311): $150,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $60,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHR…+1 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesMARK ARTS INC: $220,000 · Arts & CultureTHE KANSAS AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM INC: $200,000 · Arts & CultureEXPLORATION PLACE INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureORPHEUM PERFORMING ARTS CENTRE LTD: $50,000 · Arts & CultureGRACEMED HEALTH CLINIC INC: $50,000 · HealthKVC HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $40,000 · HealthHEARTSPRING INC: $25,000 · HealthDCCCA INC: $25,000 · HealthSUSAN B ALLEN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $20,000 · HealthKVC HOSPITALS INC: $10,000 · HealthLEAGUE 42 FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$2,959,325Other$1,848,332Education$1,067,999Human Services$1,065,000Arts & Culture$570,000Health$170,000Recreation & Sports$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC: $2,774,931 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetKansas Health Science University Inc: $400,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetEMPOWER EVERGREEN INC: $300,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetFriends University: $267,999 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $250,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetMARK ARTS INC: $220,000 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetWICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $200,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetTHE KANSAS AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM INC: $200,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetENVISION INC: $170,000 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetSTARKEY INC: $165,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WICHITA KANSAS (2311): $150,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WICHITA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 47% of budgetLEAGUE 42 FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC: $100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEXPLORATION PLACE INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHUNTER HEALTH CLINIC: $99,999 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $77,423 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetORPHEUM PERFORMING ARTS CENTRE LTD: $50,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetGRACEMED HEALTH CLINIC INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKVC HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKONZA UNITED WAY INC: $30,760 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetWICHITA PARKS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetGEARY COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF HARVEY AND MARION COUNTIES INC: $29,176 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KAW VALLEY INC: $25,281 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHEARTSPRING INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF KANSAS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDCCCA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUSAN B ALLEN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST ARKANSAS INC: $19,050 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF KANSAS HEARTLAND INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED METHODIST OPEN DOOR: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKVC HOSPITALS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of Norman Inc: $7,191 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTULSA AREA UNITED WAY: $1,714 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF RENO COUNTY: $1,464 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Kansas Community Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC ↗
  • Who funds Kansas Health Science University Inc ↗
  • Who funds EMPOWER EVERGREEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends University ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MARK ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE KANSAS AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVISION INC ↗
  • Who funds STARKEY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WICHITA KANSAS (2311) ↗
  • Who funds THE WICHITA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE 42 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds EXPLORATION PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNTER HEALTH CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY ↗
  • Who funds NEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ORPHEUM PERFORMING ARTS CENTRE LTD ↗
  • Who funds GRACEMED HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds KVC HEALTH SYSTEMS INC ↗
  • Who funds KONZA UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GEARY COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF HARVEY AND MARION COUNTIES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF KAW VALLEY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kansas Health Foundat…Dwane L and Velma Lun…Berry Foundation IncTextron Charitable Tr…Ima FoundationThe Fidelity Bank Fou…Wichita FoundationCommerce Bancshares F…Belin FoundationLattner Family Founda…United Way of the Pla…Je and le Mabee Found…
Kansas Health FoundationKS46× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kansas Health Foundation · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Berry Foundation Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Ima Foundation · The Fidelity Bank Foundation · Wichita Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Belin Foundation · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · United Way of the Plains Inc · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Intrust Bank Charitable Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Intrust Bank Charitable Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Intrust Bank Charitable Tr?

Find your warmest path to Intrust Bank Charitable Tr through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Intrust Bank Charitable Tr’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home