Skip to content
Interventional Cardiology Research Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Interventional Cardiology Research Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$103k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$97kEducation$87kArts & Culture$78kRecreation & Sports$64kHealth$53kPublic Safety & Disaster$48kCrime & Legal$40kAnimals$37kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $73k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KWANDWE RHINO CONSERVATION TRUST CO DINO AND TRICHE CHOUEST$20,000
NOTRE DAME SEMINARY$20,000
JOHN CURTIS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$13,000
SPIRIT OF CHARITY FOUNDATION$10,000
GREAT HEARTS HARVEST SCHOOL$10,000
FRIENDS HELPING KIDS INC$7,500
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS$5,000
SAVANNAH SCIENCE MUSEUM$5,000
TROOP C GRANT A WISH$5,000
TERREBONNE CHURCHES UNITED FOODBANK INC$5,000
TRIUMPH OVER KID CANCER FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%THE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 17%KINGSLEY HOUSE INC: $10k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$441k · 19 repeat orgs$175k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
15

Total granted

$441k
$155k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+20%

Still filing today

42%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCrime & LegalInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    FRIENDS HELPING KIDS INC
    4× · 2019–2024 · $36k · revenue +0% · 38% of their budget
  • LT
    Louisiana Trooper Foundation Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $20k · revenue +423% · 54% of their budget
  • TO
    TRIUMPH OVER KID CANCER FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $18k · revenue +226%

Funded once

  • AO
    ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • TA
    TIGER ATHLETIC FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +90%
  • TJ
    THE JACOBS INSTITUTE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lsu Research Foundation
Community Improvement
2
Louisiana Troopers Charities Inc

To assist in educational and community oriented programs that promote or improve the standing of the louisiana state police in the communities of louisiana. the organization also provides charitable relief assistance during times of crisis…

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Orleans Sheriff's Office Foundation
Crime & Legal
4
Lsu Alumni Association

The mission is to protect, promote, and foster the welfare of louisiana state university and to create and nurture mutually beneficial relationships between the university and its alumni and friends. the association, using the talents and…

—
5
Lsu Health Sciences Foundation in Shreveport

The sole mission of the foundation is to support, enhance and assist the lsu health sciences center at shreveport in its many endeavors.

Philanthropy
6
Louisiana Fraternal Order of Police Foundation

To advance the safety, security, and well-being of louisiana's law enforcement officers and their families by making available appropriate safety devices and/or training for law enforcement personnel, to the extent that local government is…

Crime & Legal
7
Louisiana State Medical Society

The society's exempt purpose is to extend medical knowledge, advance medical science, elevate the standards of medical education and training, enforce just medical laws and regulations, promote dialogue and cooperation among physicians and…

—
8
Lsu Health Sciences Center - Shreveport Faculty Group Practice

No board approved mission statement

Health
9
Lsu Foundation

The lsu foundation cultivates and invests in philanthropic partnerships to support and advance lsu's academic priorities.

Education
10
Louisiana Alliance for Nonprofits

To strengthen, promote, and build the capacity of louisiana's nonprofit sector through education, advocacy, and member services.

Philanthropy
11
Louisiana Cancer Foundation for Research and Education Inc

To improve opportunities for cancer research in Louisiana and enhance educational efforts regarding prevention and control over cancer.

Health
12
Louisiana State Bar Association

The mission of the louisiana state bar association is to assist its members in the practice of law, assure access to and aid in the administration of justice, assist the supreme court in the regulation of the practice of law, uphold the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Olympics Louisiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bastion Community of Resilience. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NOTRE DAME SEMINARY OF NEW ORLEANS: $75,000 · OtherNOTRE DAME SEMINARY OF NEW ORLEANSIndividual grant recipient: $42,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJOHN CURTIS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $39,385 · OtherJOHN CURTIS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLFRIENDS HELPING KIDS INC: $35,500 · OtherFRIENDS HELPING KIDS INCKWANDWE RHINO CONSERVATION TRUST CO DINO AND TRICHE CHOUEST: $35,000 · OtherKWANDWE RHINO CONSERVATION TRUST CO DINO AND TRICHE CHOUESTARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS: $20,000 · OtherTHEATRE BATON ROUGE: $20,000 · OtherST MICHAEL SPECIAL SCHOOL: $20,000 · OtherFIRST TO FIGHT FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherOWEN RAHM AND ELLIE RAHM: $20,000 · OtherGREAT HEARTS HARVEST SCHOOL: $15,000 · OtherBASTION COMMUNITY OF RESILIENCE: $15,550 · Other+12 more: $85,500 · Other+12 moreTHE JACOBS INSTITUTE INC: $20,000 · HealthTRIUMPH OVER KID CANCER FOUNDATION: $17,500 · HealthTroop C Grant A Wish: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $600 · HealthNEW ORLEANS POLICE AND JUSTICE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Crime & LegalLouisiana Trooper Foundation Inc: $20,000 · Crime & LegalSpirit of America Worldwide: $16,000 · InternationalHELIO FOUNDATION: $16,000 · InternationalTIGER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationCLOVER NOLA INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Human Services610 STOMPERS INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSAVANNAH SCIENCE MUSEUM INC: $8,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$442,935Health$43,100Crime & Legal$40,000International$32,000Education$20,000Human Services$20,000Arts & Culture$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS HELPING KIDS INC: $35,500 over 4y, 38% of budgetTIGER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JACOBS INSTITUTE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW ORLEANS POLICE AND JUSTICE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLouisiana Trooper Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 54% of budgetTRIUMPH OVER KID CANCER FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetSpirit of America Worldwide: $16,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHELIO FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBASTION COMMUNITY OF RESILIENCE: $15,550 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetSPIRIT OF CHARITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCLOVER NOLA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget610 STOMPERS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetSAVANNAH SCIENCE MUSEUM INC: $8,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS LOUISIANA INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLOUISIANA STATE TROOPERS ASSN: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTroop C Grant A Wish: $5,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetTerrebonne Churches United Foodbank Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLOUISIANA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS HELPING KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds TIGER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE JACOBS INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ORLEANS POLICE AND JUSTICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Louisiana Trooper Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRIUMPH OVER KID CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Spirit of America Worldwide ↗
  • Who funds HELIO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BASTION COMMUNITY OF RESILIENCE ↗
  • Who funds SPIRIT OF CHARITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CLOVER NOLA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds 610 STOMPERS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVANNAH SCIENCE MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS LOUISIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA STATE TROOPERS ASSN ↗
  • Who funds Troop C Grant A Wish ↗
  • Who funds Terrebonne Churches United Foodbank Inc ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gayle and Tom Benson …The Greater New Orlea…Shell USA Company Fou…Eugenie & Joseph Jone…Goldring Family Found…Community Foundation …The Vincent Saia Foun…Lauricella Land Compa…The Joe W and Dorothy…The Almar Foundationd…Baptist Community Min…United Way of Southea…
Gayle and Tom Benson Charitable FoundationLA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gayle and Tom Benson Charitable Foundation · The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Eugenie & Joseph Jones Family Foundation · Goldring Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Acadiana · The Vincent Saia Foundation · Lauricella Land Company Foundation · The Joe W and Dorothy D Brown Foundation · The Almar Foundationdba The Alden and Margaret Laborde Foundation · Baptist Community Ministries · United Way of Southeast Louisiana

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Interventional Cardiology Research Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Interventional Cardiology Research Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Interventional Cardiology Research Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Interventional Cardiology Research Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Interventional Cardiology Research’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home